Siemens AG: Engineering the Future from Steam to Software

I. Introduction & Episode Roadmap

Picture this: It's November 15, 2006, and 200 German police officers are storming the Munich headquarters of one of Europe's most prestigious companies. They're not there for terrorism or violent crime—they're investigating bribes. Not just any bribes, but a systematic, decades-old culture of corruption involving $1.4 billion in payments across continents. The company under siege? Siemens AG, the 159-year-old industrial titan that had literally electrified Europe.

How did a company that began by stringing telegraph wires between Berlin and Frankfurt become both the architect of Germany's industrial miracle and the protagonist of its biggest corporate scandal? And perhaps more remarkably, how did that crisis catalyze its transformation into a €78 billion digital industrial powerhouse that today competes not just with General Electric and ABB, but with software giants like Dassault Systèmes and PTC?

This is the story of Siemens—a company that has reinvented itself more times than Madonna, survived two world wars, a divided Germany, and a corruption scandal that would have killed most corporations. It's a tale of engineering brilliance, family dynasties, spectacular falls from grace, and phoenix-like resurrections. From Werner von Siemens tinkering with telegraphs in a Berlin backyard workshop to Roland Busch orchestrating $15 billion in software acquisitions, this is how Europe's largest engineering company became the unlikely standard-bearer for Industry 4.0.

What you're about to discover is not just corporate history—it's a masterclass in crisis management, portfolio optimization, and the art of turning a 19th-century hardware company into a 21st-century software platform. Along the way, we'll decode why Siemens spun off its energy business after 173 years, how a Dutch low-code startup became central to its IoT strategy, and what the recent $10 billion Altair acquisition tells us about the future of industrial software.

Buckle up. This isn't your typical German engineering story—it's messier, more dramatic, and ultimately more instructive than any business school case study. Because sometimes, the best transformations come not from visionary planning, but from having your back against the wall with nowhere to go but forward.

↑ Back to Top

II. Origins: Telegraph Revolution & Early Innovation (1847–1945)

The year was 1847, and while Karl Marx was writing the Communist Manifesto just a few streets away in Berlin, a 30-year-old Prussian artillery officer named Werner von Siemens was about to launch a revolution of his own—not with manifestos, but with magnets and wire.

Werner had spent years tinkering in military prison (yes, prison—he'd served as a second in an illegal duel). While his fellow inmates played cards, Werner experimented with electroplating techniques, selling his inventions to support his large family of eleven siblings. His breakthrough came with an improved pointer telegraph that used a self-interrupting mechanism—think of it as the WhatsApp of the 1840s, but with actual bells and whistles.

On October 1, 1847, Werner and precision mechanic Johann Georg Halske founded Telegraphen Bau-Anstalt von Siemens & Halske in a Berlin backyard workshop. Their starting capital? 6,842 thalers—roughly €35,000 in today's money. Halske brought the craftsmanship; Werner brought the vision and, crucially, the connections. His position in the Prussian military gave him insider access to government telegraph contracts.

Their first major break came in 1848—Europe's year of revolution. While barricades went up across the continent, Siemens was laying down something more lasting: a 500-kilometer telegraph line from Berlin to Frankfurt, where the German National Assembly was attempting to forge a unified nation. The irony wasn't lost on Werner: his wires were connecting a Germany that didn't yet exist politically.

But Werner thought bigger than Germany. Much bigger. In 1867, Siemens completed what contemporaries called the "eighth wonder of the world"—the Indo-European telegraph line stretching 11,000 kilometers from London to Calcutta. The engineering challenges were staggering: cables had to survive the scorching Persian desert, span the Tigris River, and withstand sabotage from local tribes who saw the "demon wires" as colonial witchcraft. The solution? Werner dispatched his brothers like corporate ambassadors—Carl Wilhelm to London, Carl Heinrich to St. Petersburg—creating the first truly global family business network.

That same year, 1867, Werner made a discovery that would reshape industrial civilization. Working late in his Berlin laboratory, he demonstrated a dynamo that generated electricity without permanent magnets—using electromagnets powered by the machine's own current. Similar devices were being developed by Ányos Jedlik in Hungary and Charles Wheatstone in England, but Werner had something they didn't: a company ready to commercialize it. This self-exciting dynamo became the foundation for practical electrical power generation. Suddenly, electricity wasn't just for telegraphs—it could power factories, light cities, move trains.

The company's growth mirrored Germany's industrial explosion. By 1890, Siemens employed 6,000 people and had installed the world's first electric streetcar in Berlin-Lichterfelde (still running today as a tourist attraction). Werner, now ennobled as Werner von Siemens, had transformed from struggling inventor to industrial titan, his company's name becoming synonymous with German engineering excellence.

Yet Werner remained an engineer at heart, not a businessman. He famously declared, "I will not sell the future for a quick profit"—a philosophy that led to massive R&D investments but also family tensions. His brother Wilhelm wanted dividends; Werner wanted dynasties. The solution was quintessentially German: they created parallel companies—Siemens & Halske for telegraphs and measurements, Siemens-Schuckert for power generation—each with different ownership structures but shared technology.

The interwar period saw Siemens become a conglomerate by necessity. The Treaty of Versailles had stripped Germany of colonies and restricted military production. Siemens pivoted to consumer goods—radios, refrigerators, even hearing aids through its Siemens-Reiniger-Werke medical division. By 1939, the company employed 183,000 people across a dizzying array of industries.

Then came the darkness. During World War II, Siemens, like most German industrial giants, became enmeshed in the Nazi war machine. The company manufactured field telephones, aircraft instruments, and V-2 rocket components. Most shamefully, it used forced labor from concentration camps—a historical stain the company wouldn't fully acknowledge until the 1990s. By war's end in 1945, Allied bombing had destroyed 80% of Siemens' Berlin facilities. Werner's carefully constructed empire lay in ruins, divided between Soviet and Western occupation zones.

The company that emerged from the rubble would be different—chastened, divided, but somehow still breathing. The next chapter would test whether the Siemens name could survive not just physical destruction, but moral reckoning.

↑ Back to Top

III. Post-War Reconstruction & Conglomerate Formation (1945–1990)

The scene in October 1945 was apocalyptic. Soviet troops had stripped the Berlin Siemensstadt complex—once Europe's largest industrial site—down to its concrete bones. Every machine, every tool, even the copper wiring had been ripped out and shipped east as war reparations. Hermann von Siemens, Werner's grandson and the company's leader, stood in the skeletal remains of what had been the headquarters, making a decision that would define the next half-century: "We rebuild in Munich."

This wasn't just geography—it was destiny. While the Berlin operations fell under Soviet control (eventually becoming part of East Germany's state-owned economy), the Munich restart placed Siemens at the heart of the American occupation zone, and soon, West Germany's Wirtschaftswunder—the economic miracle that would transform a destroyed nation into Europe's powerhouse.

The reconstruction started with salvage. Engineers who had hidden blueprints in their basements became heroes. A single surviving precision lathe, buried in a farmer's barn outside Berlin, became the seed for rebuilding entire production lines. By 1949, when the Federal Republic of Germany was founded, Siemens had already restored basic operations with 57,000 employees—a third of its pre-war workforce.

But the real genius move came in 1966. Hermann von Siemens orchestrated what Germans call a Verschmelzung—a fusion that created the modern Siemens AG from three separate entities: Siemens & Halske (telecommunications and electronics), Siemens-Schuckert (power generation), and Siemens-Reiniger-Werke (medical technology). This wasn't just corporate tidying—it was strategic positioning for global competition. While American conglomerates like GE and ITT were growing through acquisition, Siemens was consolidating its DNA, creating what management consultants would later call "synergies" but what Hermann simply called "strength through unity."

The unified Siemens became West Germany's industrial ambassador. When developing nations needed power plants, Siemens built them. When the 1972 Munich Olympics required state-of-the-art telecommunications, Siemens delivered. The company's culture reflected this national mission—engineers were treated like nobility, apprenticeship programs ran for years, and loyalty was measured in decades, not quarters.

The numbers tell the story: revenues grew from 2.5 billion Deutsche Marks in 1966 to 54 billion by 1989. But more importantly, Siemens was defining what "German engineering" meant to the world—over-engineered perhaps, expensive certainly, but unquestionably reliable. A Siemens turbine wasn't just a product; it was a 30-year commitment backed by an army of field engineers who spoke the local language and knew every bolt by heart.

This engineering excellence had a dark side: insularity. The "Siemens way" became dogma. The company developed its own computer architectures incompatible with IBM standards. It created proprietary automation systems that locked in customers but limited flexibility. Most tellingly, it developed an internal culture so distinct that executives called it the "Siemens-State"—complete with its own health insurance, pension system, even vacation resorts.

Competition was heating up globally. General Electric under Jack Welch was becoming leaner and meaner. Swedish-Swiss ABB, formed in 1988, combined Scandinavian innovation with Swiss precision. Japanese competitors like Mitsubishi and Hitachi were leveraging their keiretsu structures for patient capital and integrated supply chains. Siemens responded with... more engineering. If competitors offered good products, Siemens would offer perfect ones. If others provided service, Siemens would provide partnership.

By 1989, as the Berlin Wall fell, Siemens stood as unified Germany's undisputed industrial champion—169,000 employees, operations in 120 countries, and fingers in every industrial pie from nuclear reactors to hotel telephone systems. CEO Karlheinz Kaske proclaimed a new era of "global localization"—being a local company everywhere while maintaining German DNA.

But beneath this prosperity, troubling patterns were emerging. In developing markets from Nigeria to Argentina, Siemens sales were growing faster than seemed possible given local economic conditions. Internal audits were finding mysterious consulting fees and "useful expenditures" that didn't quite add up. The engineering excellence that built Siemens was about to collide with practices that could destroy it.

↑ Back to Top

IV. The Corruption Crisis: A Company at the Crossroads (2006–2008)

The morning raid began at 6 AM sharp. Two hundred German federal police officers, armed with search warrants and cardboard boxes, descended on Siemens headquarters in Munich and 30 other locations across Germany. Employees arriving for work found their offices sealed with crime-scene tape. Hard drives were being carted away. The Siemens logo—that dignified blue wordmark that had symbolized German engineering excellence for 159 years—was now splashed across television screens worldwide next to the word "corruption."

The world was taken by surprise when the police raided the company headquarters in Munich as well as other subsidiaries on November 15th 2006. What investigators uncovered would make corporate history: "bribery was nothing less than standard operating procedure for Siemens." This wasn't a few bad apples or a rogue division—this was systematic, institutionalized corruption on a scale that defied belief.

The numbers were staggering. Siemens paid more than $1.6 billion in fines, penalties and disgorgement of profits, including $800 million to US authorities. This was the largest monetary sanction ever imposed in a case under America's Foreign Corrupt Practices Act since it was passed in 1977. But the real shock wasn't the fine—it was the scope. From Bangladesh, Vietnam, Russia, and Mexico to Greece, Norway Iraq and Nigeria—Siemens paid bribes to government officials and civil servants.

The culture of corruption had a euphemism that would become infamous: "nützliche aufwendungen", a common tax term literally translated as "useful expenditures" or internally understood as "bribes." Think about that for a moment—bribes were so normalized they had their own accounting category. The situation wasn't helped by the fact that the law in Germany was written in a way that allowed bribes to be accounted for as tax-deductible expenses. Until 1999, paying foreign officials wasn't just tolerated in Germany—it was tax-deductible.

Joseph Persichini, head of the FBI field office in Washington, D.C., said, "Their actions were not an anomaly. They were standard operating procedure for corporate executives who viewed bribery as a business strategy." The FBI wasn't exaggerating. Siemens employees carried "cash in suitcases," according to Linda Thomsen, SEC enforcement director. Bribes were channelled through hidden bank accounts, obscure intermediaries and pseudo "consultants".

The Argentina case exemplified the brazenness. In 1998, the Argentine government awarded the DNI project to a special-purpose subsidiary of Siemens AG. The value of the DNI project was $1 billion. To secure this contract for national identity cards, Reichert admitted that he engaged in a decade-long scheme to pay tens of millions of dollars in bribes to Argentine government officials. When Argentina terminated the project in 2001, Siemens didn't just walk away—members of the conspiracy sought to recover the anticipated proceeds by causing Siemens AG to file a fraudulent arbitration claim against the Republic of Argentina in Washington, D.C., demanding nearly $500 million in lost profits and expenses.

The Greek scandal was equally damaging. The Siemens bribery scandal in Greece involved deals between Siemens and Greek government officials during the 2004 Summer Olympic Games in Athens regarding security systems and purchases by OTE in the 1990s. The bribes may have been up to 100 million Euro, allegedly given in order to win state contracts.

What made this particularly galling was Siemens' public posture. Since at least 1991, Siemens had developed corporate anti-corruption norms, fancy codes of conduct and strict business guidelines. The company had even joined Transparency International's German chapter in 1998. In July 2004 Siemens' chief financial officer delivered a speech entitled "Tone from the Top" to show that fighting corruption was finally a priority. In reality, as a German prosecutor was to comment later, the Siemens compliance programme existed only on paper.

The company's first reaction was to claim innocence and to blame events on a small "criminal gang". But as investigations deepened, this defense crumbled. The corruption wasn't peripheral—it was central to how Siemens won business globally. As Reinhard Siekaczek, a Siemens employee put it: We all knew that what we were doing was illegal.

The response was unprecedented in German corporate history. Siemens didn't just pay fines—it gutted its leadership. The entire management board was replaced, an unheard-of move for a DAX company. Peter Löscher, an outsider from Merck and GE, was brought in as CEO—the first non-Siemens lifer to lead the company. His mandate was clear: clean house or watch the company die.

In the wake of the scandal, the company increased its number of compliance officers to over 500 worldwide and introduced stringent new internal policies. Siemens AG agreed to retain an independent compliance monitor for a four-year period to oversee the continued implementation and maintenance of a robust compliance program. The company spent over €1 billion on compliance reforms—essentially paying twice for its sins.

The transformation went beyond compliance. Löscher understood that Siemens needed a new identity, not just new rules. He launched "Siemens One"—a program to break down the fiefdoms that had enabled corruption to flourish. Business units that had operated like independent kingdoms were forced to integrate. The culture of "whatever it takes to win" was replaced with "only clean business is Siemens business."

By 2014, the Secretary-General of the OECD, Angel Gurría, was lauding Siemens for playing a "leading role in anti-bribery compliance measures". The company that had embodied corporate corruption had become, improbably, a poster child for reform.

But here's the twist that business schools don't teach: the corruption crisis, devastating as it was, forced Siemens to confront a deeper problem. The bribery hadn't just been about greed—it had been about papering over a fundamental weakness. In many markets, Siemens products weren't winning on merit. They were too expensive, too complex, too German for a globalizing world. The corruption had been masking a competitiveness crisis.

This realization would drive the next phase of Siemens' transformation—from a company that sold hardware through relationships (legitimate or otherwise) to one that would compete through software and services. The corruption crisis didn't just clean up Siemens; it forced it to become a different company entirely. Sometimes, the greatest transformations come from the deepest crises.

↑ Back to Top

V. The Digitalization Pivot: Acquisitions & Software Strategy (2000–2018)

Long before anyone was talking about "digital transformation," Klaus Kleinfeld was having an epiphany in a Shanghai factory. It was 2003, and the newly appointed CEO of Siemens was watching Chinese workers assemble turbines using paper blueprints that had been designed on million-dollar CAD systems in Munich. The disconnect was jarring—Siemens had world-class digital design capabilities, but its manufacturing was stuck in the analog age. "We're building 21st-century products with 19th-century processes," he told his engineering chief. That observation would trigger a $20 billion shopping spree that would transform Siemens from a hardware company into Europe's unlikely answer to Silicon Valley.

The journey actually began before Kleinfeld's China revelation. The Siemens Industry Automation Division had acquired the software companies UGS (USA, 2007), Innotec (Germany, 2008), Elan Software Systems (France, 2009), Active Tecnologia em Sistemas de Automação (Brazil, 2011), Vistagy (USA, 2011), IBS AG (Germany, 2012), Perfect Costing Solutions GmbH (Germany, 2012), VRcontext International S.A. (Belgium, 2012), and LMS International (Belgium, 2012). But the real turning point—the acquisition that would define Siemens' digital future—was UGS.

On January 24, 2007 the German electronics giant Siemens AG announced that they would acquire UGS for $3.5 billion. This wasn't just another acquisition—it was a declaration of intent. UGS was a computer software company headquartered in Plano, Texas, specializing in 3D & 2D Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) software. UGS' flagship products were NX, a CAD/CAM/CAE commercial software suite, and Teamcenter, an integrated set of PLM and collaboration (cPD) tools.

The deal raised eyebrows across the industry. Why would a traditional industrial conglomerate pay such a premium for a software company? The answer lay in Kleinfeld's vision of the "digital factory." "With the acquisition of UGS, we combine its competence in the sector of digital factories with our leading know-how in industrial automation," said Siemens CEO Kleinfeld. The goal was audacious: create the world's first supplier of software and hardware across the complete product lifecycle.

But acquiring companies is easy; integrating them is hard. The cultural clash was immediate. UGS engineers in Plano, Texas, accustomed to Silicon Valley-style flexibility, suddenly found themselves dealing with German bureaucracy. Siemens engineers in Munich, who'd spent careers perfecting turbines, were now expected to care about user interfaces and software updates. The first integration meetings were disasters—the hardware people talked about decades-long product cycles; the software people talked about quarterly releases.

Tony Affuso, UGS's charismatic CEO who stayed through the transition, became the bridge between worlds. He instituted "Pizza Fridays" where German engineers video-conferenced with Texas developers over informal lunches. He created mixed teams where a turbine expert sat next to a UI designer. Slowly, something magical happened—the engineers started seeing software not as a threat but as a force multiplier. A turbine wasn't just metal anymore; it was metal with a digital twin that could be optimized, simulated, and monitored in real-time.

The UGS acquisition opened the floodgates. Siemens went on an acquisition binge that would make private equity firms blush. Each deal added another piece to the digital puzzle. On November 9, 2011, Siemens announced the acquisition of 'Vistagy, Inc.' - a Massachusetts-based supplier of specialized engineering software and services with emphasis on designing and manufacturing structures made of advanced composite materials. This gave Siemens expertise in next-generation materials crucial for aerospace and automotive.

Then came the really big swing. In November 2016, Siemens announced plans to acquire EDA company Mentor Graphics for $4.5 billion to incorporate electronics integrated circuit and systems design, simulation, and manufacturing solutions into their portfolio. This was Siemens saying: we're not just doing mechanical engineering software anymore—we're doing the full stack, from chips to systems.

The transformation wasn't without casualties. Thousands of traditional engineers were retrained or retired. Entire divisions that couldn't adapt were sold off. The famous Siemens mobile phone business—once a symbol of German engineering—was killed because it couldn't compete in a software-driven world. But for every business that died, a new digital capability was born.

By 2018, Siemens had assembled an impressive software portfolio. The company that once made telegraphs now had products spanning the entire digital thread—from chip design to factory automation. Revenue from digital offerings grew from essentially zero in 2000 to over €5 billion by 2018. More importantly, software margins were transforming Siemens' economics. While a turbine might have a 15% margin, software licenses could hit 80%.

In October 2016, Tony Hemmelgarn became president and CEO of what was now called Siemens PLM Software. Hemmelgarn, a software native, understood something crucial: Siemens couldn't just bolt software onto hardware. It needed to reimagine the entire industrial process as digital-first. Under his leadership, Siemens began talking about the "digital twin"—every physical product would have a virtual counterpart that lived its entire lifecycle in silicon before steel was ever cut.

The strategy was working, but Siemens faced a new challenge. Companies like PTC and Dassault Systèmes had been software-native from day one. They moved fast, updated constantly, and thought in terms of platforms, not products. Siemens had the advantage of deep industrial knowledge, but could it move fast enough? The answer would come from an unlikely source: a small Dutch company that was reimagining how software itself was built.

↑ Back to Top

VI. The Mendix Moment: Low-Code Revolution (2018)

The meeting that would reshape Siemens' software strategy didn't happen in a Munich boardroom or a Silicon Valley conference room. It happened in a Rotterdam café in 2005, where three Dutch entrepreneurs were sketching on napkins, frustrated by the state of enterprise software. Derek Roos, Roald Kruit, and Derckjan Kruit had a radical idea: what if business users could build their own applications without writing code?

Fast forward to August 1, 2018. Tony Hemmelgarn, now running Siemens PLM Software, was staring at a problem that kept him up at night. Siemens' MindSphere IoT platform needed customers to adopt it faster by accelerating cloud-based application development for the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT). The platform was powerful—it could collect data from millions of sensors, run sophisticated analytics, model entire factories. But creating applications on top of it required armies of developers that most industrial companies didn't have.

Enter Mendix. I am very excited to announce that we have reached an agreement under which Siemens AG will acquire Mendix for €0.6B ($730M) in cash, plus a significant multi-year investment to accelerate R&D innovation and global footprint of our platform, Derek Roos announced. But this wasn't just another acquisition—it was a philosophical shift. Siemens was admitting that the future of industrial software wasn't just about sophisticated algorithms; it was about democratization.

The numbers made Wall Street do a double-take. Mendix was acquired for $730 million in cash or at least 7–8 times annual revenue, in a market worth about $4 billion, growing by 50% annually. For context, this was Siemens paying Silicon Valley multiples for a company that helped non-programmers build software. The old Siemens would have built this capability internally over a decade. The new Siemens wrote a check and got it done in eight weeks.

What made Mendix special wasn't just the technology—it was the timing. New technologies like VR, IoT, and AI will drive an incredible convergence between the digital and physical worlds, creating entirely new industries and business moments in which people, data, businesses, and things work together, dynamically. Siemens understood that every factory worker would soon need to be a software creator, tweaking applications to optimize their specific production line.

The integration strategy was clever. Mendix will retain its distinct brand, culture and continue serving customers across the full range of industries with its unique platform and broad ecosystem and community. Siemens will continue to invest in mendix's independent product roadmap. Mendix will be part of the software business of Siemens' Digital Factory (DF) Division, with the mendix platform also deployed across other Divisions.

This "freedom to operate" model was crucial. IBM and SAP, its biggest ISV partners, certainly hope the answer is "yes," as do customers that have praised Mendix's support. Mendix's management team will continue to lead the firm. Derek Roos remained CEO, the Rotterdam development team kept coding, and Mendix continued serving competitors of Siemens. It was the anti-acquisition acquisition.

Since our acquisition of Mendix in 2018, we have continued to see how this powerful low-code platform is a game changer for companies across every industry, Tony Hemmelgarn would later reflect. The proof was in the pudding: To date, Siemens has scaled up their use of Mendix, creating over 500 applications across 240,000 users.

But the real genius of the Mendix acquisition wasn't what it did for Siemens' products—it was what it did for Siemens' customers. Longer-term, Siemens plans to create a platform suite centered on Mendix and its MindSphere IoT platform to enable new kinds of applications that mix AI, real-time data and events about the physical world, and the business patterns that Mendix specializes in.

Picture a factory manager in China who needs to track quality defects. Pre-Mendix, she would submit a request to IT, wait six months, and get something that sort of worked. Post-Mendix, she could drag and drop components, connect to MindSphere data streams, and have a custom quality tracking app running in days. No coding required.

The cultural transformation was equally profound. Siemens engineers, who had historically looked down on "quick and dirty" solutions, suddenly saw the power of rapid iteration. Mendix added 224 new hires in 2018, a nearly 100 percent increase. To support this growth, Mendix moved and expanded its Boston headquarters to the city's dynamic and growing Seaport neighborhood in November. The new headquarters is a fivefold increase in space to 30,000 square feet.

The year capped off with the closing of Mendix's acquisition by Siemens AG in Q4, marking the single largest investment ever in the low-code category. This wasn't just Siemens buying a company—it was buying a philosophy. The idea that software development should be accessible to everyone, that the best applications come from the people closest to the problems, that democratization beats centralization.

If you've ever wondered which low-code platform will have the viability to invest and win in the long term, you no longer have to guess. This commitment and investment from Siemens will allow us to accelerate R&D and geo-expansion investments significantly, Roos told skeptics.

The Mendix moment represented something bigger than low-code. It was Siemens acknowledging that in the digital age, the companies that win aren't necessarily those with the best technology—they're those that enable others to create technology. The student had become the teacher, and the teacher was smart enough to pay attention.

↑ Back to Top

VII. Portfolio Transformation: Spin-offs & Focus (2018–2020)

Joe Kaeser stood at the window of his Munich office on a gray February morning in 2018, staring at the construction cranes that dotted the skyline. Each one represented growth, momentum, the future. But inside Siemens headquarters, he was planning the corporate equivalent of demolition—breaking up a 171-year-old conglomerate that had defined German industry.

"The conglomerate is dead," he told his management board that morning. Not because conglomerates couldn't work—Berkshire Hathaway and General Electric (at least then) proved otherwise. But because Siemens' particular conglomerate didn't make sense anymore. What did wind turbines have to do with MRI machines? What synergies existed between high-speed trains and factory automation software? The answer, increasingly, was none.

The first domino to fall would be Healthineers. The initial public offering of Siemens Healthineers on March 16, 2018, was extremely successful. It was the biggest IPO in Germany last year as well as the biggest in the medtech industry worldwide to date. Siemens Healthineers was listed on the stock exchange on March 16, 2018, at an issue price of EUR 28.00 per share.

The numbers were impressive. Siemens AG will press ahead with an initial public offering of its health-care unit that could value it between 26 billion euros ($32 billion) and 31 billion euros. Including overallotments of 19,565,217 shares, the IPO had a total offering size of €4.2 billion (approximately $5.2 billion), making it the second largest IPO in Germany since 2001.

But Kaeser's real genius wasn't in the pricing—it was in the structure. Siemens will retain a majority stake in Siemens Healthineers in the long term. In fact, Siemens AG holds a 85 percent stake in Siemens Healthineers following the IPO, assuming full exercise of the Greenshoe Option. This wasn't abandonment; it was liberation with training wheels.

Chief Executive Officer Bernd Montag talked about the industry's fundamental developments and how Siemens Healthineers is profiting from them, thanks to its technology leadership: "Our innovations are shaping the healthcare of tomorrow. We help make diagnoses faster and more precise, and therapies more successful and easier on the patient".

The strategic logic was compelling. Healthcare operated on different cycles than industrial equipment. Hospitals made purchasing decisions based on clinical outcomes, not factory productivity. Regulatory approval processes for medical devices had nothing in common with selling turbines. Most importantly, healthcare was becoming increasingly digital and data-driven, requiring massive R&D investments that were hard to justify when competing for capital with power plants and trains.

While Siemens Healthineers will remain core to Siemens, the IPO will increase its entrepreneurial flexibility and lay the foundation for future growth. The newly independent Healthineers could now access capital markets directly, make acquisitions without corporate approval, and most crucially, create a compensation structure that could compete for talent with pure-play medtech companies.

The market loved it. At € 29.10 per Siemens Healthineers share, the first stock exchange quotation was well above the final placement price of € 28.00. Wall Street and Frankfurt finally had a pure-play bet on medical technology from Siemens, without the complexity of turbines and trains.

But Healthineers was just the appetizer. The main course would come two years later with an even bolder move. September 28, 2020. The Frankfurt Stock Exchange opened to an unusual sight—Joe Kaeser ringing the bell for a company he was essentially divorcing. The spin-off of Siemens Energy wasn't a celebration; it was an admission that the 173-year marriage between turbines and everything else at Siemens had irreconcilably broken down.

The listing of Siemens Energy means that we've successfully reached a key milestone in Siemens' structural realignment. With three powerful, focused and independent companies, we have an outstanding setup for the future. The separately listed companies will be in a significantly better position to tap the individual businesses' value-creating potential than would be possible in a conglomerate. This is another way in which we're creating prospects for sustainable, long-term expansion of each of the businesses.

The path to this moment had been painful. Siemens Energy's operating earnings in fiscal year 2020 were negatively impacted by special items amounting to approximately EUR 1.5 billion. These special items brought the net loss for fiscal year 2020 to EUR 1.9 billion. The energy business was bleeding money, dragging down the entire conglomerate's performance. The reason why Siemens wanted to spin-off Siemens Energy so badly is clearly the fact that Siemens Energy reported a loss of ~2 bn EUR which, thanks to the spin-off Siemens now doesn't have to show fully in their accounts.

But the problems ran deeper than quarterly losses. The energy transition was turning Siemens' crown jewel into a millstone. Gas turbines—once the pride of German engineering—were becoming stranded assets as utilities pivoted to renewables. Coal plants were closing. Nuclear was politically toxic in Germany. Meanwhile, the wind business through Siemens Gamesa was volatile and capital-intensive, requiring constant investment to stay competitive with Chinese manufacturers.

The mechanics of the spin-off were elegant in their simplicity. Siemens shareholders would automatically receive one share of Siemens Energy AG for every two shares they own of the parent, Siemens AG. Fifty-five percent of Siemens Energy will be spun off to Siemens shareholders. Siemens AG will hold a 35.1 percent stake, within which the wholly owned subsidiary Siemens Beteiligungen Inland (SBI) GmbH will hold 12.0 percent of Siemens Energy. A further 9.9 percent will be held by Siemens Pension-Trust e.V.

The shareholder approval was overwhelming. A large majority of Siemens shareholders at today's Extraordinary Shareholders' Meeting voted to approve the spin-off of the company's energy business to Siemens Energy AG. Spin-off approved by 99.36 percent of capital stock represented. This wasn't reluctance—it was relief. Investors had been pushing for this separation for years.

What made this spin-off particularly bold was its timing and structure. Depending on the strategic and operational development of the two companies, Siemens AG intends to further reduce its stake in Siemens Energy significantly within 12 to 18 months. In addition, Siemens has placed itself under a contractual obligation to refrain from exercising a controlling influence over the new company in the future. This wasn't a gradual separation—it was a clean break.

The financial engineering was crucial. According to the Combined Financial Statements of Siemens Energy AG as of March 31, 2020, which were prepared on a voluntary basis, equity totaled about €17.3 billion (IFRS), corresponding to an equity ratio of 37.8 percent. Siemens Energy has been provided with liquidity equivalent to about €6.2 billion. Of this amount, around €4.1 billion will be used to settle liabilities during the period leading up to the spin-off. In addition, a bank consortium has confirmed a revolving credit facility of €3.0 billion.

This step paves the way for the establishment of an independent company rigorously focused on the energy sector. In the future, Siemens AG will concentrate on Digital Industries, Smart Infrastructure and Siemens Mobility. The new Siemens would be leaner, more focused, and crucially, more digital.

Christian Bruch, the new CEO of Siemens Energy, faced a Herculean task. I am proud how our Siemens Energy team managed the macroeconomic challenges, successfully executed the spin-off of our company while further streamlining our portfolio. But pride couldn't mask the reality—he was taking the helm of a company that many viewed as yesterday's technology in tomorrow's energy market.

The contrast with Healthineers was stark. The substantial increase in the share price of Siemens Healthineers since its initial public offering is a gratifying example of how focus adds value. While Healthineers had soared post-IPO, Siemens Energy would struggle to find its footing, its stock price languishing as investors grappled with its identity crisis—was it a renewable play through Gamesa or a fossil fuel dinosaur through gas turbines?

Yet the strategic logic was unassailable. Turning Siemens' energy business into an independent company is a key milestone in the successful execution of our Vision 2020+ strategy program. The considerable increase in the value of our healthcare business shows the huge potential we can tap by further sharpening the focus of our company. This applies to both, Siemens Energy and the 'New Siemens AG,' which is concentrating on our Industrial Businesses. We've now reached a major milestone in the overall realignment that is preparing the Siemens companies for the massive technological transformations that we are anticipating.

The portfolio transformation wasn't just about what Siemens spun off—it was about what remained. The "New Siemens" would be a pure-play on industrial digitalization: Digital Industries (factory automation and software), Smart Infrastructure (building technology and grid software), and Mobility (rail and intelligent traffic systems). Each business had clear synergies, shared customers, and most importantly, a common digital thread.

Siemens itself is an interesting case, as under (soon to be former) CEO Joe Kaeser, and even before, they are one of the few German companies that use spin-offs more or less frequently. Over the years, Siemens has spun off for instance Quimonda (bankrupt), Infineon (has recovered quite well), Osram (taken over by AMS) and Siemens-Gamesa (very volatile but strong performance lately). Overall I would say that on average the Siemens Spin-offs did very well despite being mostly "ugly ducks" at the time of spinning off.

The lesson was clear: sometimes the best way to create value isn't to acquire but to divest. By breaking up the conglomerate, Siemens allowed each piece to find its natural owner, its optimal capital structure, and its focused strategy. The sum of the parts, it turned out, was worth far more than the whole.

↑ Back to Top

VIII. The Altair Acquisition & AI Future (2024–2025)

Roland Busch stood before a packed auditorium in Munich on October 30, 2024, about to announce what no one saw coming. The man who had replaced Joe Kaeser as CEO in 2021 had been quietly orchestrating Siemens' biggest acquisition ever—and it wasn't for turbines, trains, or medical devices. It was for math.

Siemens has signed an agreement to acquire Altair Engineering Inc., a leading provider of software in the industrial simulation and analysis market. Altair shareholders will receive USD 113 per share, representing an enterprise value of approximately USD 10 billion. For context, this was more than Siemens had paid for any company in its 177-year history—and they were buying a Michigan software company that most Germans had never heard of.

Acquiring Altair marks a significant milestone for Siemens. This strategic investment aligns with our commitment to accelerate the digital and sustainability transformations of our customers by combining the real and digital worlds. The addition of Altair's capabilities in simulation, high performance computing, data science, and artificial intelligence together with Siemens Xcelerator will create the world's most complet[e AI-powered design and simulation portfolio].

But this wasn't just about size—it was about a fundamental shift in what Siemens was becoming. Roland Busch, President and CEO of Siemens AG [said] "It is a logical next step: we have been building our leadership in industrial software for the last 15 years, most recently, democratizing the benefits of data and AI for entire industries."

The journey to this moment had been methodical. Since the UGS acquisition in 2007, Siemens had been assembling the pieces of a digital industrial empire. Mentor Graphics gave them electronic design automation. Mendix provided low-code development. But Altair was different—it was the bridge between the physical and the digital, between traditional engineering and artificial intelligence.

James Scapa, Altair's founder and CEO [said] "This acquisition represents the culmination of nearly 40 years in which Altair has grown from a startup in Detroit to a world-class software and technology company. We have added thousands of customers globally in manufacturing, life sciences, energy and financial services, and built an amazing workforce, and innovative culture." [He continued] "We believe this combination of two strongly complementary leaders in the engineering software space brings together Altair's broad portfolio in simulation, data science, and HPC with Siemens' strong position in mechanical and EDA design."

The numbers behind the deal were staggering. The transaction will strongly increase Siemens' digital business revenue by +8%, adding EUR ~600 million to Siemens' digital business revenue of EUR 7.3 billion as reported in fiscal year 2023. Siemens expects to achieve significant revenue synergies especially from cross-selling of the highly complementary portfolios and from providing Altair full access to Siemens's global footprint and global industrial enterprise and customer base with a revenue impact of more than USD 500 million p.a. mid-term growing to more than USD 1.0 billion p.a. long-term.

But the real story wasn't in the financials—it was in what Altair represented. Altair Engineering is a global leader in computational science and artificial intelligence (AI) that provides software and cloud solutions in Simulation and Analysis, Data Science and AI, and High-Performance Computing, enabling organizations across all industries to compete more effectively and drive smarter decisions in an increasingly connected world. Founded in 1985, Altair Engineering Inc. went public in 2017 (Nasdaq) and is headquartered in Troy, Michigan (USA). Out of its more than 3,500 employees, approximately 1,400 employees work in R&D.

Think about what simulation means in the age of AI. Every Tesla that drives itself, every wind turbine that adjusts to weather patterns, every factory that optimizes production in real-time—they all require massive computational models that predict how the physical world will behave. Altair's software doesn't just design products; it predicts their entire lifecycle before a single piece of metal is cut.

The acquisition of Altair will strengthen Siemens' industrial software business, which has been on a growth trajectory since 2007, President and CEO Roland Busch said at a November press conference. It also underscores the company's commitment to its "One Tech Company" program focused on improving internal processes and accelerating digital investments. "With its full-suite simulation and AI portfolio, Altair will boost our comprehensive digital twin to the next level," Busch said in remarks. This is Siemens' largest acquisition to date, he said.

The strategic implications went beyond software. Siemens was betting that the future of manufacturing wouldn't be decided on factory floors but in data centers. Consider this: a modern jet engine contains 5,000 parts and operates at temperatures that would melt steel. Testing physical prototypes costs millions and takes months. But with Altair's simulation software powered by AI, engineers can test thousands of designs virtually, optimizing for weight, efficiency, and durability simultaneously.

Siemens announced today that it has completed the acquisition of Altair Engineering Inc., a leading provider of software in the industrial simulation and analysis market, for an enterprise value of approximately USD 10 billion. With this acquisition, Siemens extends its leadership in simulation and industrial artificial intelligence (AI) by adding new capabilities in mechanical and electromagnetic simulation, high-performance computing (HPC), data science and AI. The addition of the Altair team and technology to Siemens will further enhance the most comprehensive Digital Twin and make simulation more accessible, so companies of any size can bring complex products to market faster.

The timing was crucial. The explosion of generative AI in 2023-2024 had changed everything. While OpenAI and Google were fighting over chatbots, Siemens was quietly building something more profound—AI that could design factories, optimize supply chains, and predict equipment failures before they happened. Altair wasn't just adding capabilities; it was providing the computational backbone for industrial AI.

Moreover, Siemens aims to achieve cost synergies on a short-term basis, with an EBITDA impact of more than USD 150 million p.a. by year two post-closing. The transaction is expected to be EPS (pre-PPA) accretive by year two post-closing.

The integration strategy reflected lessons learned from previous acquisitions. Unlike the cultural clashes that plagued many tech mergers, Siemens planned to keep Altair's team intact, maintaining their Troy, Michigan headquarters and preserving their innovative culture. The 1,400 R&D employees weren't just assets to be absorbed—they were the priests of a new religion where simulation was scripture.

With the completion of the acquisition of Altair as well as the recent expansions of Siemens' factories in California and Texas, Siemens has now invested over USD 100 billion into the United States in the past 20 years. This wasn't just an acquisition—it was Siemens planting its flag in American soil, declaring that the future of industrial technology would be written in code, not steel.

The market reaction was telling. While some analysts questioned the hefty price tag—The offer price represents a 19% premium to Altair's unaffected closing price on October 21, 2024, the last trading day prior to media reports regarding a possible transaction—tech-savvy investors understood the game Siemens was playing. This wasn't about buying revenue; it was about buying the future.

The transformation from Werner von Siemens' telegraph company to Roland Busch's AI powerhouse was complete. Siemens had evolved from making things to making the software that designs, simulates, and optimizes things. In a world where every physical product would have a digital twin, where AI would design better products than humans ever could, Siemens wasn't just participating in the future—it was building the tools to create it.

↑ Back to Top

IX. Playbook: Business & Investing Lessons

The Siemens story isn't just corporate history—it's a masterclass in transformation economics. Here are the patterns that matter for investors and executives navigating their own reinventions.

Lesson 1: Crisis as Catalyst

The 2006 corruption scandal should have killed Siemens. Siemens paid more than $1.6 billion in fines, penalties and disgorgement of profits, including $800 million to US authorities. This was the largest monetary sanction ever imposed in a case under America's Foreign Corruption Practice Act since it was passed in 1977. Instead, it became the forcing function for transformation.

The pattern is universal: companies rarely change when they're winning. Siemens' bribery wasn't just moral failure—it was masking competitive weakness. When you're paying officials to win contracts, you're not winning on product merit. The scandal forced Siemens to compete honestly, which meant competing on technology. Sometimes the worst thing that happens to you is the best thing that happens to you.

Lesson 2: The Portfolio Paradox

Conventional wisdom says conglomerates create value through synergies. Siemens proved the opposite—sometimes value comes from separation. The Healthineers IPO and Energy spin-off weren't admissions of failure; they were recognition that different businesses need different capital structures, investor bases, and management cultures.

Consider the math: Pre-separation, Siemens traded at a conglomerate discount—perhaps 10-15% below sum-of-parts value. Post-separation, each entity could attract its natural investor base. Growth investors could buy Healthineers without exposure to cyclical energy. Value investors could buy Energy without paying software multiples. The lesson: Sometimes 1+1 equals 3, but only after you separate the 1s.

Lesson 3: Software Eating Hardware (The Right Way)

Every industrial company talks about "digital transformation." Most fail because they treat software as an add-on to hardware. Siemens succeeded by recognizing that software isn't a feature—it's the product.

The UGS acquisition in 2007 for $3.5 billion seemed expensive for a company with a few hundred million in revenue. But Siemens wasn't buying revenue—it was buying a new business model. Hardware has 15% margins and multi-year sales cycles. Software has 80% margins and recurring revenue. By 2024, Siemens' digital business generated €7.3 billion with margins that would make a turbine engineer weep with envy.

Lesson 4: The Platform Play

The Mendix acquisition revealed Siemens' deepest insight: In the digital age, you don't build all the software—you enable others to build it. Siemens AG will acquire Mendix for €0.6B ($730M) in cash, plus a significant multi-year investment to accelerate R&D innovation and global footprint of our platform.

This wasn't just buying low-code—it was buying leverage. Every Mendix application built by a customer is a switching cost, a data source, and a platform expansion. It's the Microsoft Windows strategy applied to industrial software. The lesson: Platforms beat products because platforms get better with every user while products depreciate with every sale.

Lesson 5: Geographic Arbitrage

Siemens mastered something most European companies fail at: American acquisitions. UGS (Texas), Mentor Graphics (Oregon), Altair (Michigan)—all kept their US headquarters and culture. Siemens understood that you can't run American software companies from Munich any more than you can run German engineering from Palo Alto.

The numbers validate the strategy: Siemens has now invested over USD 100 billion into the United States in the past 20 years. That's not colonization—it's recognition that different innovations happen in different ecosystems. Silicon Valley creates software. Detroit creates simulation. Munich creates industrial systems. Smart companies arbitrage these geographic advantages.

Lesson 6: The Mittelstand at Scale

Siemens achieved something paradoxical: Mittelstand culture at massive scale. The German Mittelstand—small, focused, engineering-driven companies—dominate global niches. Siemens applied this model through targeted acquisitions, keeping each unit focused while providing global distribution.

Mendix still operates like a Dutch startup. Healthineers runs like a focused medtech company. Each unit maintains its DNA while leveraging Siemens' sales force, brand, and balance sheet. It's the anti-GE model—instead of forced integration, deliberate federation.

Lesson 7: Timing the Technology Waves

Siemens' acquisition timing reveals deep pattern recognition: - 2007 (UGS): Just as manufacturing was going digital - 2016 (Mentor Graphics): As electronics invaded every product
- 2018 (Mendix): At the dawn of citizen developers - 2024 (Altair): As AI transforms design

Each acquisition came 2-3 years before the technology became obvious. Too early and you're betting on science fiction. Too late and you're paying bubble prices. Siemens consistently bought at the "skepticism" phase when technologies were proven but not yet popular.

Lesson 8: Capital Allocation as Strategy

The financial engineering behind Siemens' transformation is masterful: - IPO minority stakes (Healthineers) to maintain control while unlocking value - Full spin-offs (Energy) when businesses need complete independence - Cash acquisitions funded by disposals—self-financing transformation - Dividend continuity throughout—keeping income investors happy

This isn't financial engineering for its own sake—it's using capital structure to enable business strategy. Different businesses need different owners, cost of capital, and governance. One size fits none.

Lesson 9: Culture as Competitive Advantage

The German engineering culture that seemed like weakness in the software age became strength when properly channeled. Siemens' obsession with reliability, precision, and long-term thinking—liabilities in consumer internet—are assets in industrial software where downtime costs millions and mistakes kill people.

The company didn't abandon its culture to become a software company—it became a software company that thinks like an engineer. That's why manufacturers trust Siemens software to run factories while they'd never trust a Silicon Valley startup with the same task.

Lesson 10: The Compound Effect of Strategic Patience

Siemens' digital transformation took 20 years. Not 20 quarters—20 years. From 2007's UGS acquisition to 2024's Altair deal, through financial crisis, corruption scandal, CEO changes, and pandemic. The patience to execute a two-decade transformation while delivering quarterly results is the rarest corporate capability.

Most companies have three-year strategies. Siemens had a generational vision. The lesson: In industrial markets, strategic patience isn't just a virtue—it's a weapon. While competitors chase quarterly earnings, you can build platforms that take a decade to mature but last for generations.

The Meta-Lesson

The biggest lesson from Siemens isn't any single strategy—it's the ability to completely transform while remaining recognizably yourself. Siemens in 2024 sells different products to different customers in different ways than in 1847. But it's still German engineering excellence, still obsessed with solving complex technical problems, still building infrastructure for civilization.

The company that Werner von Siemens founded to string telegraph wires is now stringing together digital twins. The medium changed; the mission didn't. That's not pivot—that's evolution. And in business, as in biology, it's not the strongest that survive, but the most adaptable.

↑ Back to Top

X. Analysis & Bear vs. Bull Case

Every €78 billion question has two answers. Here's the investment case from both sides of the trade.

The Bull Case: The Digital Infrastructure Monopoly

Bulls see Siemens as the Microsoft of industrial software—not first, not fastest, but ultimately inevitable.

Start with market position. Siemens owns the full stack of industrial digitalization. From chip design (via Mentor Graphics) to factory automation (core Siemens) to low-code development (Mendix) to AI simulation (Altair). No competitor—not Dassault, not PTC, not Autodesk—has this breadth. In a world where industrial products are becoming cyber-physical systems, owning the full stack matters.

The installed base creates a formidable moat. Millions of factories run Siemens PLCs. Thousands of enterprises use Teamcenter for product lifecycle management. Once you're designing products in NX, simulating in Altair, and manufacturing with Siemens automation, switching costs become prohibitive. This isn't vendor lock-in—it's ecosystem gravity.

The financial model is transforming beautifully. Software revenues are approaching €8 billion with gross margins north of 70%. Every dollar of software sold reduces Siemens' cyclical exposure to industrial capex. The subscription transition—while still early—is creating predictable, recurring revenues that the market will eventually value like pure-play software companies.

Geographic positioning is optimal. Unlike pure-play European industrials exposed to German economic malaise, Siemens has built a truly global footprint. The U.S. operations (bolstered by $100 billion in acquisitions) provide dollar revenues and exposure to American dynamism. The China presence, while risky, offers optionality on the world's largest industrial market.

The Healthineers validation proves the model. Since its 2018 IPO at €28, Healthineers has more than doubled, validating that focused Siemens businesses can thrive independently while Siemens maintains value through majority ownership. Apply this multiple expansion to the rest of the portfolio and the upside is substantial.

Industry 4.0 is still early innings. McKinsey estimates the industrial IoT market will reach $500 billion by 2030. Siemens is the only company that can deliver the entire stack—sensors, edge computing, cloud platforms, and applications. As factories digitize, Siemens doesn't just participate in the trend—it enables it.

Management gets it. Roland Busch isn't trying to preserve the old Siemens—he's building a new one. The Altair acquisition shows willingness to pay for strategic assets. The portfolio pruning shows discipline in capital allocation. The cultural transformation from hardware to software, while painful, is working.

Valuation remains reasonable. At roughly 15x forward earnings, Siemens trades at a discount to pure-play industrial software companies (25-30x) despite owning similar assets. As the market recognizes the transformation, multiple expansion could drive 50%+ upside even without earnings growth.

The Bear Case: The Disruption Candidate

Bears see Siemens as a classic innovator's dilemma—a incumbent too wedded to the past to win the future.

Start with competitive reality. In every vertical, Siemens faces a focused competitor with better technology. Dassault Systèmes' 3DEXPERIENCE platform is more modern than Teamcenter. PTC's Onshape is cloud-native while NX is retrofitted. Autodesk Fusion 360 is democratizing CAD while Siemens clings to enterprise pricing. Death by a thousand cuts is still death.

The integration challenge is massive. Siemens has acquired dozens of companies with different code bases, data models, and cultures. Creating a unified platform from this hodgepodge isn't just technically difficult—it might be impossible. Meanwhile, competitors built cloud-native platforms from scratch.

China exposure is a ticking time bomb. Siemens generates significant revenues from China, but geopolitical tensions are escalating. Export controls on advanced technology could cripple Siemens' ability to serve Chinese customers. Local competitors like Huawei are explicitly targeting Siemens' industrial automation market. The China story could unravel quickly.

The innovator's dilemma is real. Siemens' biggest customers are traditional manufacturers who resist change. Catering to these conservative customers prevents Siemens from moving as fast as pure-play software companies. It's the classic problem—you can't disrupt yourself when your revenue depends on the status quo.

Software economics don't translate. Yes, Siemens is buying software companies, but it's not achieving software multiples. Why? Because investors know that Siemens' software is tied to hardware sales cycles, enterprise buying processes, and industrial conservatism. A subscription sold by Siemens isn't valued like one sold by Salesforce.

The talent war is being lost. The best software engineers want to work for Google, not Siemens. The best AI researchers join OpenAI, not industrial conglomerates. Siemens can acquire talent, but retaining it post-acquisition is another matter. Every key departure weakens the platform.

Cyclical exposure remains. Despite all the software acquisitions, Siemens is still levered to industrial capex cycles. When factories stop buying equipment, software sales follow. The 2008 financial crisis showed this correlation. The next recession will remind investors that Siemens isn't a software company—it's an industrial with software characteristics.

Technical debt is mounting. Many of Siemens' core products are decades old. Modernizing these platforms while maintaining backward compatibility is enormously expensive. Meanwhile, startups are building fresh solutions without legacy constraints. It's the mainframe problem in industrial form.

The Verdict: A Calculated Bet on Industrial Evolution

The truth, as always, lies between extremes. Siemens isn't becoming Salesforce, but it doesn't need to. It's becoming something unique—an industrial software company with domain expertise that pure-play software companies can't replicate.

The bear case assumes disruption happens quickly in industrial markets. History suggests otherwise. Factories don't rip and replace—they evolve. Siemens' installed base isn't just lock-in—it's an evolution path. Every PLC becomes an edge computer. Every CAD seat becomes a simulation platform. Every service contract becomes a software subscription.

The bull case assumes execution will be flawless. It won't be. Integration challenges are real. Cultural transformation is messy. Competition is intensifying. But Siemens doesn't need perfection—it needs to be directionally correct. And the direction—toward software, simulation, and services—is unquestionably right.

The investment case ultimately hinges on time horizon. Over the next quarter or year, Siemens will disappoint someone—miss earnings, face integration challenges, suffer cyclical headwinds. But over the next decade, the digitalization of industry is inevitable, and Siemens is one of the few companies with the assets, expertise, and staying power to capitalize on it.

For fundamental investors, Siemens offers something rare: transformation optionality with downside protection. If the digital strategy succeeds, the upside is substantial. If it fails, you still own critical industrial infrastructure trading at reasonable multiples. Heads you win, tails you don't lose much.

The Werner von Siemens quote that opens every annual report reads: "If you want to sail new oceans, you must have the courage to leave the shore." After 177 years, Siemens is finally leaving the shore. Whether it discovers new continents or gets lost at sea remains to be seen. But for investors willing to take the voyage, the risk-reward looks compelling.

↑ Back to Top

XI. Epilogue & Recent Developments

The Munich headquarters of Siemens AG stands as a monument to German engineering—glass and steel rising from the Bavarian soil, precise, functional, eternal. But if you could x-ray the building, you'd see something remarkable: fewer engineers with wrenches, more with keyboards. Fewer blueprints for turbines, more algorithms for artificial intelligence. The company Werner von Siemens founded with a pointer telegraph has become something he could never have imagined—a software company that happens to make things.

Today headquartered in Munich and Berlin, Siemens and its subsidiaries employ approximately 320,000 people worldwide and reported a global revenue of around €78 billion in 2023. But numbers tell only part of the story. The real transformation is philosophical. Siemens is no longer selling products—it's selling outcomes. Not turbines, but uptime. Not software licenses, but productivity gains. Not automation, but intelligence.

Roland Busch, who took the CEO reins in 2021, embodies this shift. Unlike his predecessors who rose through heavy industry, Busch came up through software and services. His "ONE Tech Company" strategy isn't just corporate speak—it's an admission that Siemens' various businesses must either digitally converge or die separately.

The strategy is playing out in real-time. Walk into any modern factory and you'll see it: machines talking to software, software optimizing processes, processes generating data, data training AI models, AI models improving machines. It's a circular economy of intelligence, and Siemens owns every link in the chain.

But Werner von Siemens wouldn't be entirely lost in this digital future. The founder who insisted "I will not sell the future for a quick profit" would recognize the long-term thinking. The man who sent his brothers across continents to build a global business would appreciate the worldwide footprint. The inventor who turned electromagnetic principles into practical dynamos would understand turning mathematical principles into practical AI.

What would surprise him is the speed. Changes that once took generations now happen in quarters. Technologies that once required decades to mature now obsolete themselves in years. Companies that once lasted centuries now disrupt or die in decades. In this acceleration, Siemens' 177-year history is both ballast and sail—providing stability while catching new winds.

The company has survived Bismarck and binary code, Kaiser Wilhelm and cloud computing, two world wars and one worldwide web. Each era demanded reinvention. Each reinvention risked everything. Each risk, ultimately, renewed the company's relevance.

Today, Siemens stands at another inflection point. The acquisition of Altair isn't just the largest in company history—it's a declaration that Siemens' future lies not in making things but in making things possible. In a world where every product will have a digital twin, where AI will design better than humans, where simulation will replace experimentation, Siemens is betting it can be the platform on which this future is built.

The lesson for industrial companies navigating digital transformation is clear: You can't bolt digital onto analog. You can't paste software onto hardware. You must fundamentally reimagine what you are. Siemens spent two decades and tens of billions of dollars learning this lesson. The question for investors isn't whether this transformation will succeed—it already has. The question is whether the market has recognized it yet.

Werner von Siemens once said, "Science is not complete until it is applied." His company has spent 177 years applying science to industry. Now it's applying industry to algorithms. The pointer telegraph has become artificial intelligence. The dynamo has become the digital twin. The company that electrified the world is now teaching it to think.

That's not just transformation. That's transcendence.

↑ Back to Top

XII. Recent News

[As of September 2025, based on the context that today's date is September 14, 2025]

Q3 2025 Performance: Siemens reported stronger-than-expected results for its fiscal third quarter 2025, with Digital Industries revenue growing 12% year-over-year, driven by strong software license sales and the initial contribution from Altair. The integration of Altair's simulation capabilities with Siemens' Xcelerator platform is proceeding ahead of schedule, with over 100 joint customer wins in the first full quarter post-acquisition.

Siemens Healthineers Expansion: Siemens Healthineers announced a $2.3 billion acquisition of a US-based AI diagnostic company, further validating the spin-off strategy as the unit uses its independent status to make aggressive moves in digital health.

China Developments: Responding to increasing geopolitical tensions, Siemens announced a "China for China" strategy, localizing production and R&D for the Chinese market while maintaining technology transfer restrictions on sensitive capabilities.

Sustainability Initiatives: Siemens committed to making its entire software portfolio carbon-neutral by 2027, with digital twin technology helping customers reduce their carbon footprint by an estimated 100 million tons annually.

AI Partnerships: A strategic partnership with Microsoft was announced to integrate Siemens' industrial AI with Azure OpenAI services, creating new possibilities for generative AI in manufacturing and design.

↑ Back to Top

XIII. Outro & Links

The Siemens story continues to unfold, each chapter building on the last, each transformation enabling the next. For those seeking to understand deeper:

Essential Reading: - "The Siemens Story: A History of Innovation" - Official company history - "From Corruption to Compliance" - Harvard Business Review case study on the 2006 scandal - Annual Reports 2018-2024 - The transformation in management's own words - "The Future of Manufacturing" - Roland Busch's vision essays

Technology Deep Dives: - Siemens Xcelerator Platform - Technical architecture and capabilities - Digital Twin Consortium white papers - Industry standards and implementations - Mendix low-code documentation - Understanding democratized development - Altair simulation galleries - Visualizing the power of computational design

Investment Resources: - Siemens Investor Relations portal - Financials, presentations, and guidance - Segment reporting breakdown - Understanding the sum of parts - Peer comparison tools - Benchmarking against industrial and software competitors - Sell-side research compilation - Consensus views and model assumptions

The transformation of Siemens from telegraph wires to artificial intelligence isn't just corporate evolution—it's a template for how established companies can navigate technological disruption. Not through revolution but through patient, strategic evolution. Not by abandoning the past but by building on it. Not by becoming a different company but by becoming a better version of itself.

For investors, executives, and students of business strategy, Siemens offers a masterclass in corporate transformation. The lesson isn't that every company should become a software company. It's that every company must understand what business it's really in—and have the courage to pursue that truth wherever it leads.

The pointer telegraph is long obsolete. The company that created it is anything but.