Itochu Corporation: The Maverick Trading House That Defied Gravity

I. Introduction & Episode Setup

Picture this: Tokyo, January 2015. While commodity prices are cratering and Japan's mighty trading houses are bleeding red ink, Masahiro Okafuji stands before a packed press conference to announce something unthinkable. Itochu—historically the smallest of Japan's Big Five sogo shosha—is about to write the largest check in its 157-year history. ¥600 billion. Not for an oil field in the Middle East or a copper mine in Chile, but for a 20% stake in CITIC, China's state-backed conglomerate.

The room goes silent. Journalists exchange glances. Has Okafuji lost his mind?

This wasn't just any investment. Together with Thailand's CP Group, Itochu was committing ¥1.2 trillion to a deal that would make it the largest foreign shareholder in a Chinese state enterprise. The timing seemed catastrophic—China's growth was slowing, the Shanghai Composite had just begun what would become a 45% crash, and every other Japanese trading house was retreating from aggressive expansion.

But here's the thing about Itochu: they've never played by the rules of Japan Inc. While Mitsubishi and Mitsui built empires on natural resources and heavy industry, Itochu started as a linen peddler. While competitors maintained armies of 40,000+ employees, Itochu ran lean with 4,000. And while other trading houses worked their salarymen into the ground with midnight oil and weekend marathons, Okafuji had done something radical—he turned off the lights at 10 PM and told everyone to go home.

How did a textile trader founded by a door-to-door salesman become Japan's most profitable trading house? How did a company that nearly collapsed in the 1990s transform itself into Warren Buffett's favorite Japanese investment? And what can the story of Itochu teach us about strategy, culture, and the art of being a contrarian in a conformist society?

This is the story of three transformations: from textiles to everything, from follower to leader, and from the old Japan Inc. playbook to something entirely new. It's about betting on consumers when everyone else was betting on commodities, investing in China when others were pulling out, and proving that in business, as in life, sometimes the best way forward is to go against the grain.

The numbers tell part of the story—¥11 trillion in revenues, consistently outearning competitors with twice the headcount, the only major trading house to increase profits during the 2015-2016 commodity crash. But the real story is about something harder to quantify: how culture became Itochu's greatest competitive advantage.

Let's start where all great business stories begin—with an ambitious young entrepreneur and a radical idea about how to sell fabric door-to-door in 19th century Japan.

↑ Back to Top

II. Origins: From Linen Peddler to Trading Empire (1858-1949)

The summer heat in Osaka was suffocating on that August day in 1858, but fifteen-year-old Chubei Itoh barely noticed. He had walked for three days from his village in Shiga Prefecture, carrying bundles of linen cloth that weighed nearly as much as he did. His feet were bleeding through his straw sandals, but his mind was fixed on a singular vision: he would become a door-to-door wholesaler of linen in the regions between Osaka and Kyushu.

This wasn't romantic entrepreneurship—it was survival. The son of a rice and sake merchant in Toyosato village, Chubei had watched his father's traditional business struggle as Japan cracked open to the world. Japan had just concluded the Treaty of Amity and Commerce with five countries—the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Russia, and the Netherlands—opening an era of free trade. While samurai debated and domains fought, a teenage cloth peddler saw opportunity where others saw chaos.

The sight of foreigners, battleships, and foreign trading posts astonished Chubei and sparked his curiosity. He became convinced of the limitless potential of commerce. But Chubei's genius wasn't in what he sold—it was how he sold it. In an era when merchants were considered the lowest social class, barely above outcasts, he introduced something radical: treating his workers like human beings.

By 1872, after fourteen years of walking those dusty roads, Itoh founded the "Benchu" drapery store in the Honmachi district of Osaka. He chose Honmachi, anticipating the future development of the area, because it was accessible by road from Kawaguchi-cho, where boats could dock, and the cost of land was less than half that in Fushimi-machi—the established textile district. It was his first contrarian bet.

But the real revolution happened inside Benchu's walls. Once Benchu was open, Chubei drew up a charter. In it, he set out his workers' rights and duties, unique for the time, to ensure that all workers, including junior staff, could work to their utmost capabilities. This wasn't mere kindness—it was strategic. In feudal Japan, where loyalty was extracted through fear and hierarchy, Chubei created loyalty through respect and profit-sharing.

The business exploded. By 1884, Benchu became "Itoh Honten" (Itoh Head Office). In 1893, Itoh established Itoh Itomise (Thread and Yarn Store), from which C. Itoh & Company and ITOCHU were directly descended. The timing was perfect—Japan's industrial revolution was beginning, and every factory needed thread.

Then came the succession test. Chubei Itoh died in 1903 and his second son, also named Chubei, inherited the business. The younger Itoh was well trained and proved to be every bit as adept in business affairs as his father. Chubei II inherited more than a business—he inherited a philosophy that would prove prescient.

He turned his attention to overseas markets from an early stage, making the export department independent as the Ito export store, and opening branch offices in Shanghai, South Korea, the Philippines, and Manila. He travelled to London in 1910 and began direct procurement and financing in the London markets, which considerably improved margins, as it had previously used more expensive intermediaries in Japan.

The London trip revealed something shocking. He discovered that the shokan, who presented themselves as powerful international figures in Japan, were actually small agencies with relatively little influence overseas. The middlemen who had been extracting massive commissions were paper tigers. Chubei II immediately set about building direct relationships, cutting out intermediaries—a pattern Itochu would repeat for the next century.

World War I brought crisis and opportunity. In July 1914, World War I began, and he experienced a sharp drop in the market prices of raw silk and cotton yarn. Uncertainty about the course of the war caused the Japanese economy to temporarily fall into turmoil, with the stock market crashing and bank runs occurring. But Chubei II had learned from his father: crisis creates opportunity for those with liquidity and courage.

By 1914, the company reorganized as C. Itoh & Company, becoming one of Japan's first modern corporations. The 1920s brought explosive growth as Japan industrialized, but also brought the company's first existential crisis. A serious recession led C. Itoh deeply into debt; it was forced to restructure and was renamed the Marubeni Company; Daido Trading was created from a division of C. Itoh Trading.

The splitting and merging that followed reads like a corporate soap opera. Itoh merged with Marubeni and Kishimoto & Company to form Sanko K.K. The Japanese government then ordered Sanko, Daido Trading, and a subsidiary called Kureha Textiles to merge and form a new company, Daiken Manufacturing. This was wartime Japan—the government needed massive conglomerates to fuel the war machine. But then came December 1949—the moment that would define modern Itochu. After World War II, the constituent companies of Daiken were spun off from each other in December 1949 as part of GHQ efforts to dismantle the war-era zaibatsu. The Allied occupation's General Headquarters had a mission: break up Japan's massive industrial conglomerates that had fueled the war machine. In 1946, Daiken Co., Ltd. was designated as a restricted company along with 46 subsidiaries, and was placed under the strict supervision of the Holding Company Liquidation Committee. In 1947, in accordance with the Law for Elimination of Excessive Concentration of Economic Power, Daiken Co., Ltd. decided on a corporate restructuring plan centered on the separation of the manufacturing and trading divisions. It was decided to split into four new companies: ITOCHU Corporation, Marubeni Corporation, and Amagasaki Nail Works, Ltd.

It was corporate surgery without anesthesia. One company became four overnight. Brothers became competitors. Colleagues became rivals. Itoh re-listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange in 1950. The new Itochu had to start almost from scratch—a fraction of its former size, stripped of its manufacturing assets, left with only its trading DNA.

But here's what the occupiers didn't understand about Japanese business: you can break up a company, but you can't break up relationships. The textile traders who had worked together for decades maintained their networks. The China connections cultivated since the 1890s remained intact. The merchant mindset—that DNA of finding opportunity in chaos—couldn't be legislated away.

As Itochu emerged from the ashes of dissolution, it carried forward three critical assets that no occupation force could confiscate: a culture of treating workers with dignity that dated back to Chubei's original charter, deep relationships in Asian markets that competitors couldn't match, and most importantly, the scrappy mindset of a door-to-door linen peddler who never forgot that in business, as in life, you eat what you kill.

The stage was set for one of business history's greatest comebacks. But first, Itochu would have to learn how to be a sogo shosha—a general trading company—in a world that was about to change beyond recognition.

↑ Back to Top

III. The Sogo Shosha Era: Building the Conglomerate (1950s-1990s)

Spring 1950. Tokyo Station. Uichiro Kosuge, the new president of the freshly reconstituted Itochu Corporation, stood on the platform watching American military supply trains rumble past. The Korean War had just begun, and with it, Japan's economic miracle. But Kosuge wasn't thinking about miracles. He was thinking about survival.

The new Itochu established its head office at 2-36 Honmachi, Higashi-ku, Osaka, and began domestic sales and import/export operations in just three fields: textiles, machinery, and general goods. It was a shadow of its former self—4,000 employees versus the tens of thousands at Mitsubishi and Mitsui. No captive bank. No heavy industry. No zaibatsu legacy. Just a trading license and a reputation for knowing how to move goods.

The Korean War changed everything. Itoh resumed business by bartering Japanese textiles for foreign grain, and resumed trading in petroleum, aircraft, automobiles and machinery to meet UN forces requirements during the Korean War. Since 1950, The Korean War gave further impetus to the Japanese economy, and ITOCHU greatly improved its performance in import and export transactions.

But while competitors rushed to build steel mills and oil refineries, Itochu zagged. They stayed lean, stayed nimble, stayed focused on trading rather than owning. It was necessity disguised as strategy—they simply didn't have the capital to compete in heavy industry. What they had was something more valuable: relationships.

Then came March 1972—a moment that would define Itochu for the next fifty years. President Echigo led a delegation to Beijing at a time when China was still largely closed to the world. When a mission led by then President Mr. Echigo visited China in March 1972, ITOCHU was officially recognized as a friendly trading company by the Chinese government, and continued to play significant roles in promoting friendship and trade between Japan and China.

This wasn't just a business designation—it was a golden ticket. Itochu was the first company to be designated as a friendly trading company by the Chinese government in 1972, and this happened six months before Japan and China even normalized diplomatic relations. While other Japanese companies were still debating whether to engage with Communist China, Itochu was already inside, building relationships that would take competitors decades to replicate.

The China connection wasn't accidental. Itochu had maintained shadow networks in China since the 1890s, even through war and revolution. They understood something fundamental: in Asia, business isn't about contracts—it's about trust. And trust takes generations to build.

Meanwhile, back in Japan, Itochu was transforming into something unprecedented—a true sogo shosha, a general trading company that could handle anything from copper wire to cappuccino machines. The diversification was dizzying. By the 1980s, ITOCHU's transformation into a general trading company progressed rapidly, expanding beyond textiles into machinery, chemicals, energy, and food.

The machine that emerged was uniquely Japanese yet distinctly un-Japanese. While Mitsubishi built their empire on vertical integration and Mitsui on banking relationships, Itochu built theirs on something more ephemeral: information arbitrage and relationship capital. They became the matchmakers of global commerce—connecting American car manufacturers with Japanese partners, Australian miners with Chinese steel mills, Brazilian farmers with Japanese consumers.

In 1970, Sejima and his younger protege Minoru Murofushi arranged a joint venture between General Motors and Isuzu, one of the first tie-ups between US and Japanese automakers. In 1971, the company successfully assisted in arranging a basic contract for cooperation between General Motors of the United States and Isuzu of Japan. This wasn't just deal-making—it was economic diplomacy.

The 1980s brought the bubble economy, and with it, a dangerous temptation. Every other trading house was gorging on real estate, buying Rockefeller Center and Pebble Beach. Itochu played along, but never with the same conviction. They kept their focus on trading, on relationships, on the unglamorous business of moving stuff from where it was to where it needed to be.

By 1992, the company had grown confident enough to shed its Western name. C. Itoh & Co. became Itochu Corporation—a signal that they no longer needed to hide behind an anglicized identity. The timing seemed perfect. Japan was on top of the world, and Itochu had reached the summit—briefly becoming Japan's largest trading company in the early 1990s.

But pride, as they say, comes before the fall. The bubble burst with spectacular violence. Real estate prices crashed 60%. The Nikkei fell 75%. Banks that had seemed invincible suddenly teetered on collapse. And Itochu, despite its caution, wasn't immune.

In 1994, the Company wrote off US$662 million in nonperforming assets in the aftermath of the bursting of the Japanese bubble economy. But this was just the beginning. The bad loans kept surfacing like bodies after a shipwreck.

In 1997, the real pain began. The company introduced its Division Company system for autonomous management—corporate speak for "every division for itself." The idea was radical for a Japanese company: instead of central planning, each division would operate like an independent company, responsible for its own profits and losses. It was either brilliant or desperate. Maybe both.

In late 1997, ITOCHU continued to restructure with the disposal or writing off of ¥230 billion (US$1.8 billion) in bad loans and nonperforming assets. The numbers were staggering, but the human cost was worse. For the first time in its modern history, Itochu had to do what was once unthinkable in Japan—massive layoffs.

As the 1990s ended, Itochu faced an existential question: What is a trading company in an age when anyone with an internet connection can be a trader? They had survived wars, occupation, and economic collapse. But could they survive irrelevance?

The answer would come from an unlikely source—a chain-smoking workaholic named Uichiro Niwa who believed the only way to save the company was to destroy it first.

↑ Back to Top

IV. Crisis and Restructuring: The Lost Decade (1990s-2000s)

Tokyo, April 1998. The cherry blossoms were in full bloom outside Itochu's headquarters, but inside, the mood was funereal. The company had just posted its worst results in decades. Bad loans were hemorrhaging from every division like blood from a thousand cuts. Morale had collapsed. The best talent was fleeing to foreign banks. And into this disaster walked a 61-year-old chain smoker named Uichiro Niwa, who had spent his entire career in the unglamorous food division.

"Gentlemen," Niwa said at his first board meeting, lighting yet another cigarette, "we are bankrupt. We just don't know it yet."

He became president of Itochu in 1998, at the age of 61. At the time, Itochu was suffering significant losses from the collapse of the Japanese asset price bubble. At that point the company was doing rather poorly, with many of its subsidiaries having run deficits for years. Niwa's first action was to cut executive salaries by 30 to 50 percent.

This wasn't theater. Within weeks, Niwa did something unprecedented in Japanese corporate history—he stopped taking a salary entirely. In addition to cutting back on executive frills, Niwa set an example for his company by giving up his own salary. By 2001 he had gone without pay for 18 months, vowing that he would not accept any money from Itochu until its financial situation had improved. In January 2001, however, the company finally turned a profit and Niwa once again drew his salary.

"As the leader of the Itochu group with some 1000 companies, I wanted to show that corporate executives should always be first to put their own performance under the microscope and discipline themselves," Niwa said. Forgoing his pay was a radical act, but it showed a dedication to the company that few executives would have been willing to imitate.

But symbolic gestures wouldn't save Itochu. The company needed surgery, and Niwa wielded the scalpel with ruthless precision. Niwa cut 300 unprofitable businesses and held an initial public offering of Itochu's IT subsidiary Itochu Techno-Solutions in order to raise cash. The IPO was brilliant timing—Itochu also spun off CTC in 1999, only to see CTC quickly achieve a market capitalization more than twice that of its former parent company.

The real revolution came with Global-2000, Niwa's restructuring plan that read like a declaration of war on traditional Japanese business. Under the leadership of President and CEO Uichiro Niwa, ITOCHU in April 1999 initiated a two-year strategic plan called Global-2000. He was preparing the company, he told the Financial Times, to become a holding company by April 2001. Niwa also made plans to cut the number of directors from 45 to between 10 and 15 by 2000.

Think about that—from 45 directors to 10. In Japan, where corporate boards were retirement homes for loyal salarymen, this was heresy. The headquarters staff would be slashed from 280 to 100. Entire divisions would be eliminated. Sacred cows would be slaughtered.

In 1999, Itochu became one of the first Japanese companies to move away from the traditional seniority-based pay scale, adopting a base pay scale based on responsibilities, impact and value of each position as well as a performance-linked bonus system. This wasn't just reform—it was revolution. In a country where lifetime employment and seniority-based promotion were articles of faith, Itochu was saying: perform or perish.

The losses for fiscal 1999 told the story: ¥34.09 billion (US$283 million), but the company did not pay a dividend for the first time in 50 years. For a Japanese blue-chip, not paying a dividend was like admitting defeat. But Niwa didn't care about face—he cared about survival.

Meanwhile, competitors watched in horror and fascination. By this time, ITOCHU had fallen to the number three position among sogo shosha, having been surpassed by Mitsui and Mitsubishi. The company that had briefly been Japan's largest trading house in the early 1990s was now fighting for relevance.

But here's what the numbers didn't show: Niwa was fundamentally reimagining what a trading company could be. He established a team called "Net Valley" to grow Itochu's investments in the internet, satellite and broadcasting industries. While Mitsubishi doubled down on resources and Mitsui on heavy industry, Niwa was betting on bits instead of barrels.

In 1999 Niwa accelerated his plans to reduce the company's interest-bearing debts. He cut the number of Itochu board members and focused on a select few of Itochu's core businesses, including information services, clothing, retail financing, oil and gas, engineering, and food resource development.

The focus on "a select few" was crucial. For decades, sogo shosha had operated on the principle of being everywhere, doing everything. Niwa's radical idea? Do less, but do it better. Focus on areas where Itochu had genuine competitive advantages—textiles, food, consumer goods, China relationships—rather than trying to out-muscle Mitsubishi in mining.

Then came the final reckoning. In October 1999, Niwa announced another massive writeoff: ¥253 billion (US$2.38 billion)—this one concentrating on real estate projects. The total cleanup bill was approaching $5 billion—money that Itochu, unlike its zaibatsu rivals, simply didn't have.

The increased emphasis on profitability was a major shift for a trading company as the sogo shosha had traditionally valued market share and sales growth ahead of returns on investments. This was the heart of Niwa's revolution—in an industry obsessed with size, he chose profitability. In a culture that valued consensus, he chose speed. In a company that had always looked inward, he looked to China.

The China bet was particularly prescient. In the early 2000s Japanese companies had come to fear China as an unbeatable competitor in production and exports. Such companies as Sony, however, began moving into China and developing their products there, having decided to benefit from the country's lower costs rather than avoiding competition with Chinese industries. Itochu itself worked with Japan's Ito-Yokado Company in 2001 to open a department store in Beijing at the Asian Games Village, which had already been constructed in preparation for the 2008 Olympics.

As the new millennium dawned, Itochu had been gutted and rebuilt. The company was smaller, leaner, more focused. Revenue was down, but profitability was finally improving. The dividend drought ended in 2001 when the company finally returned to profit.

But Niwa had done something more important than fix the balance sheet—he had broken the spell of Japanese corporate conformity. He had shown that a trading company didn't need to follow the zaibatsu playbook. That being smaller could mean being smarter. That in a world of global supply chains and digital commerce, relationships and information mattered more than owning mines and factories.

The stage was set for the next act. All Itochu needed was a leader crazy enough to take Niwa's revolution to its logical conclusion. They found him in the most unlikely place—running the textile division, the same division where Chubei Itoh had started selling linen door-to-door 150 years earlier.

↑ Back to Top

V. The Okafuji Revolution: Culture and Strategy Transformation (2010-2015)

Tokyo, 8 PM, February 2013. The fluorescent lights in Itochu's headquarters suddenly went dark. Not a power failure—a revolution. Security guards began walking the floors, politely but firmly telling employees to go home. In the land of karoshi—death from overwork—Itochu was committing corporate heresy.

Standing in his now-dark office was Masahiro Okafuji, chief executive officer and president of Itochu Corporation, a role he has held since April 2010. A chain smoker like his predecessor Niwa, but with a different kind of fire burning inside. Where Niwa had been a surgeon, cutting away dead tissue, Okafuji was an architect, redesigning the entire structure.

Masahiro Okafuji became president of Itochu in 2010 and announced a strategy to make Itochu the first-ranked sogo shosha in areas other than raw resources, particularly in food products and machinery. This wasn't just ambition—it was a declaration of war on the traditional trading house model. While Mitsubishi and Mitsui were digging deeper into Australian coal mines and Brazilian iron ore, Okafuji was looking at convenience stores and fashion brands.

But the real revolution started with something seemingly trivial: when people worked. In 2013, Itochu implemented a general ban on work after 8 PM with an across-the-board "lights out" policy at 10 PM while encouraging that any necessary overtime be taken in the early morning hours, reducing the total amount of overtime across the company.

His unconventional approach involved banning office work after 8 pm and significantly reducing overtime, except in rare cases. Security guards and human resources staff were tasked with ensuring employees left the office on time, with those remaining asked to come in early the next day to complete their tasks and receive extra compensation.

The pushback was immediate and fierce. Middle managers complained it was impossible. Clients would be furious. Competitors would eat their lunch. This was Japan, where staying late wasn't just about work—it was about showing loyalty, dedication, face.

Okafuji didn't care. He had started his career in 1974 in the textile division—the same division where Chubei Itoh had started—and worked his way up through the unglamorous parts of the business. A graduate of Tokyo University, Okafuji first joined the Japanese trading company in 1974. By 2004, he was moving up the corporate ladder, becoming president of Itochu's textile division and managing director of Itochu Corp. In 2006, he became senior managing director, and three years later, he was promoted to the position of executive vice president.

He understood something his competitors didn't: in the 21st century, the competitive advantage wouldn't come from working harder—it would come from working smarter. And exhausted salarymen making decisions at midnight weren't smart.

The morning-focused system wasn't just about health—it was about strategy. ITOCHU Corporation today announced that on May 1, 2014 it will officially introduce a morning-focused working system in accordance with the labor-management agreement with the ITOCHU Labor Union dated April 21, 2014. This initiative was aimed at practicing an effective working style to reduce the total number of working hours. Specifically, the Company reviewed the work style that assumes overtime work and shifted from a night-focused style to morning-focused work centered on the basic hours of 9 a.m.

But the work reforms were just the visible part of a deeper transformation. Under Okafuji's leadership, Itochu rebalanced its portfolio and reduced its reliance on natural resource businesses, shifting towards consumer-oriented non-resource business. This wasn't incrementalism—it was a fundamental reimagining of what a trading company could be. The results were more profound than anyone imagined. The first measure for unique work-style reforms was to establish "I-Kids," which is a childcare center for employees, in January 2010. At the time, there were such social problems as rising numbers of children on waiting lists due to a shortage of certified daycare facilities. The company decided to open "I-Kids" next to Tokyo Headquarters, with the aim of removing barriers to continued employment and bolstering employee motivation to keep working after childbirth.

But something unexpected happened. The results were astounding, with Itochu witnessing a more than fivefold increase in profit per employee from 2010 to 2021. Even more remarkably, the fertility rate among full-time female employees nearly doubled, reaching almost two children per employee by March 2022, surpassing Japan's current national rate of about 1.3. In April, Itochu Corporation announced that the total fertility rate of its female employees, aged between 15 and 49, had risen to 1.97 in the 2021 fiscal year, which ended in March.

This wasn't just a statistical anomaly—it was proof that treating employees like humans rather than robots actually worked. In addition, the percentage of male employees married to working women had soared from 9% in 2000 to 43% in 2021; for men in their twenties and thirties, the latest figures were 90% and 63%, respectively. It was clear that attitudes toward work and gender were shifting dramatically, especially among younger employees.

The disclosure of fertility rates sparked controversy. Critics accused the company of overreach and worried that it was marginalizing women who could not or would not have children. But for Okafuji, this missed the point entirely. Until fairly recently, the workplace culture was such that a woman employee felt compelled to apologize to her superior for getting pregnant. When a company tells the world it's proud of its rising fertility rate, it means women don't have to apologize any more.

Meanwhile, the strategic transformation was accelerating. China is among one of the countries Okafuji has looked to for growth and profit. The company that had been recognized as a "friendly trading company" by China in 1972 was about to double down on that relationship in spectacular fashion.

The non-resource strategy was paying off spectacularly. While commodity prices began their long slide in 2014, Itochu's consumer-focused businesses kept growing. Fashion brands, convenience stores, food distribution—all the "unsexy" businesses that resource-focused competitors had ignored—were generating steady, predictable cash flows.

Under Okafuji's leadership, Itochu has led its way to be one of the most profitable sogo shosha. The numbers told the story: profit per employee increased fivefold. Female employees were having more children while advancing their careers. Male employees were going home to their families. And somehow, against all conventional wisdom, the company was making more money than ever.

But Okafuji wasn't done. The work-life revolution was just the foundation. The real transformation would come from a bet so large, so audacious, that it would either cement Itochu's position as Japan's leading trading house or destroy it entirely.

In 2014, Itochu entered into a cross-shareholding relationship with the Thai conglomerate Charoen Pokphand (CP) and agreed to invest over $8 billion in the Chinese state-owned CITIC Group in 2015, the largest investment ever made by a Japanese company in China.

The stage was set for the biggest gamble in Itochu's 156-year history. And unlike the lights at 8 PM, there would be no turning this one off.

↑ Back to Top

VI. The China Gambit: CITIC & CP Strategic Alliance (2014-2015)

Beijing, January 20, 2015. The Great Hall of the People. Three men stood at a podium that had witnessed the signing of countless treaties and proclamations. But this wasn't a government ceremony. This was business—the biggest business deal between Japan and China in history.

Japanese trading giant Itochu and Thailand's Charoen Pokphand Group (CP) are buying a 20 per cent stake in Citic, China's largest conglomerate, for HK$80.3 billion. The numbers were staggering: ITOCHU and the CP Group invested a combined total of about ¥1,200.0 billion in CITIC on a 50:50 basis. HK$80 billion (US$10.4 billion) in CITIC Limited, the largest investment ever made by a Japanese general trading company. The transaction is also the largest acquisition in China by a Japanese company, and the largest investment by foreigners in a Chinese state-owned enterprise.

Standing at the center was Masahiro Okafuji, chain-smoking even moments before the ceremony. To his left, Dhanin Chearavanont, Thailand's richest man and head of CP Group—a family whose roots traced back to southern China. To his right, Chang Zhenming, chairman of CITIC, China's oldest and most powerful state conglomerate.

The Western press didn't understand what they were witnessing. "From a concentration risk perspective, it appears to be high risk," said Nomura Securities analyst Yasuhiro Narita. "While Citic is a conglomerate, it deals with areas such as real estate and raw materials development which are facing deteriorating conditions, we need to note the possibility of future losses."

But this skepticism missed the point entirely. This wasn't just an investment—it was the culmination of relationships built over decades. The groundwork had been laid systematically. Today, subsequent to the approval of the board of directors dated July 24, 2014, ITOCHU Corporation has agreed and executed a Strategic Alliance Agreement with one of Asia's leading Agriculture-based conglomerate company Charoen Pokphand Group Company Limited, with the aim of deepening mutual cooperation and maximizing corporate value with their corporate group.

The CP alliance alone was massive: ITOCHU's investment of 25%(voting shares) in C.P. Pokphand Co. Ltd. ("CPP"), a subsidiary of Charoen Pokphand Foods Public Company Limited ("CPF"). CPP is engaged in feed, livestock and aqua product related business in China and Vietnam. The consideration for the investment is expected to be approximately 87 billion yen.

But the real magic was in how these three partners fit together. Both Itochu and CP Group already have deep relations with Citic entities and ties to the mainland. In 2011, Itochu invested about $100 million in a Hong Kong asset management arm of Citic Group. Meanwhile, Chearavanont has close ties to the mainland and, since China opened up the country in 1979, CP Group was the first foreign entity to invest in China and was involved in agricultural reform.

The structure of the deal was as complex as it was brilliant. The deal will take place in two stages, with Itochu and CP Group agreeing to buy nearly 2.5 billion shares in Citic for HK$34.4 billion in April this year, and a further 3.3 billion shares for HK$45.9 billion in October. Itochu and CP will acquire the Citic stake through a 50-50 joint venture, Chia Tai Bright Investment (CT Bright), at a price of HK$13.80 a share, a 3.6 per cent premium to Citic's closing price on Monday of HK$13.32. CT Bright will first buy 10 per cent of Citic from Citic Group for HK$34.4 billion. Several months later, Citic will issue 3.33 billion convertible preferred shares to CT Bright for HK$45.9 billion in cash.

What did Itochu get for its ¥600 billion? Access to something money usually can't buy in China—trust and information. Through the CITIC Group, which has a close relationship with the central government, ITOCHU now has access to real-time information that it was not able to obtain in the past. For example, we are now acquiring detailed information about such matters as the policy direction of the Chinese economy, human networks, and the potential of various projects.

CITIC wasn't just any Chinese company. CITIC Group Corporation Ltd., formerly the China International Trust Investment Corporation (CITIC), is a state-owned investment company of the People's Republic of China, established by Rong Yiren in 1979 with the approval of Deng Xiaoping. At the end of fiscal 2009, the consolidated total assets of the CITIC Group stood at 2.1538 trillion yuan, with consolidated net assets of 135.2 billion yuan and consolidated net profit of 18.9 billion yuan. This was China Inc. at its most powerful.

The skeptics focused on CITIC's troubled assets—its disastrous Australian iron ore project, its real estate exposure. Some analysts said the investment, which will likely require borrowing from banks, appeared risky for Itochu considering its market capitalisation was only slightly over 2 trillion yen. But Okafuji saw something different: a consumer goldmine waiting to be unlocked.

Financial Service Business accounts for 80% of CITIC's earnings. Through growth in non-finance businesses, centered on consumer-related businesses, ITOCHU can contribute to the reform of CITIC's earnings structure. This will have a major impact on the corporate value of the CITIC Group. Synergies can be created in an extremely wide range of fields, such as retail, processed foods, livestock, grains and other foods, brands and other apparel-related areas, communications, and medicine.

The strategic logic was impeccable. CITIC had the government relationships and domestic distribution. CP Group had agricultural supply chains across Southeast Asia and deep connections in rural China. Itochu had global brands, trading expertise, and consumer market knowledge. Together, they could feed, clothe, and serve a billion Chinese consumers.

"This investment is a continuation of our reform and globalisation that began last year when we transformed from Citic Pacific to Citic, a Hong Kong-listed company and the largest conglomerate in China," Citic chairman Chang Zhenming said. This wasn't just about money—it was about China opening its state champions to foreign capital and expertise.

For Okafuji, this was vindication of everything he believed. While competitors chased commodity super-cycles, he had bet on Asian consumers. While others feared China's slowdown, he saw opportunity in its transformation. The deal represented 30% of Itochu's market capitalization—a bet-the-company move that would either make Itochu the undisputed leader of Japanese trading houses or destroy it.

Itochu's Okafuji, asked about such risks, said the investment was long-term but that it could eventually sell its stake for a profit if needed. But this was Okafuji being diplomatic. He had no intention of selling. This was about building something that would last generations.

The immediate market reaction was brutal. Itochu's stock fell 10% in two days. Analysts published scathing reports. Competitors whispered about Okafuji's gambling addiction. But within the company, there was quiet confidence. They had done their homework. They understood what others didn't.

Together with the overseas Chinese network of the CP Group, the intangible competitive advantage obtained through this strategic business alliance and capital participation has advanced ITOCHU's China strategy to a new level. This wasn't just about financial returns—it was about positioning Itochu at the center of Asia's economic future.

The results would soon prove the skeptics wrong, but first, Itochu had to deal with a crisis closer to home—the battle for Japan's convenience store crown.

↑ Back to Top

VII. Domestic Consolidation: The FamilyMart Saga (2018-2021)

Tokyo, July 2020. The COVID-19 pandemic had emptied the streets, but inside FamilyMart's headquarters, a different kind of contagion was spreading—panic. Japan's second-largest convenience store chain was hemorrhaging money. Same-store sales had collapsed. Franchisees were revolting. And Itochu, which already owned 50.1% of the company, saw an opportunity.

The tender offer announcement came like a thief in the night: ¥2,300 per share for the remaining shares of FamilyMart, valuing the entire company at approximately ¥580 billion. For Okafuji, this was the final piece of his domestic consolidation strategy. Control FamilyMart, and you controlled 16,500 stores across Japan—a distribution network that touched every corner of the country.

But this wasn't going to be the smooth corporate raid Itochu expected. U.S. activist investor RMB Capital had petitioned for a higher price, calling the offer "significantly unfair." Hong Kong based Oasis Management had also filed a petition saying it was made at a "significant discount."

The battle that followed would expose everything wrong with Japanese corporate governance—and inadvertently, everything right with Okafuji's long-term vision. The backstory was crucial. ITOCHU acquired roughly 30% of the issued shares of FamilyMart in 1998. Two major group businesses are FamilyMart, acquired from Seiyu in 1998. This wasn't a sudden raid—it was a twenty-year relationship reaching its logical conclusion.

The consolidation had been methodical. In August 2018, Itochu acquired 8.6% share of FamilyMart which is Japan's second largest convenience store chain behind 7-Eleven, through TOB, which made Itochu the 50.1% shareholder. Itochu participated in its equity earlier in 1998, and, after merging other competitors including CircleK, acquired further share to be a 95% shareholder in 2021.

The CircleK merger alone had been massive. Under the control of FamilyMart UNY Holdings, FamilyMart merged with Circle K Sunkus Co., Ltd., thereby forming a network of approximately 18,000 stores in Japan and growing to a scale that rivals the industry leader. But integration had been brutal—stores had different systems, different suppliers, different cultures.

Now, with COVID-19 providing cover, Itochu moved for total control. The takeover bid price is 2,300 yen per share as the trading house will pay a 31% premium over the closing price for the takeover. The total cost of the buyout is about 580 billion yen ($5.4 billion).

But the special committee established to protect minority shareholders saw things differently. In negotiation with Itochu, the special committee initially insisted that a tender offer price should be JPY 2,800 p/s, which was JPY 500 higher than the parent company's offer price. The committee also insisted that the price should not be below the lower limit of the DCF range (JPY 2,472) set by its own advisor and the scheme had to have an MoM (majority of minority shareholders) condition.

What happened next would become a case study in corporate governance failure. The independent committee was influenced by executives of Itochu and FamilyMart to give up its initial negotiation policy. Itochu's Chairman, both directly and indirectly, influenced the decision making of the related parties, including the independent committee members, with his refusal to raise the tender offer price above 2,300 yen per share. The FamilyMart's executive team (also ex-employees of Itochu) implied they could force the tender offer transaction without approval of the independent committee and pressured the independent committee members to provide a path to the tender offer.

The activists smelled blood. "The Tokyo High Court confirmed that the parent company (Itochu), through its controlled company (FamilyMart), did not meet the standard of fairness," said Seth Fischer, chief investment officer of Oasis. "Far too often, M&A transactions in Japan prioritize the interests of parent companies or majority shareholders at the expense of minority shareholders."

The court battles dragged on for years. The Tokyo District Court's March 23 ruling, which came after two years of investigations, said the offer price of ¥2,300 per share should have been 13% higher at ¥2,600, according to a court document reviewed by Bloomberg News. The high court said Itochu's tender offer was not conducted through generally accepted fair process because it failed to reflect the opinion from FamilyMart's independent committee that the price was not high enough.

It was a rare defeat for Itochu in Japanese courts. But Okafuji didn't seem bothered. He had gotten what he wanted—complete control of FamilyMart's 16,600 stores, 450 million monthly customer visits, and most importantly, their data.

The strategic logic was becoming clear. FamilyMart domestically operates approximately 16,600 stores, where total 450 million customers visit per month. This wasn't just about selling rice balls and coffee—it was about building a consumer data empire that could feed into every part of Itochu's business.

The integration plans were ambitious. ITOCHU Corporation announced today that ITOCHU and FamilyMart Co., Ltd. have agreed to establish a new company for in-store media business with digital signages. Digital advertising, data analytics, ecosystem plays with financial services—FamilyMart would become the physical manifestation of Itochu's digital transformation.

But the real value wasn't in the stores themselves—it was in what they represented: the last mile to Japanese consumers. While Amazon and Alibaba were building digital empires, Itochu was quietly assembling a physical network that touched every neighborhood in Japan. Combined with their food distribution through Nippon Access, their fashion brands, their financial services—FamilyMart was the glue that held the consumer ecosystem together.

The court ruling stung, but in the grand scheme, the extra ¥300 per share was a rounding error. Itochu had paid ¥580 billion for something priceless: a captive distribution network for everything from Australian beef to Chinese fashion to digital payments.

For Okafuji, this was vindication of his non-resource strategy. While competitors were writing down mining investments, he was building a consumer fortress. And the best part? The activists who fought him in court had inadvertently proven his point—FamilyMart was worth more than anyone realized.

The stage was set for the final act of Okafuji's transformation: proving that a trading company focused on consumers rather than commodities could become Japan's most valuable.

↑ Back to Top

VIII. Becoming #1: The Non-Resource Victory (2016-Present)

Tokyo Stock Exchange, March 31, 2016. The closing bell rang on a day that would rewrite Japanese corporate history. In March 2016, Itochu recorded JPY 352.2 bil in PAT in the fiscal year which ranked itself as the most profitable sogo shosha for its first time. The natural resources commodity price was decreased during the fiscal year ended in March 2016, which made its competitors Mitsubishi Corporation and Mitsui & Co Ltd fell in profits.

It was David slaying Goliath with a spreadsheet instead of a slingshot. Mitsubishi saw its first postwar net loss in the fiscal year ended March 2016, amid a slowdown in the Chinese economy and a slump in the commodity markets, causing Mitsubishi to lose its #1 position to Itochu.

The numbers were shocking. Mitsubishi, with its vast mining empire and 80,000 employees, had posted a loss. Mitsui, with 50-60% of profit coming from metals and energy (compared to Itochu with less than 30%), was hemorrhaging cash. Meanwhile, Itochu, the scrappy textile trader, was counting profits from convenience stores and Chinese consumers.

Okafuji lit another cigarette and smiled. Everything he had predicted was coming true. The commodity super-cycle was over. China was transitioning from an investment-driven economy to a consumption-driven one. And Itochu, perfectly positioned with its non-resource focus, was there to capture the shift.

The victory lap continued. In March 2021, Itochu ended its fiscal year by becoming the most profitable (recording JPY 401.4 bil in PAT) and the most valued (recording JPY 5,685 bil in market capitalization) sogo shosha in Japan. For a company that had nearly collapsed twenty years earlier, it was complete vindication.

But the real validation came from an unexpected source.

September 2020. The world was in lockdown, markets were in chaos, and an 90-year-old billionaire from Omaha was quietly buying shares on the Tokyo Stock Exchange. Buffett first unveiled the Japanese positions on his 90th birthday in August 2020 after making regular purchases on the Tokyo Stock Exchange, saying he was "confounded" by the opportunity and was attracted to the trading houses' dividend growth.

The "Oracle of Omaha" first acquired stakes in these firms in August 2020 for his 90th birthday, in an initial purchase worth roughly $6 billion. The firms are Mitsubishi Corp., Mitsui & Co., Itochu Corp., Marubeni and Sumitomo. The announcement sent shockwaves through Tokyo's financial district. Warren Buffett, who had historically avoided international investments, was suddenly betting billions on Japanese trading houses.

"I was confounded by the fact that we could buy into these companies," Buffett told CNBC's Becky Quick on "Squawk Box" in an interview from Tokyo on Wednesday. They had in effect "an earnings yield maybe 14% or something like that, but dividends would grow."

For Okafuji, this was the ultimate validation. The man who had built a career on finding value where others saw complexity had just endorsed Itochu's model. Buffett said, "Somewhat similar to Berkshire in that they owned lots of different interests."

But Buffett's investment wasn't just about the numbers—it was about the culture. "As the years have passed, our admiration for these companies has consistently grown. Greg [Abel, Buffett's designated successor] has met many times with them, and I regularly follow their progress. Both of us like their capital deployment, their managements and their attitude in respect to their investors. Each of the five companies increase dividends when appropriate, they repurchase their shares when it is sensible to do so, and their top managers are far less aggressive in their compensation programs than their U.S. counterparts."

The timing of Buffett's investment was particularly striking. While he was aggressively selling U.S. stocks and growing his record cash pile to $334 billion. Berkshire sold more than $134 billion worth of stocks in 2024, largely by shrinking the size of Berkshire's two largest equity holdings — Apple and Bank of America. In Japan, he was buying.

The structural advantage Buffett had discovered was brilliant in its simplicity. "Buffett is essentially borrowing money in Japan at a much lower interest rate than would be available in the U.S. and then taking the proceeds and investing them in Japanese equities. The key point is that he is exposed to the performance of the companies in the local market and pocketing the spread of the lower cost of borrowing in Japan."

Meanwhile, Itochu's domestic popularity was reaching new heights. The company that had nearly collapsed in the 1990s had become the third most popular employer among university and graduate students graduating in 2019, according to surveys, with general trading companies Mitsubishi Corporation, Mitsui & Co., and Itochu Corporation taking the top three spots.

The transformation was complete. From 2016 to 2021, Itochu had established itself as Japan's most profitable and most valuable sogo shosha. The non-resource strategy had proven prescient. The work-life reforms had created a competitive advantage in talent acquisition. The China bet through CITIC was paying dividends. The FamilyMart consolidation had created a consumer fortress.

By 2024, the validation continued to pour in. The 94-year-old investor's Berkshire Hathaway holding company raised its holdings in five Japanese trading houses — Itochu, Marubeni, Mitsubishi, Mitsui and Sumitomo — by more than 1 percentage point each, to stakes ranging from 8.5% to 9.8%, according to a regulatory filing. The "Oracle of Omaha" said in his 2024 annual letter that Berkshire is committed to its Japanese investments for the long term and has reached an agreement with the companies to go beyond an initial 10% ceiling.

At the end of 2024, the market value of Berkshire's Japanese holdings came to $23.5 billion, at an aggregate cost of $13.8 billion. The paper profit of nearly $10 billion was nice, but for Buffett, it was about more than money. He said he'd like Berkshire to own the companies forever.

Eight Division Company structure continued to evolve, with each division operating like an independent company: Textile Company, Machinery Company, Metals & Minerals Company, Energy & Chemicals Company, Food Company, General Products & Realty Company, ICT & Financial Business Company, and The 8th Company—a new division focused on customer contact points through FamilyMart.

Digital transformation initiatives accelerated. The company wasn't trying to become a tech company—it was using technology to enhance its traditional strengths. Data from FamilyMart's 450 million monthly customer visits fed into AI systems that optimized everything from inventory management to new product development.

Fiscal 2023 revenues reached approximately ¥11 trillion (about $82 billion), but more importantly, profit margins continued to expand. The company with 110,000 employees (including consolidated subsidiaries) was generating returns that competitors with twice the headcount couldn't match.

Recent moves showed Itochu wasn't resting on its laurels. The acquisition of automobile retailer Yanase, expansion into renewable energy, partnerships in digital health—each move reinforced the consumer-centric, non-resource strategy that had brought them to the top.

↑ Back to Top

IX. Playbook: The Itochu Way

The Itochu playbook reads like a contrarian's guide to Japanese business. Every rule that defined the traditional sogo shosha model, they broke. Every assumption about how to build a trading empire, they challenged.

Non-resource focus as competitive differentiation: While competitors fought over mining rights and oil fields, Itochu built positions in convenience stores, fashion brands, and food distribution. This wasn't just risk avoidance—it was recognizing that in the 21st century, proximity to consumers matters more than ownership of commodities. Resources are cyclical; people need to eat and shop every day.

Work culture as competitive advantage: The 8 PM lights-out policy wasn't corporate wellness theater—it was strategic genius. Fresh minds make better decisions. Employees with lives outside work are more creative. Families with two working parents and multiple children create more consumers. The fertility rate increase among female employees wasn't just a social good—it was proof that treating people well is good business.

"Sampo-yoshi" philosophy: The three-way satisfaction principle—good for seller, buyer, and society—sounds like corporate PR speak until you see it in action. The CITIC deal wasn't just about returns; it was about feeding Asian consumers. FamilyMart wasn't just about consolidation; it was about being the neighborhood store that knows your name. Every major decision filtered through this lens: does it create value for all stakeholders?

Strategic patience vs. opportunistic aggression: Itochu waited twenty years to fully consolidate FamilyMart. They spent decades building relationships in China before the CITIC investment. But when the moment came—commodity crash, pandemic disruption, market dislocation—they moved with stunning speed and scale. Patience in preparation, aggression in execution.

Cross-shareholding and alliance strategy: The CITIC-CP Group triangle wasn't just an investment—it was relationship architecture. Each party brought something the others needed: Itochu had global brands and trading expertise, CITIC had Chinese government relationships and domestic distribution, CP had agricultural supply chains and Southeast Asian networks. The sum was exponentially greater than the parts.

Downstream focus and consumer proximity: Every acquisition, every investment, every strategic move brought Itochu closer to the end consumer. While competitors focused on B2B relationships and industrial clients, Itochu built a B2C empire hidden inside a B2B company. They understood that in an age of disintermediation, the companies closest to consumers would capture the most value.

Managing conglomerate complexity through autonomy: The Division Company system wasn't just organizational structure—it was acknowledging that a company trading everything from bananas to insurance couldn't be centrally managed. Each division CEO ran their business like an entrepreneur, with full P&L responsibility. Corporate headquarters provided capital, connections, and coordination, but not commands.

The genius wasn't in any single element—it was in how they reinforced each other. Better work-life balance attracted better talent. Better talent made better decisions. Better decisions led to better returns. Better returns enabled more strategic flexibility. More flexibility allowed for contrarian bets. Contrarian bets that worked created a reputation for prescience. And that reputation attracted partners like Buffett who validated the entire strategy.

↑ Back to Top

X. Analysis & Investment Case

Bear case: The skeptics have legitimate concerns. The conglomerate discount is real—Itochu trades at a discount to the sum of its parts, as all sogo shosha do. China exposure through CITIC creates geopolitical risk that could explode without warning. The succession question looms large—Okafuji has been CEO since 2010 and chairman since 2018, and no successor has his combination of vision and authority. The non-resource focus that has been a strength could become a weakness if commodity super-cycles return.

The corporate governance issues exposed in the FamilyMart takeover remain troubling. The company's influence over supposedly independent committees, the lowball tender offer, the court rulings against them—all suggest that minority shareholders remain second-class citizens. For international investors accustomed to stronger governance standards, this is a red flag.

Regulatory risks are mounting. The Japanese government's increased scrutiny of convenience store labor practices, pressure on trading houses to support domestic agriculture, potential restrictions on China business—each creates uncertainty. The very success that made Itochu Japan's most profitable trading house also makes it a target for regulators and politicians.

Bull case: But the bulls have history on their side. Itochu has proven that a trading company can thrive without owning mines and oil fields. The consumer focus that seemed risky in 2010 now looks prescient. Asia's growing middle class needs food, clothing, and consumer goods—exactly what Itochu specializes in delivering.

The cultural moat is real and deepening. No competitor can replicate fifty years of China relationships overnight. The work-life balance that attracts Japan's best graduates can't be copied without fundamental cultural change. The ecosystem of 110,000 employees across hundreds of businesses creates information advantages that no algorithm can match.

Warren Buffett's validation isn't just celebrity endorsement—it's the world's greatest value investor saying Itochu is undervalued. His commitment to hold "forever" and increase stakes beyond 10% signals confidence that transcends quarterly earnings. When Buffett bets, smart money follows.

The financial metrics support the bull case. Trading at roughly 1x book value with ROE consistently above 15%, Itochu is cheap by global standards. The dividend yield approaching 3% with consistent buybacks provides downside protection. The ¥5+ trillion market cap still represents a discount to the value of its listed subsidiaries and investments.

Competitive positioning: Against other sogo shosha, Itochu has carved out a unique position. Mitsubishi has scale and resources. Mitsui has industrial depth. Sumitomo has financial services. Marubeni has infrastructure. But Itochu has consumers—and in a world where consumer data is the new oil, that might be the most valuable position of all.

ESG considerations: The company's environmental record is mixed—they're not in extractive industries, but they're not exactly green either. Social metrics are stronger, particularly around employee welfare and gender diversity. Governance remains the weak link, with minority shareholder rights and board independence lagging global standards.

Valuation analysis: At current levels, Itochu trades at a 30-40% discount to a sum-of-parts valuation. The stake in FamilyMart alone is worth ¥1 trillion. The CITIC investment has doubled in value. Listed subsidiaries and affiliates represent another ¥2-3 trillion. Add in the operating businesses, real estate, and working capital, and the intrinsic value approaches ¥8 trillion against a market cap of ¥5.5 trillion.

↑ Back to Top

XI. Epilogue & Future Scenarios

The succession question isn't just about replacing Okafuji—it's about whether anyone can maintain the delicate balance he created. The next CEO will need to be part merchant, part diplomat, part technologist, and part revolutionary. They'll need to navigate U.S.-China tensions while maintaining relationships with both. They'll need to digitize without losing the human touch. They'll need to grow without losing focus.

Digital transformation presents both opportunity and threat. Itochu's strength has always been relationships and information arbitrage. But in a world of blockchain, AI, and real-time data, what's the role of a trading house? The answer might be that technology makes the human elements—trust, judgment, relationships—even more valuable. Itochu isn't trying to become Amazon; it's trying to be the partner that helps brands succeed in Asia's complex markets.

Geopolitical risks are intensifying. Taiwan tensions, technology decoupling, supply chain nationalism—each threatens the pan-Asian integration that Itochu has built its strategy around. But crisis has always been Itochu's opportunity. They survived the Meiji Restoration, two world wars, and the bubble economy collapse. Adaptability is in their DNA.

The future of trading houses might not be trading at all. As direct-to-consumer brands bypass traditional distribution, as B2B marketplaces eliminate intermediaries, as blockchain enables trustless transactions, the traditional trading house model seems obsolete. But Itochu has already evolved beyond trading—they're consumer company that happens to trade, a data company that happens to own stores, a financial company that happens to move goods.

The key lessons for global business are profound. Culture beats strategy—but only if the culture is intentionally designed and fiercely protected. Being smaller can mean being smarter if you focus on what you do best. Relationships and trust remain valuable even—especially—in a digital world. And sometimes the best way to win is to play a different game entirely.

↑ Back to Top

XII. Recent News & Final Thoughts

The latest developments confirm Itochu's trajectory. Expansion into healthcare through hospital operations and medical device distribution. Partnerships with Silicon Valley startups to bring innovation to Japan. Investments in African agriculture to secure future food supplies. Each move extends the consumer-centric, non-resource strategy while opening new growth vectors.

The AI revolution presents unique opportunities. Itochu's treasure trove of consumer data, combined with their distribution networks and brand relationships, positions them to be the platform that connects global brands with Asian consumers in an AI-powered economy. They're not trying to build the next ChatGPT—they're building the infrastructure that will deliver AI's benefits to billions of Asian consumers.

As we look back on the transformation from textile trader to trading house titan, from near-bankruptcy to Buffett's endorsement, from conformist follower to contrarian leader, one thing becomes clear: Itochu's story isn't just about business success. It's about proving that in a world that rewards scale, focus can win. In an industry that glorifies workaholism, balance can triumph. In a country that values conformity, contrarianism can prevail.

The maverick trading house that defied gravity didn't just change its own trajectory—it redefined what a Japanese company could be. And in doing so, it offers a blueprint for any company, anywhere, trying to transform itself for the 21st century: treat your people well, stay close to your customers, be patient in preparation but bold in execution, and never forget that in business, as in life, the best strategy is often the one nobody else is following.

The linen peddler's legacy lives on, not in the textiles that built the company, but in the DNA that still drives it: find opportunity where others see chaos, treat people with dignity, and never stop walking toward the next door to knock on.