Chat with this content: Summary, Analysis, News...
Share on Reddit
Pandora A/S: The Story of the World's Largest Jewelry Brand
I. Introduction: From Copenhagen Charm to Global Phenomenon
In 2011, at the height of what appeared to be an unstoppable ascent, more than one piece of Pandora jewelry was sold every second on average. The Danish jewelry company, barely a decade into its charm bracelet phenomenon, had become the world's third-largest jewelry company. Then, almost overnight, the dream seemed to shatter. Shares fell nearly 80% in 2011 after a shift in focus to higher-end designs alienated core customers.
Seven years later, history would repeat itself. 2018 turned into Pandora's worst year since 2011, when it lost 84 percent in market value. The company that had revolutionized the jewelry industry with its collectible charm bracelet concept appeared destined for the retail graveyard.
Yet today, Pandora stands as the world's largest jewelry brand by volume, a phoenix risen not once but twice from the ashes of near-collapse. Revenue and EBIT increased by 13% to reach DKK 31.7 billion and DKK 8.0 billion, respectively in 2024. Pandora became the world's third-largest jewelry company in terms of sales, after Cartier and Tiffany & Co.
The central question of this deep dive: How did a small Copenhagen jewelry shop become the world's largest jewelry brand—and nearly lose it all twice?
The answer lies in understanding several intertwined themes: the genius and fragility of the "collectible business model," the competitive advantages of vertical integration, the perils of post-IPO strategic drift, and a sustainability pivot that may define the company's next chapter.
The $9.4 billion Danish brand makes silver bracelets and charms at its own factories in Thailand, and sells around the world, with the U.S. its biggest market. About 40% of Pandora's annual revenue is made in the fourth quarter, when it sells seven pieces every second during peak holiday shopping.
II. Origins: A Danish Goldsmith's Thai Connection (1982–1999)
The Founders
It all started in 1982. In a small jeweller's shop in modest surroundings in Copenhagen, Denmark, Danish goldsmith Per Enevoldsen and his wife Winnie began the journey of what would one day become Pandora. From the beginning, they often travelled to Thailand in search of jewellery for importing.
Per Enevoldsen came from jewelry royalty of a sort. Per's father, Algot Enevoldsen, was also a jeweler, a silversmith who made wonderful, modernistic jewelry in the 1950s, and it is his initials (ALE) that are stamped on all authentic Pandora pieces (the hallmark has belonged to the family since 1950). That tiny "ALE" stamp, visible on every piece of authentic Pandora jewelry today, connects a multi-billion dollar global empire to a Copenhagen silversmith's workshop seven decades ago.
Pandora was founded in 1982 by Danish goldsmith Per Enevoldsen and, his then-wife, Winnie Enevoldsen. The pair began on a small scale by importing jewelry from Thailand and selling to consumers.
The Thailand Pivot
What began as a sourcing relationship with Thailand evolved into something far more strategic. In 1987, the company ended its retail operations and became a pure wholesaler. This was the first of several pivotal strategic decisions that would define Pandora's trajectory.
In 1987, after several successful years as wholesalers, the retail activities were discontinued and the company moved to larger premises. Meanwhile, the first in-house designer joined the company and Pandora began to focus on creating its own unique jewelry. In 1989, the company decided to start manufacturing its jewelry in Thailand.
The decision to establish manufacturing in Thailand was transformative. With low production costs and an efficient supply chain, the Enevoldsens could provide affordable, hand-finished jewelry for the mass market. This strategic positioning—affordable luxury produced with artisanal quality—would become Pandora's enduring value proposition.
In 1989, Per and Winnie decided to move to Thailand and open up their own manufacturing facility. They started out with 10 employees, and invited their two in-house designers to join them to help train the local artisans.
Building the Foundation
Through the 1990s, Pandora refined its capabilities, developing in-house design while scaling production in Thailand. Per Enevoldsen still lives in Bangkok and continues to manage the production in Thailand. He said in an interview "At no stage did I ever dream Pandora would become what it has. One of the reasons is that we have always been too busy concentrating on new designs and product quality, that the success sneaks up on you."
The decision to vertically integrate early—controlling design, manufacturing, and increasingly distribution—would prove to be Pandora's most durable competitive advantage. But it was the product innovation at the turn of the millennium that would transform the business entirely.
III. The Charm Bracelet Invention: The Product That Changed Everything (2000)
The Development Story
The charm bracelet wasn't invented by Pandora. Pandora didn't invent the charm bracelet concept. The likes of Queen Victoria, Wallis Simpson, and Elizabeth Taylor donned similar styles back in their day. But Pandora made the charms bracelet both affordable and desirable.
The critical innovation emerged from a collaboration between Per Enevoldsen and Danish designer Lisbeth Enø Larsen. Much of the brand's success undeniably came from the iconic Pandora charm bracelet. The original bracelet design was developed in 2000 by Per Enevoldsen himself, with the help of Lisbeth Enø Larsen, a fellow Danish goldsmith and designer. Together they came up with the concept of selling a selection of handmade beads and charms on a metal cord. A sample collection quickly sold out.
It started selling its signature charm bracelets in 2000 after several years of development, protected by a patent.
The patented innovation centered on solving a practical problem. The patented bunching-prevention aspect of Pandora jewelry is recited in a family of 15 patents, including the US utility patent US7007507B2, titled Necklaces and bracelets with keepers. It is the system of "keepers" that prevent charms, baubles and beads, attached to a Pandora bracelet or necklace from bunching, that is specifically patented in Pandora jewelry.
Why the Charm Bracelet Worked
The business model was elegant in its simplicity. The collectible charm bracelet is our cornerstone product and fosters repeat purchases and customer loyalty. It is complemented by a growing range of other collections consistent with our core values of affordable and collectible jewelry.
Think of it as the "razor and blades" model applied to jewelry. While the brand sells necklaces, rings, and earrings, the bread and butter of the operation remains its charm bracelets, a cash cow that accounts for 80 percent of Pandora's sales.
Charms are indeed a genius concept from the product development perspective. Jewelry isn't a commodity product you need to replenish. Yet this brand entices shoppers to return to its stores without waiting for a special occasion. "People who buy one Pandora charm are more likely to come back, and keep coming back," says Jaime Barr, a US Footwear & Accessories expert at WGSN. "They keep the consumer hooked by rolling out new, trendy charms, essentially building a loyal base of clientele. It's an extremely smart way of building a business." And a profitable one too — over half of Pandora's revenue comes from charms sales.
The Gift-Giving Machine
The charm bracelet unlocked a powerful consumer behavior: predictable, repeat gifting. We believe the firm benefits from its global brand recognition and vast distribution channels, moderately strong pricing power enabled by the charms' low perceived value and recurring purchases, customer loyalty (around 70% of business from repeat buying and over 60% of revenue from gifting, which tends to be more brand-loyal), and cost advantage from manufacturing and purchasing scale.
This model did more than drive sales—it created emotional bonds between customers and the brand. As people celebrated birthdays, anniversaries, and other milestones with specific charms, their bracelets became personal keepsakes, not just accessories.
The company's well-known customisable charm bracelet is the key to its success. Designed to allow its fashion-conscious GenZ and Millennial customer base to express themselves, the regularly updated range of charms are not only a relatively low cost of entry to luxury jewellery, but the collectable nature of the charms leads to repeat business.
IV. Explosive International Expansion (2000–2010)
Market-by-Market Rollout
In 2000, Pandora's charm bracelet concept was first launched in the Danish market. Consumers embraced the concept, and in the following years, driven by growing demand, the company began to expand internationally, entering new markets such as the United States in 2003 – today the company's largest market – and Germany and Australia in 2004.
The U.S. expansion proved transformative. Pandora's bracelets came to the US in 2003, first at local gift shops and then at fine jewelry stores, prompting the company to set up an American headquarters in Maryland.
The reception exceeded expectations. "It was all anyone wanted to buy," recalls Florida jewelry boutique owner Spektor. The crowd at Maurice's became a common occurrence, and Spektor began to notice Pandora everywhere: at other fine jewelry stores, at kiosks at outdoor shopping centers, and, eventually, at Pandora's own retail stores in malls. Though to Spektor it seemed like "Pandora popped up out of nowhere and became an overnight success," that's not exactly the case.
The Production Scaling Challenge
To support the explosive growth, Pandora invested heavily in manufacturing infrastructure. In 2005, Pandora opened a large scale crafting facility in Gemopolis, a jewellery industry zone outside Bangkok.
In order to increase its production capacity, Pandora opened a large scale, six-story fully-owned manufacturing facility in Thailand in 2005, which still forms a central part of the current production and infrastructure. In August 2008 a second manufacturing facility was opened in the same area, which in 2010 was followed by the opening of Pandora's third and fourth facilities in the same area, further strengthening our unique production setup.
Last year, the company's Bangkok facilities crafted 117 million pieces, said Nils Helander, Pandora's senior vice president of manufacturing and managing director, adding that a combined total of 2.6 billion gemstones were hand-set by their craftsmen and women last year. "Last year we grew by 15 percent."
Private Equity Entry & IPO
The growth attracted institutional capital. The Danish private equity group Axcel bought a 60% stake in the company from the Enevoldsen family in 2008.
Two years later, Pandora went public in one of Europe's most significant offerings of the year. Shares totalling DKK 9.96 billion (US$ 1.84 billion) were sold in an IPO in October 2010, one of the biggest IPOs in Europe that year, giving Pandora a market capitalisation of around DKK 27 billion. The company is publicly listed on the NASDAQ OMX Copenhagen Stock Exchange in Denmark and is a component of the OMX Copenhagen 20 index.
By this point, Pandora was one of the world's three largest jewelry brands in 2009 measured by estimated retail revenue, present in more than 40 countries across six continents.
V. Crisis #1: The 2011 Collapse — Losing the Core Customer
What Went Wrong
The story of Pandora's first crisis is a cautionary tale about the perils of post-IPO strategic drift—and the particular danger of misunderstanding your core value proposition.
At its peak, In 2011, more than one piece of Pandora jewelry was sold every second on average. The company appeared unstoppable.
Then management made a fateful decision: to move upmarket.
Shares fell nearly 80% in 2011 after a shift in focus to higher-end designs alienated core customers, but performance recovered after a return to the more affordable mass market.
COPENHAGEN, Aug 2, 2011 (AFP) - Shares in Danish jewelry company Pandora plunged by more than 60 percent on Tuesday after the company cut its outlook and announced its chief executive had resigned.
This year is turning into Pandora's worst since 2011, when it lost 84 per cent in market value. Back then, the company fired its chief executive officer after he issued a profit warning just weeks after telling the market that profits would exceed expectations.
The strategic error was classic: chasing prestige over purpose. Pandora's power lay not in competing with Cartier or Tiffany, but in owning the "affordable luxury" segment where consumers could express themselves through collectible, meaningful jewelry without the premium price tag.
The Recovery
The recovery required a return to basics. Performance recovered after a return to the more affordable mass market, with the group reporting revenue of DKK 19 billion and net profit in excess of DKK 3 billion in 2014.
The lesson was clear: Pandora's competitive advantage resided in accessible luxury, not in trying to be something it wasn't. This insight would be forgotten again—with equally devastating consequences.
VI. The Growth Years & Building the Empire (2012–2017)
Strategic Partnerships
With its identity clarified, Pandora entered a period of extraordinary growth. The company pursued brand partnerships that extended its reach without diluting its positioning.
In 2014, Pandora signed a strategic alliance with The Walt Disney Company. Ring sales reached 10% of Group revenue.
In 2019, the company launched a new range of jewelry, Pandora Me, and began a partnership with UNICEF. In 2019, the company also launched the Harry Potter collection, which marked the beginning of the partnership with Warner Bros.
Retail Network Expansion
The company aggressively expanded its concept store network. 2016: New Lockets concept was launched. Opened concept store no. 2,000. 2017: Opened new crafting facility in Lamphun, near Chiang Mai, in Northern Thailand.
The company opened concept stores around the world before its franchising model began in Australia in 2009.
Pandora launched an online sales platform in Europe in 2011, and began working to expand its e-commerce to the majority of its markets including Australia.
After growing at an astounding 20.4 percent compound annual growth rate (CAGR) from 2013 through 2017, from $1.3 billion (DKK 9.0 billion) to $3.3 billion (DKK 22.8 billion), revenues were flat in 2018.
That flat revenue in 2018 would prove to be the harbinger of Pandora's second existential crisis.
VII. Crisis #2: The 2018-2019 Meltdown — When Charms Lost Their Charm
The Warning Signs
By 2017, trouble was brewing again. Pandora lost more than a quarter of its market value in 2017 as its U.S. business was pummelled by a weak retail environment.
Pandora stock crashed 24% on Tuesday after the firm slashed its sales forecast for 2018. On Thursday, it reported that charm sales declined 7% in the first quarter.
Hedge funds started spotting opportunities to make money shorting the stock, and Pandora became a target for speculators expecting it to continue declining.
Not since August 2011 has Pandora A/S lost more of its value in a single day. The Danish jewelry maker, which became a favorite target of hedge funds last year, sank 16 percent after revealing weaker numbers than investors and analysts were expecting. Pandora's dramatic slowdown in sales to China, spelled out in its first-quarter results on Tuesday, was a particular disappointment. All in all, the share move wiped about $1.6 billion off its market value, leaving it worth less than $10 billion by the end of the day.
The Deeper Issues
The problems ran deeper than a weak retail environment. There were fundamental issues with design freshness, brand perception, and channel management.
Founded in 1982 by Danish jeweler Per & Winnie Enevoldsen, Pandora rapidly got global consumers hooked on wearing their hearts on their sleeves. But despite having huge brand awareness and a well-performing product, up until recently Pandora's business was bleak. In 2019 alone, company profits dropped by 40%. Inventory wasn't moving. Audiences became disenchanted with the company's bling. And Pandora's leadership admitted to having a full-blown brand identity crisis.
Pandora had a flawed merchandising strategy. Independent stockists complained that they were denied access to some inventory, reserved solely for Pandora stores. Or deliveries got purposefully delayed. As a result, they had to heavily discount the older collections to prevent deadstock. This was impacting Pandora's brand value.
Programme NOW: The Turnaround Plan
Pandora's response was Programme NOW, a comprehensive turnaround effort. Lacik, who is from Sweden, succeeds Anders Colding Friis, who parted ways with the embattled company in August, and will be tasked with spearheading its recently launched Programme Now, a two-year turnaround roadmap geared at driving sustainable growth and reigniting brand heat.
Leadership Overhaul: Enter Alexander Lacik
The critical appointment came in February 2019. Alexander Lacik (54) brings international experience from growth and brand building in global consumer companies. He joins Pandora from the position as CEO of Britax Ltd., a world leader in child safety products. Prior to this, he was President of North America at RB (Reckitt Benckiser) from 2013-2017 and has held key management positions with the leading global consumer goods company since 2004. Previously, Lacik held positions in sales and marketing with Procter & Gamble from 1992 to 2004.
Peder Tuborgh, Chairman of the Board of Directors says: "I am delighted that we have secured Alexander Lacik as CEO of Pandora. Alexander is a strong match for our recently announced strategic direction and will be instrumental in executing Programme NOW. Alexander is a brilliant marketer and brand architect."
Lacik's background was unusual for a jewelry CEO—he came from consumer goods, not luxury. But that proved to be exactly what Pandora needed: someone who understood brand building, mass-market execution, and turnaround operations.
He was tasked with executing back-to-back two-year turnaround plans, "Progamme Now," and "Phoenix." "Programme Now" focused on cutting costs and stabilizing sales for the then-struggling company.
VIII. The Phoenix Strategy: Rising from the Ashes (2021–Present)
The Strategic Framework
With Programme NOW stabilizing the business, Lacik launched a more ambitious growth strategy in 2021. In 2021, the brand launched its Phoenix strategy, designed to usher in a new phase of growth via four pillars believed to deliver sustainable and profitable revenue growth: investing in brand perception; leveraging consumer insight to inform product design; personalising the customer experience; and investing in its core markets, particularly in the US and China.
Following the disruption of the pandemic, Lacik implemented a strategic plan called Phoenix. "As the myth tells us, the phoenix bird possesses superpowers, most notably the ability to heal itself from any wound and emerge stronger and more beautiful. The phoenix bird is a primal symbol of change," he explained. "Our Phoenix strategy was a response to some failings in the past, and I'm pleased to report that the strategy is serving us very well."
The Four Pillars of Phoenix
The strategy rested on four interconnected pillars:
Consumers want to associate themselves with brands that carry a strong point of view. It's why the first pillar of our Phoenix strategy focuses on brand perception. The third pillar focuses on personalisation and experiences. Jewellery is inherently connected to self-expression, so we are working to make it easier and more enjoyable for customers to express themselves through these purchases. Then the fourth and final pillar speaks to market dynamics — it's the core markets where we see the most growth potential to deliver the best value for our stakeholders.
Rebranding Beyond Charms
A critical element of Phoenix was transforming Pandora's brand perception from "the charm bracelet company" to a comprehensive jewelry brand. Investing in brand elevation has two strategic purposes for Pandora. The first is around developing perception and awareness beyond our charm bracelet — a product for which, until more recently, we were best known. We have since expanded our product offering via materials like silver, gold and lab-grown diamonds and raising awareness of this shift is key.
Alexander Lacik, President and CEO of Pandora, says: "Our strategy continues to take Pandora to new heights despite general consumer spending being somewhat sluggish. We have successfully started the journey to make Pandora known as a full jewellery brand, and our results show that consumers like what they see."
Results and Growth
The strategy has since yielded positive results — it ended 2023 with 8 percent growth and revenue of more than $4 billion.
2024 was another successful year for Pandora. Delivering on the Phoenix strategy, Pandora continued to elevate itself as a full jewellery brand, driving more consumers into the brand. Revenue and EBIT increased by 13% to reach DKK 31.7 billion and DKK 8.0 billion, respectively. Organic growth ended at 13% (guidance of "11-12%"), comprising of like-for-like (LFL) of 7% and network expansion of 5%.
The Danish jewelry giant said it was heading for another solid year after revenues continued to grow in the fourth quarter, the sixth consecutive period to see double-digit organic growth. "There's still so much growth opportunity for Pandora, so there is no consolidation, we keep investing in growing the business, in line with [what we have done]," Alexander Lacik told WWD.
IX. The Lab-Grown Diamond Bet: Disrupting from Within
The Strategic Move
In May 2021, Pandora made a bold strategic announcement: it would phase out mined diamonds entirely in favor of lab-grown alternatives. In 2021, Pandora committed to using only lab-grown diamonds and has since launched three collections and a campaign, which sends the message that lab-grown is not just more accessible in pricing, but kinder to the planet.
In May 2021, Pandora launched the company's first jewellery collection featuring lab-created diamonds. The collection, called Pandora Brilliance, was initially introduced as a trial in the UK with a decision on global roll-out to come later. At the same time, Pandora announced that it would no longer use mined diamonds.
Why It Makes Sense
The decision aligned perfectly with Pandora's positioning. Lab-created diamonds are just as beautiful as mined diamonds, but available to more people and with lower carbon emissions. We are proud to broaden the diamond market and offer innovative jewellery that sets a new standard for how the industry can reduce its impact on the planet," said Pandora CEO Alexander Lacik.
Pandora is also embracing lab-grown diamonds, which have a significantly lower carbon footprint than mined diamonds. This initiative allows the company to offer diamond jewellery at more affordable price points, democratizing luxury and making it accessible to a wider audience.
The Sustainability Angle
With a significantly lower carbon footprint compared to mined diamonds. Pandora Lab-Grown Diamonds come with just 5% of the CO2 emissions, having been grown, cut and polished using 100% renewable energy and set in 100% recycled silver and gold.
Pandora's lab-created diamonds are grown, cut and polished using 100% renewable energy and have a carbon footprint of only 8.17 kg CO2e per carat – five percent of that of a mined diamond. The lab-created diamonds are grown in the U.S. and point to a future of low-carbon diamonds for jewellery and industrial use. For perspective, if all diamonds were mined with the same low carbon footprint as Pandora's lab-created diamonds, it would save more than 6 million tons of CO2e annually.
While lab-grown diamonds still represent only about 1% of Pandora's total revenue, the category has shown strong momentum. Pandora said its lab-grown diamonds performed well, with sales up 12 percent year-over-year at actual exchange rates in Q4 and up 19 percent for the full year. Like-for-like sales grew 18 percent in Q4 and 43 percent for the full year.
X. Sustainability as Competitive Advantage
The 100% Recycled Metals Milestone
Pandora's sustainability strategy extends far beyond lab-grown diamonds. In a industry-leading move, the company committed to—and achieved—a complete transition to recycled precious metals.
In a ground-breaking move, Pandora has ditched the mining of precious metals and instead turned to recycled silver and gold for all its jewellery. This shift in sourcing by the world's biggest jewellery brand is not just significant for Pandora, and the planet – but the entire jewellery industry.
As of August 2024, all our jewellery has been crafted using 100% recycled silver and gold sourced from certified, responsible refiners, which is well ahead of our 2025 target. By sourcing recycled instead of newly-mined silver and gold, Pandora avoids around 58,000 tonnes of CO2 per year.
In 2020, Pandora set a target to source 100% recycled silver and gold by 2025, and now the company has reached this milestone earlier than expected – by the end of 2023 – thanks to strong commitment from its suppliers.
The Financial Implications
The annual added cost of using 100% recycled silver and gold is around USD 10 million. Given Pandora's scale and margins, this represents a modest investment for substantial environmental and brand benefits.
Pandora sells more than 100 million pieces of jewellery annually, and the shift avoids significant greenhouse gas emissions, as mining requires more energy and resources than recycling. The carbon footprint of recycled silver is one-third compared to mined silver, while the recycling of gold produces less than 1% of the carbon emissions from mining new gold.
Integrated Sustainability Strategy
To reach that milestone, more than 100 employees were involved in a transformation that lasted four years. The program covered everything from the refineries from which it buys metal directly to suppliers that make components such as clasps and certain chains. More than 40 suppliers — including multinational precious metals suppliers such as Umicore and MKS PAMP — changed their business processes to comply, the company said.
XI. The Vertical Integration Playbook
Manufacturing Excellence
Pandora's competitive moat is built on deep vertical integration. Pandora operates and manages a vertically integrated business model from in-house design and production to global marketing and direct distribution in most markets.
Pandora's products are available in more than 100 countries on six continents through more than 6,700 points of sale, including around 2,600 concept stores.
Pandora employs 37,000 people worldwide and crafts its jewellery using only recycled silver and gold.
The Thailand Operations
Thailand remains the heart of Pandora's manufacturing. Since then, we have expanded our operations, most recently in 2017 where we opened a crafting facility in Lamphun near Chiang Mai in Northern Thailand and in 2018 when we opened the Triple A facility in Gemopolis.
Bangkok – April 19, 2017: PANDORA, the world's largest jewellery manufacturer and exporter, is investing over nine billion baht to expand its production capacity in Thailand, implementing three strategic initiatives to support increasing global demand for jewellery. PANDORA is investing with an aim to double its production capacity within the next five years.
Pandora outlined plans last week for its new $100 million manufacturing facility in Vietnam, its third factory and first outside Thailand. Pandora and Vietnamese officials signed a memorandum of understanding regarding the project in Vietnam's Binh Duong Province, located about 40 km (about 25 miles) north of Ho Chi Minh City. Pandora's factory will employ 6,000 craftspeople. The company said construction is set to begin in early 2023, with the facility slated to start producing jewelry by the end of 2024.
Why Vertical Integration Matters
The margin impact is substantial. The Q2 gross margin reached another all-time high of 80.2%, +210bp vs. Q2 2023, supported by Pandora's vertically integrated business model, price increases and cost efficiencies.
Pandora A/S reported its third-quarter 2025 financial results, highlighting a 6% organic growth and maintaining strong gross margins around 80%. The company's return on capital remains robust at 43%.
An 80% gross margin in the jewelry industry is extraordinary. For context, most jewelry retailers operate with gross margins in the 40-60% range. Pandora's vertical integration—controlling everything from raw material sourcing to retail distribution—creates structural cost advantages that competitors struggle to replicate.
XII. Competitive Position and Strategic Analysis
The Jewelry Market Landscape
The global jewelry market is highly competitive, with well-known luxury brands, independent designers, and online jewelry companies all vying for customers. Leading players like LVMH (Tiffany & Co., Bulgari), Richemont (Cartier, Van Cleef & Arpels), and Chow Tai Fook dominate the industry with their strong brand reputations, high-quality craftsmanship, and global store networks. These brands compete by offering exclusive designs, luxury experiences, and sustainability efforts to attract high-end customers. At the same time, mid-range and affordable jewelry brands like Pandora, Swarovski, and Signet Jewelers provide stylish and budget-friendly alternatives, appealing to a wider audience.
The global Jewelry market size was valued at USD 371.41 billion in 2024 and is expected to reach USD 566.86 billion by 2033, with a growing CAGR of 4.81%.
Porter's Five Forces Analysis
Threat of New Entrants: MODERATE The jewelry market has relatively low barriers to entry for small-scale players, but building the scale, brand recognition, and vertically integrated supply chain that Pandora has achieved requires substantial capital and decades of development.
Bargaining Power of Suppliers: LOW Pandora's scale—buying about 340 tonnes of silver annually, about 6 percent of the overall market globally—gives it substantial leverage with suppliers. The shift to recycled metals has actually increased supplier switching costs.
Bargaining Power of Buyers: MODERATE Individual consumers have significant choice in the jewelry market, but the emotional attachment to charm bracelets and the collectible model creates meaningful switching costs. Around 70% of business comes from repeat buying.
Threat of Substitutes: MODERATE Alternative forms of self-expression and gift-giving exist, from other jewelry categories to non-jewelry accessories. However, Pandora's unique positioning in meaningful, collectible jewelry creates defensibility.
Competitive Rivalry: HIGH The jewelry market is intensely competitive across segments. Pandora faces pressure from luxury brands moving downmarket and mass-market brands moving up.
Hamilton Helmer's 7 Powers Framework
Scale Economies: Pandora benefits significantly from production scale in Thailand, where volume purchases of commodities gives PANDORA a cost advantage and operational leverage.
Network Effects: Limited direct network effects, though social validation of charm bracelets creates indirect network benefits.
Counter-Positioning: Pandora's affordable luxury positioning makes it difficult for luxury competitors to respond without cannibalizing their own premium pricing.
Switching Costs: The collectible charm model creates meaningful switching costs—customers who have invested in building a bracelet collection have strong reasons to continue purchasing Pandora.
Branding: Pandora has emerged as a digital leader in consumer brands and is now ranked among the world's 100 most valuable brands and 50 most sustainable companies.
Cornered Resource: Thailand's jewelry crafting ecosystem and Pandora's trained workforce of over 13,000 represent a difficult-to-replicate resource advantage.
Process Power: Decades of refining vertically integrated operations have created process advantages in speed-to-market, quality control, and cost management.
XIII. The Investment Case
Bull Case
The bull case for Pandora rests on several pillars:
-
Dominant market position in affordable luxury jewelry: "As the only global player in the accessible luxury jewelry market, Pandora continues to benefit from the shift towards strong brands in a largely fragmented industry with a large runway for growth ahead."
-
Structural margin advantage: 80% gross margins and ~25% EBIT margins supported by vertical integration create substantial profit durability.
-
"Full jewelry brand" transformation: The objective to restage the Pandora brand is visible in the numbers; LFL growth in the "Core" segment ended 2024 with 2% growth whilst the "Fuel with more" segment drove 22% growth.
-
Sustainability leadership: First-mover advantage in recycled metals and lab-grown diamonds positions Pandora well for increasingly ESG-conscious consumers.
-
Capital allocation discipline: Consistent shareholder returns through dividends and buybacks. Proposed dividend of DKK 20 per share and a new share buyback programme of DKK 4.0 billion.
Bear Case
The bear case centers on:
-
Charm bracelet concentration risk: Despite diversification efforts, charm bracelets remain Pandora's backbone—accounting for about 74% of sales. Fashion risk remains real.
-
Commodity price exposure: The jeweler's commercial and pricing strategy would be "potentially very challenging" if silver rose above $45 per ounce.
-
Geographic concentration in Thailand: U.S. tariffs on Thai imports (currently 19%) create structural cost headwinds. Pandora is mainly affected by the tariff placed on U.S. imports from Thailand where the majority of its jewelry is manufactured.
-
China challenges: China logged a 33 percent slump in like-for-like sales.
-
Leadership transition risk: With CEO Alexander Lacik retiring in March 2026, continuity of strategic execution becomes a consideration.
XIV. Leadership Transition and What's Next
Alexander Lacik's Legacy
Since joining Pandora as President and CEO in April 2019, Alexander Lacik has led a successful turnaround and launched the Phoenix strategy to transform Pandora into a full jewellery brand. Under his leadership, revenue has grown by 45%, and the global workforce has expanded from 24,000 to 37,000. Pandora has emerged as a digital leader in consumer brands and is now ranked among the world's 100 most valuable brands and 50 most sustainable companies.
The New Leadership
Pandora today announced that Alexander Lacik has decided to retire at the next annual general meeting on 11 March 2026 after almost seven years as President and CEO of Pandora. He will hand over to Chief Marketing Officer (CMO) Berta de Pablos-Barbier who will become the new President and CEO. She will lead the company's continued strategic evolution as a full jewellery brand, building on the strong results during Alexander Lacik's tenure.
Berta de Pablos-Barbier is a Spanish national with 30 years of international executive experience from global luxury and consumer goods brands. Before joining Pandora, she served as President & CEO of LVMH's champagne brands Moët & Chandon, Dom Perignon and Mercier, and prior to that she was the Chief Growth Officer of Mars Wrigley, CMO of Lacoste, and VP of Marketing & Communications at Kering-owned jeweller Boucheron.
Pablos-Barbier will be the first woman to lead Pandora.
2025 Outlook and Beyond
In Q3 2025, Pandora delivered organic revenue growth of 6% despite the turbulent macroeconomic backdrop. The organic growth comprised of like-for-like (LFL) growth of 2% and network expansion etc. of 4%. LFL growth in the US and Rest of Pandora remained robust at 6%. Overall LFL growth in Europe was -1% with the four European markets disclosed separately weighing on growth.
Pandora maintains guidance for 2025 of "7-8% organic growth". LFL growth is now expected to be 3-4% (previously 4-5%) and network expansion 4% (previously 3%). The EBIT margin guidance for 2025 is also maintained at "around 24%".
Alexander Lacik, President and CEO of Pandora, says: "We continue our growth journey and delivered sound performance in a quarter marked by the challenging macroeconomic environment. We are intensifying our efforts to drive brand heat, and the initial response to our new product launches demonstrates how we can continue to unlock market potential with our combination of innovation, affordability and emotional storytelling."
XV. Key Performance Indicators for Investors
For investors tracking Pandora's ongoing performance, three KPIs merit closest attention:
1. Like-for-Like (LFL) Growth
This measures same-store sales growth, excluding network expansion effects. It reveals the underlying health of brand demand and is the truest indicator of whether Pandora's positioning resonates with consumers. Pandora's LFL growth targets 3-4% for 2025.
2. Gross Margin
Pandora's ~80% gross margin is exceptional in the industry and reflects its vertically integrated advantages. Pressure on this metric—from rising silver prices, tariffs, or competitive dynamics—would signal structural challenges to the business model.
3. "Fuel with More" Segment Growth
This segment captures Pandora's efforts to diversify beyond charms into rings, earrings, necklaces, and lab-grown diamonds. Double-digit growth here (22% in 2024) indicates successful brand transformation; weakness would suggest the charm dependency remains acute.
XVI. Conclusion: The Lessons of Pandora
Pandora's journey offers several enduring lessons for investors and business strategists:
Know Your Customer: Both of Pandora's crises stemmed from strategic drift away from core customers. The 2011 push upmarket and the 2017-2019 brand confusion both violated the fundamental principle that Pandora serves accessible luxury consumers seeking self-expression, not prestige seekers competing with Cartier.
Vertical Integration Creates Moats: Pandora's 80% gross margins and consistent profitability trace directly to its control of the entire value chain. In an era of fragmented supply chains, this integration provides durability.
Collectible Models Drive Loyalty: The charm bracelet's genius lies in converting one-time jewelry purchases into ongoing relationships. With 70% repeat purchase rates, Pandora has achieved something rare in retail.
Sustainability Can Be Strategy: Pandora's move to recycled metals and lab-grown diamonds isn't mere greenwashing—it's strategic positioning that differentiates the brand, appeals to younger consumers, and potentially reduces long-term cost volatility.
Turnarounds Require Outsiders: Both of Pandora's recoveries were led by executives with consumer goods backgrounds (Lacik from Reckitt Benckiser) rather than jewelry industry veterans. Fresh perspectives proved essential to breaking ingrained patterns.
The central question we posed at the outset—how did a small Copenhagen jewelry shop become the world's largest jewelry brand, and nearly lose it all twice?—has a clear answer. Pandora's rise came from product innovation (the charm bracelet), operational excellence (vertical integration in Thailand), and disciplined positioning (affordable luxury). Its near-collapses came from forgetting these fundamentals, from strategic drift toward positioning its brand couldn't authentically occupy.
Today's Pandora is a very different company than the one Alexander Lacik inherited in 2019. With 37,000 employees, DKK 31.7 billion in revenue, industry-leading sustainability credentials, and a clear strategic direction under Phoenix, the foundation appears solid.
But the jewelry business remains fashion-adjacent, subject to shifting tastes and competitive pressures. Pandora's charm bracelet, now 25 years old as a product concept, must continue evolving to stay relevant. The lab-grown diamond bet must scale. The China challenge must be addressed. And the incoming CEO must navigate this transition while preserving strategic continuity.
For all its transformation, Pandora remains fundamentally what Per and Winnie Enevoldsen envisioned in that modest Copenhagen shop forty-three years ago: beautiful jewelry, accessible to many, that allows people to tell their stories. The stories on customers' wrists have changed with each new charm. The company's story, through boom and bust and boom again, continues to be written.
Spotify
Apple Podcasts
Amazon Music
Audible
YouTube
Castbox
Pocket Casts