Valero Energy: From Pipeline Pariah to America's Refining Giant

I. Introduction & Episode Roadmap

Picture this: It's 1973, and Texas is in the midst of an energy crisis that would make today's market volatility look tame. Natural gas prices are soaring, utilities are defaulting, and in a Houston courtroom, judges are desperately searching for someone—anyone—who can untangle one of the most complex energy disasters in American history. They tap a relatively unknown executive named Bill Greehey to lead a company called LoVaca Gathering, which owes $1.6 billion it can't pay. Most observers give him six months before the whole thing collapses.

Fast forward to today, and the company that emerged from that crisis—Valero Energy—sits at number 10 on the Fortune 500 with over $140 billion in annual revenue. It's America's largest independent refiner, processing 3.2 million barrels of oil per day across 15 refineries, and somehow, it's also become the country's largest producer of renewable diesel. How did a court-mandated spinoff born from disaster become North America's refining champion?

This is a story about counter-cyclical genius—buying refineries when everyone else thought the industry was dead. It's about an Iowa farm boy who built one of the most admired corporate cultures in America while ruthlessly consolidating a commodity business. And it's about a company that's managed to thrive through every energy transition thrown at it, from natural gas deregulation to the renewable revolution.

We'll trace Valero's journey from the LoVaca crisis that birthed it, through Bill Greehey's transformative leadership and the strategic acquisitions that built an empire. We'll examine how operational excellence became a competitive moat in a brutal commodity business, and we'll wrestle with the fundamental question facing Valero today: Can a fossil fuel refiner successfully pivot to become a renewable energy powerhouse, or is this the beginning of a long sunset?

The themes that emerge are timeless: how crisis creates opportunity, why culture beats strategy in commodity businesses, and what happens when you combine patient capital with perfect timing. This isn't just the story of an energy company—it's a masterclass in building enduring value in the most cyclical, capital-intensive, and politically charged industry in America.

↑ Back to Top

II. The LoVaca Crisis & Birth of Valero (1970s-1980)

The Corpus Christi courthouse was packed on that sweltering August day in 1973. Angry utility executives, furious customers, and nervous lawyers filled every seat as Judge Cox gaveled the proceedings to order. At the center of it all was LoVaca Gathering Company, a natural gas subsidiary of Houston's Coastal Corporation that had just committed what one attorney called "the largest commercial fraud in Texas history."

Here's what had happened: During the late 1960s, LoVaca had signed long-term contracts to supply natural gas to utilities across South Texas at fixed prices. When the 1973 Arab oil embargo sent energy prices soaring, LoVaca found itself locked into contracts at $0.30 per thousand cubic feet while spot prices hit $2.00. Rather than honor the contracts and go bankrupt, LoVaca's parent company Coastal States simply refused to deliver the gas. Utilities couldn't heat homes. Industries shut down. The Texas Railroad Commission declared an emergency. The litigation dragged on for years. When Lo-Vaca curtailed its gas supplies and raised prices during the energy crisis of the early 1970s, customers sued Coastal. Regulators ordered the subsidiary to refund $1.6 billion in 1977, and Coastal spun off Lo-Vaca as Valero Energy to finance the settlement. But who would lead this toxic asset? Who could possibly negotiate with 400 angry creditors who wanted blood?

Enter Bill Greehey. In 1973 the courts appointed Greehey as LoVaca's CEO and president and charged him with negotiating a settlement, which many industry analysts believed would be an impossible task. This wasn't a promotion—it was more like being handed a live grenade. LoVaca, with a 40 percent employee turnover rate and operating losses each month of $2 million, faced lawsuits by San Antonio, Austin, and other cities affected by the contracts. Greehey took a big risk leaving a secure position to head an entity on the brink of bankruptcy.

But Greehey had a different view. Where others saw disaster, he saw opportunity. Immediately, Greehey stabilized his workforce, laying out the company's goals and objectives. Within two months, the company was making $2 million a month instead of losing that amount. Then came the hard part: convincing 400 utilities to accept a settlement that would create an entirely new company.

Next, Greehey met with customers and proposed a settlement that included spinning off LoVaca. For the next six years, he worked to get 400 customers to agree to a $1.6 billion settlement. His efforts finally paid off with the creation of Valero on January 1, 1980.

The structure was ingenious: The spinoff, Valero Energy Corporation, which was formed on December 31, 1979, from LoVaca and other Coastal assets, had annual revenues of about $1 billion. The customers suing Coastal received 55 percent of Valero's stock, with the remaining split among Coastal shareholders, not including Wyatt. Oscar Wyatt, the controversial founder of Coastal, was explicitly excluded from any ownership—the plaintiffs wouldn't settle otherwise.

The court appointed Greehey CEO of Valero Energy Corp., a name he chose after Mission San Antonio de Valero, the original name of the Alamo. Valero was created on Jan. 1, 1980 and San Antonio chosen as its headquarters. The symbolism wasn't lost on anyone: like the defenders of the Alamo, this company would have to fight against overwhelming odds. But unlike the Alamo, Greehey intended to win.

↑ Back to Top

III. Bill Greehey: From Iowa Farm Boy to Energy Titan

Born in 1936 in Fort Dodge, Iowa, Bill Greehey grew up in an ethnically diverse neighborhood on the south side of town. Nearly everyone he knew, including his father, worked at the gypsum mill, mostly for minimum wage. "We had a roof over our heads, but not much more," says Greehey.

The poverty was grinding, but it wasn't the poverty that shaped young Bill—it was watching his mother's relentless entrepreneurial spirit. When he was very young, Greehey's mother cleaned houses, but she was ambitious and tried her hand at several small businesses, including a bakery, a fish market, and a small restaurant. She never made much money at any of those enterprises, but her son admired her energy and drive.

Even though they lived in poverty, Greehey says his home was filled with love. His family was active in a close-knit community that put the church at the center of all they did. No one had indoor plumbing, and no one thought much about the future. But Bill was different. By age 12, he was working odd jobs to help support the family, developing a work ethic that would become legendary in corporate America. Greehey graduated from Fort Dodge Senior High School in 1954. He then served with the US Air Force for four years and was based at Lackland AFB, in San Antonio, Texas. The Air Force changed everything. For a kid who'd never left Iowa, San Antonio was a revelation—warm weather, economic opportunity, and a booming military-industrial complex.

In 1954, he joined the U.S. Air Force and served at Lackland Air Force Base in San Antonio, Texas, for the next three and a half years. With the help of the GI Bill, he enrolled in St. Mary's University in San Antonio soon after his honorable discharge in 1958. By then, Greehey was married and had two children. He needed money and worked full time at night and on weekends parking cars at a local hospital. He attended his classes during the day. Still, his precarious financial situation forced him to finish his education as quickly as possible. He attended full time in summers and earned a degree in accounting with honors in less than three years.

Think about that for a moment: parking cars at night, attending classes during the day, with a wife and two kids at home, and still graduating with honors in under three years. This wasn't just determination—it was desperation channeled into excellence.

Greehey's first job out of college was as an accountant for Price Waterhouse. Upon learning that a college education yielded his son a job making only $450 a month, his father told Greehey that he could have made more at home working for the mill or the meatpacking plant. But Greehey saw what his father couldn't: the trajectory, not just the starting point.

After a year with Price Waterhouse, Greehey left to work in the internal auditing department of Exxon. He enjoyed his job, but two years later, Coastal Corp. offered him the chance to work in its finance division. The company had just issued $50 million in bonds, and it had a bond indenture that no one in the company understood. Greehey was put in an office with a thick mortgage and deed of trust book and was told to become familiar with it. Within months, Greehey was giving bond indenture presentations to the board of directors, an opportunity that never would have come his way had he not taken on a job no one else wanted.

This became Greehey's signature move: taking on the impossible jobs that everyone else avoided. By the time Greehey was 32, he was corporate controller. Three years later, he was senior vice president of finance. In just five years, he'd gone from the guy nobody wanted to talk to about bond indentures to running finance for a major energy company.

But it was his leadership philosophy that would truly set him apart. In a speech that he gave at St. Mary's University, his alma mater, Greehey talked about his definition of leadership. "A true leader has the confidence to stand alone, the courage to make tough decisions, and the compassion to listen to the needs of others," he said. "He does not set out to be a leader but becomes one by the quality of his actions and the integrity of his intent."

Mr. Greehey previously served as Chairman and CEO of Valero Energy Corporation from the company's inception in 1980 until he retired as CEO in January 2006, and then retired as Chairman in January 2007. Under Mr. Greehey's direction, Valero was consistently ranked one of the "100 Best Companies to Work For" by Fortune magazine, rising to No. 3 in 2006, the year he retired. This wasn't just corporate PR—Greehey built something revolutionary in the cutthroat world of oil refining: a company people actually wanted to work for.

In 2012, The Harvard Business Review named Mr. Greehey one of the best-performing CEOs in the world based on his tenure as CEO of Valero. Not bad for a farm boy from Iowa who started by parking cars to pay for college.

↑ Back to Top

IV. Early Struggles & The Refinery Gamble (1980-1990)

The morning of January 2, 1980—Valero's first official business day—Bill Greehey walked into his new San Antonio headquarters with a company that owned some natural gas pipelines, a small marine terminal, and not much else. What he did have was $550 million in debt from the settlement and a mandate to somehow make this work. The smart money said he'd be bankrupt within two years. In April 1981, the company acquired Corpus Christi Marine Services Company, a small barge company in Corpus Christi, Texas, when it purchased a stake in Saber Energy Inc. of Houston. But the real gamble came next. In 1981, Valero began construction on what would become its first grassroots refinery in Corpus Christi—the west plant. The projected cost: $100 million. The timing: terrible. By 1983, Texas was in a severe recession. A sharp regional recession in the southwestern United States and Texas, caused by a drop in oil prices, caused a fall in the value of commercial real estate in those areas. Texas was the epicenter of the thrift industry meltdown. Oil prices had collapsed from $39 per barrel in 1980 to under $15 by 1986. Banks were failing across the state. Construction projects sat half-finished. And here was Valero, trying to build a refinery.

The construction costs spiraled out of control. What started as a $100 million project ballooned to over $750 million. By 1983, Valero had taken on $550 million in debt, the project was behind schedule, and the company was hemorrhaging cash. Industry observers started making bets on when, not if, Valero would declare bankruptcy.

Valero commissioned the grass-roots Bill Greehey refinery in 1983, now referred to as the West plant. As the last grassroots refinery built in the U.S., Valero's Corpus Christi investment is labeled the "Refinery of the Future." To this day, it is one of the most complex, technologically advanced refineries in the world.

But Greehey had designed something revolutionary. While everyone else was building simple refineries that could only process light, sweet crude oil, Greehey built complexity. The Corpus Christi refinery could handle heavy, sour crude—the stuff nobody wanted because it was harder to refine. This meant Valero could buy its feedstock at a significant discount to light crude prices. When oil prices were high, this spread was worth millions. When they were low, it was worth survival.

The early results were catastrophic. In May 1985, Valero Refining and Marketing Company was born from Valero's subsidiary, Saber Energy Inc., but the company was losing money at an alarming rate. By late spring 1985, more favorable conditions began to lift Valero's prospects slightly, but the damage was done. The company needed radical restructuring.

In early 1987, Greehey made a crucial decision: separate the profitable gas business from the money-losing refinery. This wasn't just financial engineering—it was triage. The gas business could generate steady cash flow to keep the refinery afloat while oil markets recovered. It was the corporate equivalent of amputating a limb to save the patient.

Then came 1988, and suddenly the climate for petroleum refining improved. Valero ended the year with $30.6 million in profits. The refinery that almost killed the company was suddenly its crown jewel. The Corpus Christi refinery had been commissioned as the "Refinery of the Future," and now it was starting to look like Greehey might have been right.

But the real crisis was yet to come. Fast forward to 2009, and history repeated itself with a vengeance. In 2009, it was reported that Valero lost an average $1 million per day since the beginning of the year. In November of that year, the company was forced to lay off 500 employees, and subsequently began to permanently shut down its refinery in Delaware City, Delaware. The financial crisis had crushed refining margins, and Valero was bleeding out.

Yet somehow, both times—in the 1980s and 2009—Valero survived when competitors died. The difference wasn't luck. It was Greehey's insistence on building financial flexibility into the business model. Complex refineries that could switch feedstocks. Geographic diversity. Counter-cyclical retail operations. Employee ownership that reduced turnover during downturns. These weren't accidents—they were design features of a company built to survive catastrophe.

↑ Back to Top

V. Strategic Pivot & First Wave of Growth (1990s-2000)

By 1991, Valero was a different company. Valero's earnings reached $98.7 million on revenues of more than $1 billion in 1991. The refinery that nearly bankrupted them was now printing money, and Greehey was ready to go shopping. But first, he had to survive his own succession crisis.

In 1996, after 16 years at the helm, Greehey decided he'd had enough. At 60, he told Valero's board he wanted to retire. "I'd made a lot of sacrifices," he later recalled. He'd built a billion-dollar company from the ashes of a legal settlement, survived two near-death experiences, and wanted to enjoy life.

Greehey retired as the company's CEO in 1996, but his retirement lasted only four months, as his replacement, who had become CEO on June 30, 1996, resigned following a board meeting. The details of what happened in that board meeting have never been made public, but the result was clear: Greehey was back, and this time he had a new vision.

The timing was perfect. By the mid-1990s, refining was at the bottom of a cycle and refineries were cheap. "We could buy at 10 cents on the dollar," Greehey said. While integrated oil companies were selling refineries to focus on exploration and production, Greehey was buying everything he could get his hands on. The real masterstroke came in 1997. Pacific Gas & Electric Corp. offered to acquire Valero Energy Corp.'s gas unit in a deal valued at $1.5 billion. But this wasn't just a sale—it was financial engineering at its finest. Valero agreed to merge its natural gas-related service business with PG&E Corporation and spin off its refining assets into a new public corporation still known today as Valero Energy Corporation.

Think about what Greehey pulled off here: he took a company that was originally a settlement for a natural gas disaster, sold the natural gas business for $1.5 billion, and kept the refinery that almost bankrupted them. It was like selling your house but keeping the garage, then turning that garage into a mansion.

The timing was exquisite. Acquiring gas assets was particularly important to electric utilities in California, where deregulation was proceeding at a rapid pace. Since last summer, a total of six $1 billion-plus combinations of utilities and gas pipelines/distributors had been proposed. Greehey sold into a feeding frenzy.

Armed with cash from the PG&E deal, Greehey immediately went shopping. That same year, Valero acquires three new refineries from Basis Petroleum, two in Texas (Houston and Texas City) and one in Louisiana (Krotz Springs), becoming the largest independent refining company on the Gulf Coast.

But the real transformation came from Greehey's strategic philosophy. Greehey's strategy was to build sophisticated units at some refineries that could process heavy crude oil that was cheaper to acquire than light, sweet crude. The ability to refine less costly heavy crude gave Valero an edge against competitors.

This wasn't just about buying cheap feedstock. Heavy crude refineries require massive capital investment in coking units, hydrocrackers, and desulfurization equipment. Most companies avoided this complexity. Greehey embraced it. When oil prices were high, the spread between heavy and light crude widened, and Valero's margins exploded. When prices were low, Valero could still make money while competitors bled. The year 2000 marked another pivotal moment. Valero purchased the Benicia, California, refinery and interest in 350 Exxon-branded service stations in California, mainly in the San Francisco Bay Area. The acquisition cost $895 million plus about $120 million in inventories—over a billion dollars for a single refinery and some gas stations.

But Greehey saw what others missed. "The retail business is a natural growth area for Valero, because retail margins tend to be countercyclical to those in refining," Greehey said. When refining margins compressed, retail margins expanded. When retail struggled, refining bounced back. It was a natural hedge that most pure-play refiners lacked.

The Benicia acquisition also marked Valero's entry into California's reformulated gasoline market, which typically sold for substantial premiums above US Gulf Coast prices. Nearly 70% of the refinery's output was gasoline, primarily the cleaner-burning California Air Resources Board-specification fuel required for the California market. Another 16% of the refinery's production was low-sulfur diesel and jet fuel, which also generally sold for premium prices.

This geographic and product diversification would prove crucial. By spreading operations from the Gulf Coast to California to the East Coast, Valero could arbitrage regional price differences. When hurricanes shut down Gulf Coast refineries, California operations printed money. When California had regulatory issues, Texas carried the load.

The transformation was remarkable. In just three years from 1997 to 2000, Valero went from a regional Texas refiner with one complex refinery to a national player with operations spanning the continent. Revenue exploded from under $2 billion to over $14 billion. The company that almost died building one refinery was now one of America's largest independent refiners. And Greehey was just getting started.

↑ Back to Top

VI. The Ultramar Diamond Shamrock Mega-Deal (2001)

Bill Greehey walked into the boardroom at Valero's San Antonio headquarters on a September morning in 2001 with a proposal that made his directors' jaws drop. He wanted to buy Ultramar Diamond Shamrock—a company three times Valero's size—for $6 billion. The deal would be the equivalent of a snake swallowing an elephant. Ultramar Diamond Shamrock wasn't just big—it was a colossus. With seven refineries in the US and Canada, over 5,000 retail outlets, and revenues of $17 billion, UDS was everything Valero wasn't: a massive retail presence, international operations, and a brand portfolio that included Ultramar, Diamond Shamrock, Beacon, and Total stations. The transaction was valued at $6 billion, which includes $4 billion in equity and $2 billion in assumed debt.

The deal faced immediate skepticism. "We're combining the two best independent refining and marketing companies to make the premier refiner and marketer in the US," Greehey said. But Wall Street wasn't buying it. How could a company with $15 billion in revenue absorb one with $17 billion? The cultural challenges alone seemed insurmountable.

The FTC had its own concerns. According to the complaint, the merger as originally proposed would have lessened competition in two refining markets in California, resulting in consumers paying more than $150 million annually if the price of CARB gasoline increased just one cent per gallon. The consent order permitted Valero to complete its $6 billion merger but required the divestiture of Ultramar's Golden Eagle Refinery, bulk gasoline contracts, and 70 Ultramar retail service stations in Northern California.

But Greehey saw synergies where others saw chaos. "We're excited to substantially grow our retail presence because retail margins are counter-cyclical to refining margins, so in the event we experience lower refining margins, retail margins will help stabilize our earnings," he explained. The combined company would have 13 refineries with a total throughput capacity of nearly 2 million barrels per day, making it the second largest refiner in the US behind only ExxonMobil.

The integration was brutal. The combined company would have 23,000 employees in the US and Canada. Two corporate cultures, two systems, two ways of doing everything had to be merged. But Greehey had a secret weapon: culture. Under his leadership, Valero had built one of the strongest corporate cultures in America. Rather than impose Valero's way on UDS, Greehey cherry-picked the best practices from both companies.

The retail network was particularly transformative. UDS brought more than 5,000 retail outlets in the US and Canada, including one of the largest home heating oil businesses in North America, supplying 250,000 households. This wasn't just about gas stations—it was about creating a vertically integrated energy company that could capture margins at every step from refinery to retail pump.

The deal also brought something unexpected: This solidifies Valero's foothold as one of the nation's top refining and marketing companies, and expands its retail and branded wholesale networks to approximately 4,700 sites. The deal also gives Valero a stake in a midstream logistics business, later named Valero LP, which was spun off in 2006 and renamed NuStar Energy LP. This logistics subsidiary would eventually become a multi-billion dollar company in its own right.

Geographic diversity exploded overnight. The merger brought six more refineries into Valero's portfolio: Ardmore, Oklahoma; Wilmington, California; Denver, Colorado; McKee (Sunray, Texas) and Three Rivers, Texas; and Lévis, Quebec (later named Jean Gaulin Refinery). Valero went from a US company to a North American powerhouse with significant Canadian operations.

The financial engineering was equally impressive. The total consideration to be paid to UDS stockholders equated to a fixed exchange of 1.228 shares of Valero common stock for half of the outstanding shares of UDS common stock and $55/share in cash for the remaining shares. This structure allowed UDS shareholders to choose their preferred form of payment while managing Valero's balance sheet.

By the time the dust settled on December 31, 2001, Valero had transformed from a large independent refiner into an energy giant. With this acquisition, Valero will have revenues of $32 billion/year and total assets of more than $10 billion. The company that started as a legal settlement was now number 15 on the Fortune 500.

↑ Back to Top

VII. The Premcor Acquisition & Becoming #1 (2005)

The conference call on April 25, 2005, started like any other quarterly earnings call. Analysts dialed in expecting updates on refining margins and capital expenditure plans. What they got instead was Bill Greehey announcing the largest acquisition in Valero's history: an $8 billion purchase of Premcor Inc. that would make Valero North America's largest refiner. "This transaction is one of the largest and most strategic acquisitions in Valero's history," Bill Greehey told analysts. "We are acquiring several very strategic refineries for significantly less than their combined replacement value, and we'll be improving the profitability of these plants by capturing synergies, improving their reliability and yields, and increasing their capacities."

The numbers were staggering. Adding Premcor's refineries in Port Arthur, Texas; Memphis, Tennessee; Delaware City, Delaware; and Lima, Ohio would give Valero 19 refineries with a total throughput capacity of 3.3 million barrels per day. With this acquisition, Valero will have total assets of $25 billion and annual revenues of nearly $70 billion, which would rank it No. 15 on the current listing of the Fortune 500.

The Port Arthur refinery alone was a jewel—250,000 barrels per day capacity with a replacement value of approximately $4.4 billion. Valero was paying a fraction of that. "We have improved our leverage to product margins and further enhanced our sour crude processing capabilities," Greehey said. "We are in a new era for refining where I believe you will continue to see higher highs and higher lows for both product margins and sour crude discounts."

The timing was, once again, perfect. According to Greehey, Valero expects sour crude discounts to be at least 46% better in 2005 than they were in 2004, which would improve the company's operating income by $1.6 billion this year. On top of that, there was limited refining capacity to meet growing demand for refined products. "Even if major expansion projects were put in place today, it would take four to five years to complete the engineering, get the necessary permits and build the units," Greehey explained.

The financial engineering was sophisticated. Under the terms of the merger agreement, Premcor shareholders had the right to receive either 0.99 shares of Valero common stock, or $72.76 in cash for each share of Premcor stock they owned, or a combination of the two, subject to pro-ration so that 50% of the total Premcor shares were acquired for cash. The $8 billion price tag comprised 46.7 million shares of Valero stock, valued at roughly $3.5 billion, and $3.4 billion financed with cash and bank debt. Valero also assumed $1.8 billion in Premcor's existing debt.

But this wasn't just about size—it was about strategic positioning. "This acquisition gives us the best geographic diversity among U.S. refiners with a presence in all of the major refining regions, which further increases our earnings stability," Greehey noted. The Midwest refineries in particular gave Valero access to Canadian crude oil and the growing ethanol market.

The integration went smoother than anyone expected. "We are finding more synergy opportunities than expected, like with Ultramar Diamond Shamrock," Greehey told investors six months later. The company identified over $300 million in annual synergies, primarily from operational improvements and economies of scale.

The deal closed on September 1, 2005, making Valero the largest refining company in North America with 18 refineries (after one divestiture). Valero's crude capacity now totaled 2.7 million barrels per day. The farm boy from Iowa who started parking cars to pay for college now ran the largest independent refinery system in North America.

"2005 is shaping up to be another year of record earnings for Valero. And, with such strong fundamentals and this great acquisition, our future has never looked brighter," Greehey said. He was right. Valero's net income for 2005 would reach $3.6 billion, nearly double the previous year. The company that almost went bankrupt building one refinery now operated 18 of them profitably.

But Greehey, now 69, knew his time was coming to an end. In January 2006, he would step down as CEO, though he remained chairman until 2007. His successor would inherit an empire built on crisis, sustained by culture, and perfected through timing. The question was whether anyone could replicate Greehey's magic touch in the volatile world of oil refining.

↑ Back to Top

VIII. International Expansion & Renewable Pivot (2006-Present)

Bill Greehey's retirement party in January 2007 at the Majestic Theatre in downtown San Antonio was more coronation than farewell. After 27 years building Valero from a court-ordered settlement into America's largest refiner, he was leaving behind a company valued at over $30 billion. But as the applause died down and the new leadership took over, the energy world was about to undergo its most dramatic transformation since the 1970s oil crisis.

The timing of Greehey's exit was either brilliant or lucky—probably both. Within two years, the 2008 financial crisis would devastate refining margins. In 2009, it was reported that Valero lost an average $1 million per day since the beginning of the year. In November of that year, the company was forced to lay off 500 employees and subsequently began to permanently shut down its refinery in Delaware City, Delaware.

But Valero's new leadership had learned Greehey's most important lesson: crisis creates opportunity. While competitors retrenched, Valero went shopping in an entirely unexpected direction. In 2009, Valero Energy Corporation entered the ethanol market by acquiring 7 ethanol plants in March, and another 3 ethanol plants, purchased in December, all located in the Midwest of the United States. The contrarian move raised eyebrows—why was an oil refiner buying corn ethanol plants?

The answer became clear in 2011 with an even bolder move. Valero Energy Corporation entered into a joint venture with a subsidiary of Darling Ingredients Inc. to establish Diamond Green Diesel Holdings (DGD). This venture resulted in the construction of a renewable diesel plant adjacent to Valero's refinery in St. Charles, Louisiana. The initial capacity was just 10,000 barrels per day, tiny by refinery standards. But Valero saw what others missed: renewable diesel could be processed through existing refinery infrastructure, sold through existing distribution networks, and commanded premium prices due to government mandates. The same year as the renewable diesel venture, Valero made another contrarian move. On March 11, 2011, Valero announced that it had agreed to a major European purchase from Chevron Corp., Chevron's Pembroke Refinery in Wales together with marketing and logistical assets throughout the United Kingdom and Ireland. The acquisition cost was $730 million plus approximately $1 billion in working capital.

The Pembroke plant is one of the largest and most complex refineries in Western Europe with a total throughput capacity of 270,000 barrels per day and a Nelson complexity index rating of 11.8. It also came with ownership interests in four major pipelines and eleven fuel terminals, a 14,000-barrel-per-day aviation fuel business, and a network of more than 1,000 Texaco-branded wholesale sites.

"We have been looking for some time to expand and improve our portfolio of assets, but only if we could get an attractive price for assets that would add significant long-term value for our shareholders," said Valero Chairman and CEO Bill Klesse. "The Pembroke refinery remained profitable and cash-flow positive even during the depths of the economic downturn in 2009."

The European acquisition marked a strategic shift. After exiting refining in the U.S. East Coast in 2010 by selling refineries in Delaware City and Paulsboro, Valero could now supply that market from Wales when Atlantic Basin economics made it profitable. It was classic Valero: exit high-cost operations, acquire low-cost assets, and arbitrage the difference.

Meanwhile, the renewable strategy was accelerating. In 2013, Valero spun off its retail operations into a new publicly traded company, CST Brands. CFO Mike Ciskowski stated "We believe the separation of our retail business by way of a tax-efficient distribution to our shareholders will create operational flexibility within the business and unlock value for our shareholders." The spinoff freed up capital for renewable investments while maintaining fuel supply agreements.

The Diamond Green Diesel venture kept expanding. In 2021, DGD began expansion of the DGD St. Charles plant and increased its renewable diesel capacity to 700 million gallons annually. In 2022, the second DGD plant, located next to Valero's refinery in Port Arthur, Texas, began operations. The two renewable diesel plants now produce approximately 1.2 billion gallons per year, making Valero one of the world's leading renewable diesel producers.

The most recent transformation came in 2023-2024 with the completion of Valero's Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) project at DGD Port Arthur. With 235 million gallons per year of SAF capacity, Valero positioned itself as a critical supplier to airlines scrambling to meet carbon reduction targets. The timing was impeccable—just as corporate ESG mandates and government regulations were creating unprecedented demand for sustainable jet fuel.

But not all bets paid off. In January 2025, Valero announced the shutdown of its Benicia refinery—the same California facility it had acquired for over $1 billion in 2000. After recording $1.1 billion in impairment costs, the company acknowledged what many had suspected: California's regulatory environment had become untenable for traditional refining. The state that once provided premium margins had regulated them away.

Today, Valero stands as a paradox: the largest global independent refiner with 15 petroleum refineries processing 3.2 million barrels per day, and simultaneously America's largest producer of renewable fuels with 2 renewable diesel plants and 12 ethanol facilities. It's a company straddling two energy worlds, trying to maximize cash flows from fossil fuels while building credibility in renewables. The question isn't whether this strategy can work—it's for how long.

↑ Back to Top

IX. Modern Operations & Business Model

Step inside Valero's command center in San Antonio, and you're looking at the nerve center of North America's most complex refining network. Screens display real-time data from 15 refineries spanning the Gulf Coast, Mid-Continent, West Coast, and Northeast, plus operations in Canada and the UK. Each facility is a multi-billion dollar chemistry set, turning crude oil into everything from gasoline to jet fuel to asphalt.

The geographic footprint is strategic, not accidental. Gulf Coast refineries—including Corpus Christi, Port Arthur, Houston, Texas City, Three Rivers, and St. Charles—process 1.9 million barrels per day, predominantly heavy sour crude from Mexico, Venezuela, and increasingly, Canadian oil sands. These facilities sit near the Houston Ship Channel and Louisiana offshore oil production, minimizing transportation costs while maximizing access to export markets.

The Mid-Continent refineries—McKee, Ardmore, Memphis—process 460,000 barrels per day, strategically positioned to access both Canadian crude via pipeline and Permian Basin production. The West Coast operations, even after Benicia's closure, maintain critical market presence. The Wilmington refinery alone processes 135,000 barrels per day for the Los Angeles market, where California's unique gasoline specifications create natural barriers to entry.

But it's the feedstock flexibility that truly differentiates Valero. With a Nelson Complexity Index averaging 12.1 across its portfolio—well above the U.S. average of 9.5—Valero's refineries can process the heaviest, sourest crudes that trade at substantial discounts to West Texas Intermediate. When Maya heavy crude from Mexico trades at a $10 discount to WTI, that's $32 million in daily feedstock savings across the system.

The renewable diesel operations represent a different economic model entirely. Diamond Green Diesel's two plants don't compete with petroleum refineries—they complement them. Processing waste fats, cooking oils, and increasingly, soybean oil, these facilities produce 1.2 billion gallons of renewable diesel annually, capturing both premium California Low Carbon Fuel Standard credits and federal Renewable Identification Numbers (RINs). In 2023 alone, these credits generated over $2 billion in additional revenue.

The ethanol segment, with 12 plants producing 1.6 billion gallons annually, operates on razor-thin margins but provides critical flexibility. When corn prices spike, production throttles back. When gasoline blending economics improve, the plants run full. It's optionality at industrial scale.

Capital allocation has become increasingly disciplined post-Greehey. Of the $3.5 billion in annual capital expenditure, roughly 60% goes to sustaining operations—the mandatory turnarounds, catalyst replacements, and safety upgrades that keep refineries running. The remaining 40% splits between growth projects and renewable investments, with hurdle rates of 15% IRR for petroleum projects and 12% for renewables, reflecting their different risk profiles.

The crack spread—the difference between crude oil prices and refined product prices—remains the fundamental driver of profitability. When Gulf Coast 3-2-1 crack spreads (3 barrels of crude yielding 2 barrels of gasoline and 1 of diesel) exceed $25 per barrel, Valero prints money. When they compress below $15, the company relies on its complexity, feedstock flexibility, and renewable operations to maintain margins.

But the real moat isn't physical assets—it's operational excellence. Valero's refineries consistently achieve 95%+ utilization rates, well above the 90% industry average. Unplanned downtime costs $1-2 million per day per refinery; superior reliability translates directly to the bottom line. The company's Process Safety Management program, developed after several high-profile industry accidents, has reduced serious incidents by 75% over the past decade.

The logistics network—often overlooked—provides crucial competitive advantage. Valero owns or has long-term leases on 7,000 miles of pipeline, 100 million barrels of storage capacity, and 50 marine terminals. This infrastructure allows the company to arbitrage regional price differences, store products during margin troughs, and ensure feedstock supply during disruptions. When Hurricane Harvey shut down Houston refineries in 2017, Valero's logistics network allowed it to maintain operations at facilities outside the storm's path while competitors scrambled for supply.

↑ Back to Top

X. Playbook: Business & Investing Lessons

The Valero story offers a masterclass in building value in commodity businesses—industries where most companies destroy capital over time. The lessons transcend energy and apply to any capital-intensive, cyclical industry.

Counter-Cyclical M&A: The Art of Buying When Others Are Selling

Greehey's genius wasn't just buying assets cheaply—it was having the capital and courage to buy when everyone else was selling. The Ultramar Diamond Shamrock acquisition closed in December 2001, three months after 9/11 when airline traffic had collapsed. Premcor was acquired in 2005 when refining was considered a sunset industry. The European assets came in 2011 during the eurozone crisis. Each time, Valero paid fractions of replacement cost for world-class assets.

The key insight: In commodity businesses, the best assets come to market during the worst times. Companies that maintain financial flexibility—low leverage, diverse funding sources, strong cash generation—can exploit these dislocations. Valero never let its debt-to-capital ratio exceed 35%, even during major acquisitions, preserving the ability to strike when opportunities emerged.

Operational Excellence as Competitive Advantage

In commoditized industries, operational excellence isn't just important—it's existential. Valero's relentless focus on reliability, safety, and efficiency created a sustainable competitive advantage in an industry where most players operate similar assets. The difference between 95% and 90% utilization rates across a 3.2 million barrel per day system equals $500 million in annual profit at typical margins.

The company's approach was systematic: standardized processes across all facilities, predictive maintenance using AI and machine learning, and a safety culture that empowered any employee to shut down operations if they observed unsafe conditions. This wasn't corporate rhetoric—it was embedded in compensation structures, promotion decisions, and daily operations.

The Power of Scale in Commodity Businesses

Scale in refining provides advantages beyond simple unit economics. Large refiners can optimize crude purchasing across multiple facilities, shift production between refineries based on regional margins, and spread fixed costs across more barrels. But Valero discovered something more subtle: scale enables complexity.

Building a coker unit—which upgrades heavy oil residue into higher-value products—costs $500 million regardless of size. For a 100,000 barrel per day refinery, that's prohibitive. For a 3.2 million barrel per day system, it's a rounding error. This complexity arbitrage allowed Valero to process cheaper crudes while maintaining higher yields than simpler competitors.

Managing Regulatory and Environmental Challenges

The 2024 Bay Area Air Quality Management District fine of $82 million—the largest in the District's history—illustrates the escalating regulatory challenges facing refiners. But Valero's response revealed sophisticated stakeholder management. Rather than fight the fine, the company negotiated a settlement that included $42 million for environmental projects benefiting local communities.

This approach—accepting regulatory reality while maintaining social license to operate—has become essential. Valero spends over $500 million annually on environmental compliance and has reduced emissions intensity by 30% since 2010. The lesson: In highly regulated industries, compliance isn't a cost center—it's a competitive moat that keeps out new entrants.

Building and Maintaining Social License

Greehey understood something most commodity executives miss: employees and communities are stakeholders, not costs. Valero's consistent ranking among Fortune's "100 Best Companies to Work For" wasn't corporate window dressing—it translated to 50% lower turnover rates than industry average, saving tens of millions in training costs and preventing operational disruptions.

The company's approach was multifaceted: profit-sharing that distributed 10% of profits to employees, comprehensive health benefits that exceeded industry standards, and community investment programs that made Valero the largest corporate donor in San Antonio. When hurricanes hit the Gulf Coast, Valero employees worked round-the-clock to restore operations because they owned equity in the company's success.

Balancing Fossil Fuel Cash Flows with Renewable Investments

The renewable pivot represents a delicate balance. Petroleum refining generates the cash flows—$8 billion in EBITDA in strong years—that fund renewable investments. But every dollar invested in renewable diesel or sustainable aviation fuel is a dollar not returned to shareholders or invested in traditional refining.

Valero's solution has been portfolio optimization: investing in renewables that leverage existing infrastructure (renewable diesel uses refinery hydrotreaters), focusing on compliance-driven markets where mandates ensure demand, and maintaining return hurdles that prevent empire-building. The company has explicitly stated it won't chase growth in renewables at the expense of returns.

Employee Ownership Culture and Retention

The numbers tell the story: Valero employees own approximately 20% of company stock through 401(k) and employee stock purchase plans. When refining margins spike and the stock rises, warehouse workers and refinery operators see their net worth increase alongside executives. This alignment creates a culture of ownership that manifests in countless small decisions—maintaining equipment better, optimizing operations more carefully, reducing waste more aggressively.

↑ Back to Top

XI. Analysis & Bear vs. Bull Case**

Bull Case:**

The bull thesis for Valero rests on five pillars that could drive substantial value creation over the next decade.

First, Valero's stock closed at $137.93 as of August 19, 2025, well below its all-time high of $175.18 reached on April 5, 2024, suggesting significant upside potential if market conditions improve. The company's unmatched scale as North America's largest independent refiner provides structural advantages—from crude purchasing power to operational flexibility—that smaller competitors simply cannot replicate.

Second, analysts anticipate an improving backdrop for 2025, with seasonality typically driving improved margins in the first half of the year, and demand growth expected to outpace net capacity additions. This supply-demand dynamic could drive crack spreads significantly higher from current depressed levels.

Third, Valero's renewable diesel leadership positions it as a beneficiary, not victim, of the energy transition. With 1.2 billion gallons of renewable diesel capacity and the recently completed SAF facility capable of 235 million gallons annually, Valero captures both premium product prices and government credits worth billions annually. Unlike pure-play renewable companies burning cash, Valero funds these investments from petroleum cash flows.

Fourth, despite 2024 revenue of $123.97 billion representing a 10.81% decline and earnings falling 68.64% to $2.76 billion, the company maintained its dividend and buyback programs, demonstrating resilient cash generation even in challenging markets. Management's commitment to returning 40-50% of cash flow to shareholders through cycles provides downside protection.

Fifth, the potential for strategic M&A remains compelling. With several smaller refiners trading at distressed valuations and potential regulatory-driven exits in states like California, Valero could replicate its historical playbook of acquiring assets at fractions of replacement cost.

Bear Case:

The bear thesis centers on structural headwinds that could permanently impair Valero's business model.

Most fundamentally, Valero's refining margin per barrel plummeted from $12.89 in Q4 2023 to $8.44 in Q4 2024, and weak crack spreads led to breakeven or negative EBITDA for higher-cost refiners in the fourth quarter of 2024. If these margin pressures persist due to global oversupply and weakening demand, even Valero's operational excellence may not generate acceptable returns.

The long-term demand destruction from electric vehicles represents an existential threat. With EVs approaching cost parity with internal combustion engines and governments mandating phase-outs of gasoline vehicles, peak gasoline demand could arrive sooner than expected. California's regulatory environment—forcing Valero to shut Benicia after $1.1 billion in impairments—could be a preview of what's coming nationwide.

Environmental liabilities continue mounting. The $82 million Bay Area fine was just one example of escalating regulatory costs. As climate regulations tighten globally, compliance costs could overwhelm operating margins, particularly at older, less efficient facilities.

The renewable pivot, while strategically sound, depends heavily on government subsidies. The Inflation Reduction Act's credits make renewable diesel profitable, but these subsidies won't last forever. When they expire or diminish, Valero's renewable operations could quickly shift from profit centers to cash drains.

Finally, crude oil differentials continue to weigh on capture rates with no immediate relief expected from OPEC or Western Canadian Select through the first half of 2025, while the potential for reduced global GDP growth poses risks to refined product demand.

Competitive Position:

Against Marathon Petroleum (MPC), Valero maintains advantages in scale and geographic diversity but faces a peer with comparable operational excellence and financial strength. Phillips 66 (PSX) has successfully pivoted toward midstream and chemicals, reducing refining exposure while maintaining cash generation. Smaller players like PBF Energy and Delek US Holdings operate with higher cost structures and less financial flexibility, making them potential acquisition targets rather than threats.

The integrated oils—ExxonMobil and Chevron—possess structural advantages through vertical integration. When refining margins compress, their upstream operations provide natural hedges. However, their refining operations often underperform independents like Valero due to capital allocation priorities favoring exploration over refining optimization.

International competition, particularly from new mega-refineries in Asia and the Middle East, represents a growing threat. These facilities, often state-backed and built to modern specifications, can produce at lower costs while meeting stringent environmental standards. As global refining capacity exceeds demand growth, marginal facilities will be forced to close, potentially including some of Valero's older assets.

↑ Back to Top

XII. Epilogue & "If We Were CEOs"

The Greehey legacy extends far beyond financial metrics. From crisis-born spinoff to Fortune 10 giant, Valero's journey demonstrates that even in the most commoditized, capital-intensive industries, exceptional leadership and strategic vision can create enduring value. Bill Greehey didn't just build a refining company—he built an institution that transformed San Antonio into an energy hub and created thousands of millionaire employees through equity participation.

The spinoffs alone—NuStar Energy and CST Brands—created billions in additional shareholder value, proving that focused operations often outperform conglomerates. NuStar became a premier pipeline company, while CST Brands thrived as a standalone retailer before its eventual sale to Alimentation Couche-Tard. These transactions validated Greehey's philosophy: create value, then unlock it through strategic separation when markets offer premium valuations.

San Antonio's transformation mirrors Valero's rise. Once a military town with limited corporate presence, it's now home to multiple energy companies, attracted by the ecosystem Valero created. The company's philanthropy—over $500 million in community investments—built educational institutions, funded healthcare facilities, and supported veterans' programs, creating a virtuous cycle of talent attraction and retention.

If We Were CEOs:

Standing in Valero's San Antonio headquarters today, looking at crude prices, crack spreads, and regulatory pressures, what strategic moves would maximize long-term value?

First, we'd accelerate the portfolio high-grading already underway. The Benicia closure, while painful, was correct. Every refinery in the portfolio should be evaluated on a through-cycle IRR basis, considering not just current profitability but future regulatory costs and market dynamics. Facilities in hostile regulatory environments or structurally disadvantaged markets should be sold or closed, with capital redeployed to advantaged assets.

Second, we'd double down on the renewable diesel and SAF strategy, but with a twist. Rather than competing head-to-head with pure-play renewable companies for feedstock, we'd pursue vertical integration into waste collection and rendering. Controlling feedstock sources provides margin stability and competitive advantage as the renewable diesel market matures.

Third, we'd explore strategic partnerships with major oil producers looking to secure long-term refining capacity. As international oil companies retreat from downstream operations, national oil companies need reliable refining partners. Long-term processing agreements with Saudi Aramco, ADNOC, or Petrobras could provide stable margins while reducing commodity price exposure.

Fourth, we'd invest aggressively in refinery automation and AI-driven optimization. The difference between 95% and 97% utilization rates is worth hundreds of millions annually. Advanced process control, predictive maintenance, and automated crude selection could drive another 200 basis points of margin improvement.

Fifth, we'd prepare for the inevitable consolidation wave. As refining margins normalize at lower levels, subscale players will seek exits. Having a war chest ready—through conservative leverage and strong cash generation—would allow Valero to acquire assets at distressed prices, just as Greehey did throughout his tenure.

Key Questions for the Next Decade:

The fundamental question isn't whether gasoline demand will peak—it will. The question is the slope of the decline. A gradual 2% annual decrease allows for managed capacity reduction and sustained profitability. A sharp 5% annual drop would trigger industry-wide distress. Current projections suggest the former, but technology disruption could accelerate the transition.

Post-subsidy renewable economics remain uncertain. When the IRA credits expire or diminish, will renewable diesel compete with petroleum diesel on pure economics? Early indications suggest yes in certain markets, particularly where low-carbon fuel standards create permanent price premiums. But this assumes continued regulatory support, far from guaranteed in changing political climates.

The globalization versus regionalization debate will shape refining's future. If trade flows remain open, efficient producers like Valero can serve global markets. But rising protectionism, carbon border adjustments, and energy security concerns could fragment markets, benefiting locally advantaged producers while stranding export-oriented capacity.

Final Thoughts:

Valero's story challenges conventional wisdom about commodity businesses. Traditional finance theory suggests commoditized industries inevitably destroy value through cycles. Yet Valero has generated extraordinary returns—transforming a $1.6 billion legal liability into a $45 billion enterprise—by combining operational excellence, strategic timing, and disciplined capital allocation.

The lesson transcends energy: in mature, capital-intensive industries, the spoils flow to the most efficient operators with the patience to invest counter-cyclically and the discipline to return capital when opportunities diminish. Valero mastered this balance under Greehey's leadership. Whether current management can maintain this discipline while navigating the energy transition remains the critical question.

As we look toward 2030 and beyond, Valero faces a fundamental choice: maximize cash flows from a declining but still-profitable fossil fuel business, or invest aggressively in renewable alternatives with uncertain returns. The answer likely lies in threading the needle—maintaining refining excellence while building option value in renewables, ready to pivot as market signals clarify.

The next decade will determine whether Valero becomes the last refiner standing in a consolidating industry, or successfully transforms into a renewable energy powerhouse. Either path could create substantial value. The risk lies in being caught in between—neither fish nor fowl in a rapidly evolving energy landscape. If history is any guide, Valero will find a way to thrive. Crisis, after all, is where this company was born.