Chat with this content: Summary, Analysis, News...
Share on Reddit
Telia Company: The Nordic Telecom Giant's 170-Year Journey
I. Introduction & Episode Roadmap
Picture the crisp winter air of Stockholm in 1853, where workers strung copper wires between wooden poles connecting Sweden's capital to the university town of Uppsala. That first electric telegraph line—a mere 72 kilometers of humming cable—represented more than technological progress. It marked the birth of what would become one of Europe's most consequential telecommunications stories, a saga spanning from Morse code to 5G, from state monopoly to billion-dollar corruption scandal, and from near-merger disaster to Nordic dominance.
Today, Telia Company was founded in 1853 and is headquartered in Solna, Sweden. As of September 2025, Telia Company has a market cap of $15 billion with trailing 12-month revenue of $8.2 billion. The company serves as the telecommunications backbone for an entire region—a Swedish multinational telecommunications company and mobile network operator present in Sweden, Finland, Norway, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania.
The central question driving this deep dive is profound: How did a 19th-century Swedish telegraph monopoly navigate deregulation, survive one of the largest bribery scandals in corporate history, and emerge as the dominant Nordic telecom? Of the stock, 39.5% is owned by the Swedish government, creating a fascinating case study in the tensions between state ownership and modern corporate governance.
This is no ordinary corporate history. It encompasses the spectacular failure of a "merger of equals" with Norway's Telenor—destroyed by nationalist pride over headquarters location. It includes a successful union with Finland's Sonera, salvaged only by learning from past mistakes. And it features one of the most damaging corruption scandals in Swedish business history, involving bribes to the daughter of an Uzbek dictator, culminating in a $965 million global settlement.
The Telia story raises fundamental questions about what happens when national champions must compete in deregulated markets, when growth-hungry executives push into corrupt emerging markets, and when partial state ownership creates unique governance challenges. For investors, Telia represents both the promise and peril of European telecoms—stable cash flows and generous dividends, offset by regulatory complexity and limited growth potential.
II. Origins: From Telegraph to Telephone Monopoly (1853–1980)
The Swedish Kungl. Telegrafverket (literally: Royal Telegraph Agency) was founded in 1853, when the first electric telegraph line was established between Stockholm and Uppsala. This wasn't merely a technological achievement—it was the creation of strategic national infrastructure at a time when Sweden was rapidly industrializing and needed reliable long-distance communication for government and commerce.
The early Swedish telecommunications market featured a curious competitive dynamic that shaped the industry for generations. Allmänna Telefon found an equipment supplier in Lars Magnus Ericsson—yes, that Ericsson, the same company that today provides Telia with 5G network equipment. The relationship between Sweden's telecom operators and equipment makers stretches back over 150 years, creating a uniquely integrated Nordic telecommunications ecosystem.
The path to monopoly followed a pattern familiar across European telecoms. By securing exclusive control over long-distance telephone lines, the state-owned Telegrafverket gradually absorbed local networks operated by private companies. By approximately 1920, it had achieved de facto monopoly status across Sweden. This monopoly position would persist for decades, shaping the company's culture, operations, and relationship with government.
The Finnish parallel emerged from different historical circumstances. The history of Sonera dates back to 1917, when Suomen Lennätinlaitos (Finnish Telegraph Agency) was founded. In 1927, the telegraph agency was merged with the Finnish Post to form a new agency, Post and Telegraph Agency. Finland's path differed in one crucial respect that would later matter during the merger: Before privatisation, Telia was a state telephone monopoly. Sonera, on the other hand, had a monopoly only on trunk network calls, while most (c. 75%) of local telecommunication was provided by telephone cooperatives.
This distinction—Swedish total control versus Finnish cooperative tradition—reflected deeper cultural differences that would resurface throughout the companies' histories. The Swedish state viewed telecommunications as a natural monopoly requiring centralized control. Finland's more fragmented approach created a tradition of local autonomy that persists in how Telia operates its Finnish business today.
For investors, this historical monopoly heritage matters because it explains both Telia's enormous infrastructure advantages and its cultural challenges. Companies that spent a century as monopolies don't naturally develop the customer-focused agility of competitive enterprises. This legacy has shaped every transformation attempt since deregulation.
III. The Mobile Revolution & Privatization (1980s–2000)
The 1980s transformed telecommunications globally, and Sweden stood at the forefront. Private competition in analogue mobile phone systems had already broken the telephone monopoly, and the growing internet allowed more opportunities for competitors. Televerket wasn't just adapting to change—it was pioneering it. The Nordic countries developed the NMT (Nordic Mobile Telephone) system, one of the world's first automated cellular phone systems, followed in the 1990s by GSM, which became the global standard.
The organizational evolution from government agency to commercial enterprise happened in stages. In 1984, Televerket separated from the Swedish government to become a for-profit state-owned enterprise. In 1990, it formed the Unisource partnership with KPN of the Netherlands, an early attempt at cross-border scale. In 1993, the company adopted the Telia name, signaling its commercial ambitions.
The most important of Telia's Swedish competitors in these areas has been Tele2, founded by Jan Stenbeck, one of Sweden's most colorful entrepreneurs. The rivalry between incumbent Telia and challenger Tele2 would define Swedish telecommunications for decades, with Tele2 consistently pushing for deregulation and aggressive pricing while Telia leveraged its infrastructure advantages.
The Finnish evolution paralleled Sweden's path. In the same year, the Post and Telegraph Agency was divided to form two companies, Suomen Posti Oy (Finnish Post), and Telecom Finland Oy. Telecom Finland changed its name to Sonera in 1998, and went public on both the Helsinki and NASDAQ stock exchanges.
The dot-com IPO of Telia on June 13, 2000, occurred at the height of market euphoria. Close to one-third of Telia's shares were introduced on the Stockholm Stock Exchange, generating enormous retail investor interest. But the timing proved unfortunate—the telecommunications bubble was already deflating, leaving early investors underwater for years.
When PTS awarded four licenses for the 3rd generation mobile networks in December 2000, Telia was not among the winners, but later established an agreement to build a 3G network jointly with Tele2 using Tele2's licence. SUNAB was founded as the jointly owned company that would in turn build, own and operate the joint 3G network.
The 3G license drama illustrated both Telia's incumbent challenges and pragmatic adaptability. Losing the license auction was humiliating for the former monopolist. But rather than remain locked out of next-generation networks, Telia partnered with its primary rival—a move that demonstrated the kind of strategic flexibility that would prove essential in later challenges.
IV. The Failed Telenor Merger & Path to Sonera (1999–2002)
After leaving Unisource in 1998, Telia began looking about for a new international partner. In 1999, the company announced that it had agreed to a merger with Telenor, of Norway. The "merger of equals" soon collapsed, however, notably because of disagreements about where to locate the new group's headquarters.
The Telia-Telenor merger represents one of the most spectacular failures in Nordic business history—and a cautionary tale about what happens when national pride overwhelms commercial logic.
On 20 January 1999, the Swedish and Norwegian governments announced an intended merger between their respective state-owned telecommunications firms, Telia and Telenor. After nine months of lively discussions between the parties, and following confirmation by the European Commission, the merger agreement was concluded on 19 October 1999. However, on 16 December, after less than two months of operation, it was announced that the merger had ended.
What went wrong? Telia and Telenor were the largest telecom operators in Sweden and Norway, respectively. Both were government-owned with a strong monopoly over their respective national markets for a long time. Despite perceived similarities between the negotiating parties in national culture, corporate practice, and language, the negotiation eventually went askew and the ongoing merger ended in December 1999 after only two months in existence.
There had been many smaller disputes and controversial interventions from both sides in the merger process, with many, though perhaps not all, of the disputes being made public. The disputes continued after the merger, with the final straw coming when the chair of the Telenor/Telia board, the Swede Jan-Ă…ke Kark, used his casting vote to push through a decision that the headquarters for the mobile telephones business should be situated in Stockholm, and not in Oslo as the Norwegians wished.
Possibly for the first time in the rather turbulent merger, the Norwegians and the Swedes were united in their opinion about the termination of the arrangement. The Norwegian Prime Minister Kjell-Magne Bondevik and the Swedish Prime Minister Göran Persson issued a joint statement announcing the breakdown, which had been decided by both governments in consultation with each other. The two Prime Ministers stated that even if the merger had been the right move from industrial and economic policy perspectives, developments during recent months has sadly shown that there were difficulties in carrying out the merger in the way it had been intended.
The failure of the merger had cost Telia SEK 200–250 million alone. But the real cost was opportunity. Telia Company in its current form was first established as TeliaSonera, as the result of a 2002 merger between the Swedish and Finnish telecommunications companies, Telia and Sonera. This merger followed three years after Telia's failed merger attempt with Norwegian telecommunications company Telenor, now its chief competitor in the Nordic countries.
The failure also revealed the unique challenges of mergers involving state-owned enterprises. A merger between incumbents meant strong government intervention, and the deal became politically infected. Finally, the whole affair turned into a very public fiasco that embarrassed both governments and companies.
V. TeliaSonera: Building a Nordic-Baltic Champion (2003–2010)
If the Telenor disaster represented everything that could go wrong in a telecom merger, the Sonera combination showed how learning from failure could lead to success.
Sonera brought both attractive assets and serious challenges. Sonera was in financial difficulties after several expensive purchases of European 3G licences, which would also have required massive additional investments to exploit them. Telia had been more cautious and had the financial muscle to acquire Sonera.
The merger will involve a share exchange, with the current Telia shareholders owning 64% of the new company and current Sonera shareholders 36%. Both companies are mainly state owned - the Swedish state owns 70% of Telia, and the Finnish state 53% of Sonera. The Swedish state would own 45% of the new merged company, and the Finnish state 19%.
To avoid the mistakes of the Telenor merger attempt, the two sides agreed to maintain their existing Finnish and Swedish operations more or less intact, creating a corporate headquarters in Stockholm only for companywide decisions. Telia and Sonera also agreed to bring in a "neutral" CEO with no connection to either firm, choosing Anders Igel, former head of stationery company Esselte, for the role.
This was crucial—learning from the headquarters disaster that killed the Telenor deal. Rather than forcing a winner-take-all decision on sensitive cultural issues, leadership preserved national identities while building group-level coordination.
Pro forma results also exclude the results from our Swedish cable TV operations and Telia Mobile Finland, which we divested in June 2003 due to a requirement by the EU Commission to obtain clearance for the merger. EU regulatory requirements shaped the deal structure from the start, forcing divestitures that would eliminate competitive overlaps.
The combined company claimed 8.6 million fixed line subscribers and nearly ten million mobile telephone subscribers, and pro forma revenues of EUR 8.8 billion for 2002. Fixed telephony accounted for a little more than 40 percent of the group's sales; mobile telephony, at nearly 30 percent, was the company's fastest growing business.
Although Sweden and Finland remain the company's largest revenue markets, the company has extensive holdings throughout the Scandinavian and Baltic regions, as well as a strong share in Turkey, through its holding in that country's Turkcell mobile phone operator, and in such former Soviet Union states as Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Kazakhstan.
The state divestiture question continued throughout this period. During the run-up to the 2006 general election the Swedish liberal-conservative Alliance stated as one of its policy aims to reduce government ownership in commercial entities, and specifically to sell its stake in TeliaSonera. The Alliance went on to win the election and formed a coalition government. After the merger with Sonera, the Swedish State held 46% of the shares and with parliamentary approval the government sold down to 37.3%.
But further privatization proved elusive. On 16 March 2011, the Alliance administration lost a parliamentary vote on sale of publicly owned commercial entities, including TeliaSonera, when a coalition of all opposition parties — the Left Party, Social Democratic Party, Green Party and Sweden Democrats — united against the Alliance. The Swedish state remains Telia's largest shareholder today, with approximately 39.5% of shares.
VI. The Eurasia Expansion & Corruption Scandal (2007–2017)
This is the darkest chapter in Telia's history, and arguably one of the largest corporate corruption scandals in Swedish history. It would cost the company nearly a billion dollars, force the resignation of its CEO, and fundamentally reshape its geographic strategy.
The company has been linked to corruption scandals in its dealings with the regimes in Uzbekistan and Azerbaijan. Telia's bribery scandal in relation to the Ilham Aliyev regime in Azerbaijan has been described as "possibly the largest bribery in Swedish history."
The Uzbekistan scandal revealed the dangers of emerging market expansion at any cost. In Uzbekistan, the company's subsidiary Ucell grew rapidly, increasing subscribers from 400,000 to 9 million by 2012. But this growth came at an extraordinary price.
Sweden-based telecommunications provider Telia Company AB has agreed to pay $965 million in a global settlement with the Securities and Exchange Commission, U.S. Department of Justice, and Dutch and Swedish law enforcement to resolve charges related to violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) to win business in Uzbekistan. According to the SEC's order, Telia entered the Uzbek telecommunications market by offering and paying at least $330 million in bribes to a shell company under the guise of payments for lobbying and consulting services that never actually occurred. The shell company was controlled by an Uzbek government official who was a family member of the President of Uzbekistan and in a position to exert significant influence over other Uzbek officials, causing them to take official actions to benefit Telia's business in Uzbekistan.
The unnamed "government official" was Gulnara Karimova, eldest daughter of Uzbekistan's President Islam Karimov. Through separate agreements with the Department of Justice, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Public Prosecution Service of the Netherlands (Openbaar Ministerie or "OM"), Telia resolved allegations that it paid more than $331 million in bribes to Gulnara Karimova, the daughter of the late Uzbek President Islam Karimov, in order to expand into the Uzbek telecommunications market.
According to court documents, in 2007, Telia acquired Uzbek telecommunications operator Coscom LLC in an attempt to enter the telecommunications market in Uzbekistan. Through a series of complicated transactions effectuated via a shell company, Telia and Coscom paid $331 million in bribes between 2007 and 2010 to Gulnara Karimova, the daughter of the late Uzbek president. Karimova had substantial control over Uzbek telecommunications projects. The bribes resulted in $457 million in profits for Telia.
On September 21, 2017, U.S. authorities announced the first major Foreign Corrupt Practices Act settlement under the Trump administration—a $965 million global resolution with a Sweden-based international telecommunications company, Telia Company AB, and its indirectly owned subsidiary in Uzbekistan, Coscom LLC. Despite the magnitude of the Telia settlement, which is the third-largest global resolution of charges to date under the FCPA.
The leadership consequences were severe. In February 2014, the chief executive of TeliaSonera was forced to resign after serious failures of due diligence were uncovered. Swedish prosecutors filed charges against three former Telia executives: Lars Nyberg, Tero Kivisaari, and Olli Tuohimaa. Nyberg served as TeliaSonera's CEO from 2007 to 2013.
In its DPA with Telia, the DOJ applauded Telia's "extensive remedial measures," which included: "terminating all individuals who had a supervisory role over those engaged in the misconduct, including every member of the Company's board who took part in the decision to enter Uzbekistan, or failed to detect the corrupt conduct described".
The rebranding was part of the recovery. The company was formerly known as TeliaSonera AB (publ) and changed its name to Telia Company in April 2016. Dropping the "Sonera" suffix signaled a break from the past, though the timing—coming amid the corruption investigations—made the rebranding as much about damage control as brand strategy.
The strategic pivot away from Eurasia began in 2015. In December 2015, TeliaSonera announced its exit from Nepal, selling its 60.4 percent stake in Ncell to Malaysian telecommunications group Axiata. Similar exits followed from Georgia, Kazakhstan, Moldova, and eventually Uzbekistan itself—though extracting value from these assets proved challenging amid the corruption investigations.
VII. Strategic Reset: Focusing on Nordic-Baltic Core (2015–2020)
The corruption scandal forced a fundamental reassessment of Telia's geographic strategy. The emerging market expansion that had seemed like a path to growth had instead destroyed value, reputation, and executive careers.
The new strategy was clear: focus on markets where Telia had genuine competitive advantages and could operate without the governance risks that plagued Eurasian operations.
Telia Company has acquired Get and TDC Norway for a combined enterprise value of NOK21 billion (€2.2 billion) on a cash and debt free basis. The Danish operator TDC's Norwegian business encompasses GET, a leading provider of fixed and TV services, with a total of 518,000 households and businesses connected to its fiber-based network, and more than 1 million private and business customers who use the TV and broadband services on a daily basis.
This July 2018 acquisition transformed Telia's Norwegian position. Rather than exiting challenging markets, Telia was doubling down on Nordic core markets where it could build convergent offerings combining mobile, fixed, and TV services.
In December 2018, Telia in cooperation with Ericsson launched Sweden's first 5G network at KTH Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm. The 5G launch demonstrated continued technological leadership even as the company was extracting itself from scandal-plagued emerging markets.
The media strategy pivot represented another transformational bet. Telia Company announced the acquisition of Bonnier Broadcasting, including brands TV4 in Sweden, MTV in Finland and C More which is present in both markets, on July 20, 2018, from Bonnier AB for SEK 9.2 billion on a cash and debt free basis. The acquisition is expected to generate EBITDA synergies as per 2020 with a full run-rate of SEK 600 million in 2022. The synergies will be divided between three areas – enhancing our core business, more of C More and TV4 Play, and cost efficiencies.
The logic seemed compelling: combine Telia's leading mobile and fixed networks with one of the most successful commercial media houses in the Nordics. Other telecoms—AT&T with Time Warner, Comcast with NBCUniversal—were pursuing similar convergence strategies. Content could differentiate Telia's bundles and reduce churn.
The deal was completed on 2 December 2019, following an approval from the European Commission. The regulatory path required significant concessions, including commitments to provide Bonnier's channels to competitors on fair terms.
Allison Kirkby took over as President and CEO of Telia in May 2020, just as the world was hunkering down during the first wave of the Covid-19 pandemic. Her timing couldn't have been more challenging—or perhaps more opportune, given the acceleration of digital transformation during COVID.
VIII. The Transformation Era & Recent Developments (2020–Present)
Allison Kirkby was not the first CEO to attempt transforming Telia. But she brought a distinctive approach shaped by her experience at challenger operators Tele2 and TDC.
Allison Kirkby assumed the role as Telia Company President and CEO on May 4, 2020. She has led the company through a period of major transformation, implementing a renewed strategy focused on the Nordics and Baltics, and a return to growth across Telia's footprint.
Kirkby's transformation philosophy was customer-centric. What the company set out to do was a transformation that was for the first time customer experience-led and for the first time was not going to be just a short-term fix.
Telia Company announced its mobile network deals with Nokia and Ericsson, indicating that it will not be working with Huawei and ZTE. "Assuming we are successful in the upcoming Swedish spectrum auction we have the foundations in place to build the reliable 5G networks for the societies of the Nordics and the Baltics to benefit from. This kicks off a multiyear investment in our networks, ramping up in 2021," Allison Kirkby, CEO of Telia Company, said.
The operator has signed a four-year extension of its Radio Access Network (RAN) deal with Ericsson covering Sweden, Norway, Lithuania and Estonia, which promises to boost network speeds, capacity and coverage in the regions. Telia's 5G now covers 99.9 percent of Sweden's population.
But Kirkby's tenure would be brief. Just three weeks after its current CEO Philip Jansen informed the UK's largest telco company that he intended to step down from his role, BT has announced the appointment of Telia Company president and CEO Allison Kirkby as its new chief executive, who will take up the role around the end of January 2024 at the latest.
Telia Company today announces that its Board of Directors has appointed Patrik Hofbauer as President and CEO, effective February 1, 2024. Patrik, currently CEO of Svenska Spel, has extensive experience from previous leadership positions in telecommunications and media.
Hofbauer brought a different perspective—and a sharp critique of what he inherited. Shortly after taking on the CEO role, Hofbauer said he had individual chats with around 300 employees and went on to sum up their feedback. "[They told me] it's very difficult to work here at Telia and to get things done," he said. "Every time I need to do something, I need to ask at least five stakeholders or five other people, which hinders me and slows me down in my work." By moving decision-making closer to customers, and reducing the amount of line managers, Hofbauer thinks Telia will be in a much better position to "execute" strategic plans.
Telco group "lost control" of previous transformation project to centralise service and product development, according to Patrik Hofbauer, CEO of Telia. His scathing assessment was that Telia "lost control" of the centralised transformation project, mainly because it was too big. "We now need to back off from [that] and [become] much more localised," said Hofbauer.
The restructuring was dramatic. In 2024, Telia implemented a new country-led operating model. This aimed to decentralize its structure and maximize the value of its network infrastructure. This strategic shift, effective December 1, 2024, included a reduction of 3,000 positions. Anticipated annual savings are at least SEK 2.6 billion.
The media strategy reversal was equally decisive. TV channels including Sweden's TV4 and Finland's MTV are being sold to Schibsted Media after Telia Company announced plans to divest itself of its TV and media interests. The Oslo-based publishing company behind VG and Aftenposten in Norway, Aftonbladet and Svenska Dagbladet in Sweden will pay SEK 6.55 billion for the business. Telia acquired much of its broadcasting interests from Bonnier Broadcasting in December 2019 for SEK 9.2 billion.
Patrik Hofbauer, Telia Company President and CEO: "Our priority is to focus on what Telia does best – providing world-class connectivity on which millions of people rely every day – and this agreement clearly reflects that. We have an opportunity to secure a new home for TV & Media with a strategic long-term Nordic owner that can further develop the business while maintaining its editorial independence."
Telia Company has closed the sale of its TV & Media business to Schibsted, first announced in February, at an enterprise value of SEK 6.55 billion (€0.59bn) on a cash and debt-free basis. The media experiment had ended—profitable content ownership proved less valuable than focused connectivity excellence.
The company targets a service revenue Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 2% and an adjusted EBITDA CAGR of 4% for 2025-2027. Capital expenditures are projected to remain below SEK 14 billion annually. Free cash flow is targeted to reach at least SEK 10 billion by 2027.
IX. Playbook: Business & Investing Lessons
Telia's 170-year journey offers profound lessons for business strategists and investors alike.
The Curse and Blessing of State Ownership
The Swedish government's 39.5% stake creates both advantages and constraints. On the positive side: patient capital that doesn't demand quarterly performance optimization, national champion status providing regulatory access, and credibility with government customers. On the negative side: political interference (the Telenor merger collapsed partly due to political posturing), slower decision-making requiring government consultation, and governance challenges when public policy objectives conflict with shareholder value.
The Finnish government's complete exit from Telia—The Finnish government (through Solidium) divested from Telia Company in February 2018, when it sold its remaining 3.2% stake—provides an interesting contrast. Finland concluded that state ownership in a competitive telecom wasn't essential. Sweden's parliament debated similar divestiture but ultimately rejected it, ensuring continued government influence.
M&A Lessons Learned
Three merger experiences illuminate different paths:
The Telenor Disaster (1999): Ego and nationalism overwhelmed shareholder value. Two state-owned companies with similar cultures and complementary assets couldn't agree on where to locate headquarters. The lesson: equal mergers between proud national champions require explicit mechanisms for resolving symbolic disputes.
The Sonera Success (2002): To avoid the mistakes of the Telenor merger attempt, the two sides agreed to maintain their existing Finnish and Swedish operations more or less intact, creating a corporate headquarters in Stockholm only for companywide decisions. Telia and Sonera also agreed to bring in a "neutral" CEO with no connection to either firm. Learning from failure enabled success.
The Bonnier Broadcasting Experiment (2019-2025): The acquisition for SEK 9.2 billion and sale for SEK 6.55 billion represented a significant value destruction. Vertical integration into content didn't generate the differentiation benefits anticipated, while distracting management from core connectivity excellence.
Emerging Markets Temptation and Governance Failure
Sonera was in financial difficulties after several expensive purchases of European 3G licences. Telia had been more cautious and had the financial muscle to acquire Sonera. Telia avoided the 3G license bubble—but then made a worse mistake in Eurasia.
The $965 million corruption settlement illustrates how pursuit of growth in poorly governed markets can destroy value and reputation. The bribes generated $457 million in profits but cost $965 million in penalties, plus incalculable reputational damage, CEO departures, and strategic disruption.
Transformation Challenges
His scathing assessment was that Telia "lost control" of the centralised transformation project, mainly because it was too big. "We now need to back off from [that] and [become] much more localised."
The pendulum between centralization and decentralization has swung repeatedly at Telia. Kirkby centralized to build scale; Hofbauer decentralized to build agility. Multiple CEO transitions and strategic pivots suggest the company hasn't found a stable equilibrium.
X. Analysis: Porter's Five Forces & Hamilton's 7 Powers
Porter's Five Forces Analysis
| Force | Assessment | Key Factors |
|---|---|---|
| Threat of New Entrants | LOW-MEDIUM | Massive infrastructure requirements of €billions, spectrum licensing creates barriers, regulatory complexity deters foreign entrants. However, MVNOs and cloud-native service providers reduce barriers in specific segments |
| Bargaining Power of Suppliers | MEDIUM | Equipment suppliers limited to Ericsson and Nokia after Huawei/ZTE exclusion. Strategic partnerships create mutual dependency. Telia has negotiating leverage as major Nordic customer, but limited alternatives |
| Bargaining Power of Buyers | MEDIUM-HIGH | Consumer switching costs declining in mobile, price sensitivity increasing, business customers have alternatives. Bundling (connectivity + content, now abandoned) was an attempt to increase stickiness |
| Threat of Substitutes | MEDIUM-HIGH | OTT services (WhatsApp, Zoom) substitute for traditional voice/SMS. Cloud providers compete for enterprise connectivity. Fixed wireless substitutes for fiber in some segments |
| Competitive Rivalry | HIGH | The most important of Telia's Swedish competitors in these areas has been Tele2. This merger followed three years after Telia's failed merger attempt with Norwegian telecommunications company Telenor, now its chief competitor in the Nordic countries. Intense competition in all markets with established rivals |
Hamilton's 7 Powers Assessment
Scale Economies: âś“ Strong. Telia Company is the largest Nordic and Baltic fixed-voice, broadband, and mobile operator by revenue and customer base. Network infrastructure provides natural scale advantages in coverage and capacity.
Network Effects: Moderate. Direct network effects limited in telecom (interconnection ensures any-to-any calling). Indirect effects through ecosystem partners provide some advantage.
Counter-Positioning: Weak. Telia lacks a distinctive business model that competitors can't copy. All Nordic telecoms pursue similar convergence strategies.
Switching Costs: Moderate. Number portability reduced consumer switching costs. Enterprise customers have higher switching costs due to integration complexity. Bundle customers show lower churn.
Branding: Moderate. Strong brand recognition in home markets from monopoly heritage. Thanks to a multi-year distribution partnership, we will continue offering TV4 and MTV's content as part of the attractive line-up that has helped make Telia's TV customers the most satisfied in Sweden for nine of the past 10 years.
Cornered Resource: Limited. No unique spectrum positions or exclusive content after media divestiture. Network assets are significant but replicable over time.
Process Power: Developing. Sweden: Telia and Ericsson have jointly delivered Sweden's top-rated mobile network for five consecutive years, according to independent benchmarking firm umlaut. Telia's 5G now covers 99.9 percent of Sweden's population. Operational excellence provides some advantage.
Competitive Positioning
Telia occupies an interesting strategic position: the incumbent with the largest infrastructure footprint, competing against more agile challengers. Telia's cost structure is still heavier than that of peer Tele2 given its broader geographical presence and ties with the Swedish government.
The company's recent strategic clarity—exiting emerging markets, selling media assets, focusing on Nordic-Baltic connectivity—should help close the operational efficiency gap. But decades of monopoly culture don't transform overnight.
XI. Key Investment Considerations
Bull Case
Infrastructure Leader: Telia's 5G now covers 99.9 percent of Sweden's population. World-class network provides foundation for premium positioning and enterprise growth.
Strategic Clarity: After years of emerging market adventures and media experiments, Telia now focuses exclusively on Nordic-Baltic connectivity where it has genuine competitive advantages.
Operational Turnaround: This strategic shift included a reduction of 3,000 positions. Anticipated annual savings are at least SEK 2.6 billion. Cost structure improvements should drive margin expansion.
Attractive Returns: In line with recent years, the Board of Directors has stated its intention to propose dividends of SEK 2.00 per share for 2024. Strong dividend yield supported by stable cash flows.
Leverage Capacity: You're below your target at the moment. We have some acquisitions coming maybe in the next few months, but it feels like you'll still end up below your target range of 2 to 2.5 times. Balance sheet flexibility enables both dividends and growth investment.
Bear Case
Limited Growth: The company targets a service revenue Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 2%—essentially inflation-level growth in mature markets with stable or declining populations.
Competitive Pressure: Competitive pressures in markets like Finland and Norway have impacted service revenue. Challenger operators continue pressing on price and customer experience.
State Ownership Overhang: Of the stock, 39.5% is owned by the Swedish government, creating potential policy interference and limiting activist investor pressure for shareholder-friendly actions.
Transformation Execution Risk: Multiple CEO transitions and strategic pivots suggest organizational challenges. His scathing assessment was that Telia "lost control" of the centralised transformation project.
Capital Intensity: Continued 5G investment and fiber rollout require substantial ongoing capex, limiting free cash flow conversion.
Key Metrics to Watch
1. Service Revenue Growth by Country: Track particularly Sweden (largest market) and Lithuania/Estonia (highest growth potential). Divergent trends reveal competitive dynamics.
2. Adjusted EBITDA Margin: Adjusted EBITDA increased 3.6% to SEK 31,345 million (30,254) and the adjusted EBITDA margin increased to 35.2% (34.2). Margin expansion validates cost transformation; margin compression signals competitive or execution problems.
3. Free Cash Flow per Share: The company aims to achieve free cash flow above SEK 10 billion by 2027. This metric determines dividend sustainability and balance sheet flexibility.
Material Legal/Regulatory Considerations
The Uzbekistan corruption settlement is complete, but the legacy requires ongoing compliance monitoring. Swedish government ownership creates regulatory relationship advantages but also political complexity around any strategic transactions.
The recent announcement that On July 15, 2025, Government of Latvia announced that they plan to buy out Telia Company's shares of both LMT and Tet with help from Latvenergo and Latvian State Radio and Television Centre (LVRTC), to make both companies state-owned. Telia confirmed the sale on July 17 by signing a memorandum of understanding with Latvia demonstrates ongoing portfolio optimization but also some geographic retreat.
XII. Conclusion
Telia Company's 170-year journey from telegraph monopoly to Nordic telecom champion illustrates both the durability of infrastructure businesses and the challenges of adapting monopolist cultures to competitive markets.
The company navigated deregulation, survived a massive corruption scandal, and has refocused on markets where it can win. Telia is the incumbent telecom operator in Sweden. It also operates in Norway, Finland and the Baltic countries. In the past five years, Telia has been narrowing its business focus, divesting businesses in Asia and focusing on its core markets.
The current strategy under CEO Patrik Hofbauer represents perhaps the clearest strategic focus in decades: decentralized operations empowering country teams, world-class 5G networks built with Ericsson and Nokia, and pure-play connectivity after media divestiture.
For investors, Telia offers the classic European telecom proposition: stable cash flows, attractive dividends, and limited but steady growth in mature markets. The 39.5% state ownership creates unique governance dynamics but also provides long-term stability.
The key question is whether new leadership can close the operational efficiency gap with challengers like Tele2 while maintaining Telia's network quality advantages. The answers will emerge over the coming years as the transformation agenda executes—or encounters the same implementation challenges that stymied predecessors.
What remains undeniable is Telia's importance to the region it serves. From those first telegraph wires between Stockholm and Uppsala in 1853 to the 5G networks now covering 99.9% of Sweden's population, Telia has been—and remains—the backbone of Nordic connectivity. The question for investors is whether that irreplaceable infrastructure position translates to attractive returns in an era of mature markets and intense competition.
Spotify
Apple Podcasts
Amazon Music
Audible
YouTube
Castbox
Pocket Casts