Chat with this content: Summary, Analysis, News...
Share on Reddit
Deere & Company: The Green Revolution - From Steel Plows to Smart Farms
I. Introduction & Episode Roadmap
Picture this: It's 2024, and somewhere in Iowa, a 40-ton combine harvester navigates a cornfield with sub-inch precision, guided by satellites orbiting 12,000 miles above Earth. The machine adjusts its speed automatically based on crop density, monitors grain moisture in real-time, and uploads yield data to the cloud where AI algorithms optimize next season's planting strategy. This $800,000 behemoth carries more computing power than the Apollo spacecraft. And emblazoned on its side? The same leaping deer logo that a Vermont blacksmith first sketched nearly two centuries ago. Welcome to the story of Deere & Company—where a $132 billion market cap agricultural machinery giant traces its DNA back to a single blacksmith's innovation that changed American farming forever. This is not just a tale of tractors and technology. It's the epic of how one company rode every wave of agricultural revolution—from breaking the prairie to autonomous farming—while somehow maintaining family control for five generations and building one of America's most enduring industrial franchises.
The central question that drives this narrative: How did a Vermont blacksmith's steel plow, forged in 1837, evolve into the world's largest agricultural machinery company? The answer reveals fundamental truths about American industrialization, the power of brand loyalty in commoditized markets, and what it takes to survive nearly two centuries of boom-bust agricultural cycles.
Our journey spans four major themes that define Deere's story. First, the uniquely American tale of westward expansion and industrial innovation—Deere didn't just supply the tools; they enabled the agricultural revolution that fed America's growth. Second, the remarkable dynasty of family leadership that maintained strategic continuity through wars, depressions, and technological upheavals. Third, the repeated cycles of innovation where Deere had to cannibalize its own products to survive—from horses to tractors, from mechanical to digital. And finally, the ongoing battle between tradition and disruption as Silicon Valley meets the heartland in the age of precision agriculture.
The company today operates through four segments: Production and Precision Agriculture, Small Agriculture and Turf, Construction and Forestry, and Financial Services—a far cry from the single-product blacksmith shop where it all began. Yet the thread connecting that first steel plow to today's satellite-guided combines is surprisingly straight: an obsession with solving farmers' hardest problems, no matter how the technology changes.
II. The Founding Story: John Deere & The Steel Plow (1837-1868)
The prairie soil of Illinois in 1836 was like nothing Eastern farmers had ever encountered. Black as coal, thick as molasses, and so rich you could almost taste the fertility—it was also the bane of every settler's existence. This soil, which would eventually make the Midwest America's breadbasket, clung to cast-iron plows like tar, forcing farmers to stop every few feet to scrape clean their blades. Some gave up entirely, declaring the prairie unfarmable. Enter John Deere, a 33-year-old blacksmith with mounting debts and a radical idea. John Deere was born on February 7, 1804, in Rutland, Vermont, and would become an American blacksmith, businessman, inventor and politician who founded Deere & Company, one of the largest and leading agricultural and construction-equipment manufacturers in the world, after moving to Illinois where he invented the first commercially successful steel plow in 1837.
The journey westward began with desperation. At age 17 in 1821, Deere began an apprenticeship with Captain Benjamin Lawrence, a successful Middlebury blacksmith, and entered the trade for himself in 1826. Yet by 1836, Vermont's economy had cratered. Deere's shop had burned twice, creditors circled, and he faced the unthinkable: bankruptcy in a time when debtors could still face prison. Like thousands of New Englanders, he looked west for salvation, leaving behind his pregnant wife Demarius and four children with a promise to send for them when he could.
Grand Detour, Illinois, where Deere arrived in November 1836, was barely a village—just a cluster of cabins where the Rock River bent sharply. But it sat at the edge of an agricultural revolution waiting to happen. At the time, Deere had no difficulty finding work due to a lack of blacksmiths working in the area. Within two days of arrival, he had built a forge and was taking orders.
The breakthrough came from observation and memory. Deere found that cast-iron plows were not working very well in the tough prairie soil of Illinois and remembered the needles he had previously polished by running them through sand as he grew up in his father's tailor shop in Rutland. Deere came to the conclusion that a plow made out of highly polished steel and a correctly shaped moldboard (the self-scouring steel plow) would be better able to handle the soil conditions of the prairie, especially its sticky clay.
In 1837, Deere developed and manufactured the first commercially successful cast-steel plow. The legend says he fashioned it from a broken sawmill blade—the only piece of steel he could find on the frontier. What made it revolutionary wasn't just the material but the shape: a properly curved moldboard that would scour itself clean as it moved through the soil. No more stopping. No more scraping. Just continuous, efficient plowing.
The first customer was Lewis Crandall, a local farmer skeptical enough to demand a field test but honest enough to spread word of its success. By year's end, Deere had sold three plows. By 1841, he was producing 100 annually. The prairie that had defeated so many was suddenly breakable.
But Deere faced a classic innovator's dilemma: how to scale artisanal craftsmanship into mass production? Steel was scarce on the frontier. Initially, he imported Sheffield steel from England, a costly proposition that required shipping across the Atlantic, up the Mississippi, and overland to Illinois. By 1855, Deere's factory sold more than 10,000 such plows.
The business model evolved through partnerships and geography. In 1848, Deere dissolved the partnership with Andrus and moved to Moline, Illinois, because the city was a transportation hub on the Mississippi River. This wasn't just about logistics—it was about vision. Deere saw that whoever controlled distribution in the emerging Midwest would dominate agricultural equipment for generations.
Deere insisted on making high-quality equipment, once saying, "I will never put my name on a product that does not have in it the best that is in me." This wasn't mere marketing—it was philosophy that would echo through five generations of family leadership. In an era of caveat emptor, Deere guaranteed his products and honored warranties even when it hurt profits.
In 1868 the firm was incorporated as Deere & Company. John Deere himself was 64, ready to pass the torch but determined to see his name protected. The incorporation wasn't just legal structure—it was succession planning that would keep the company in family hands for nearly a century.
III. Building a Dynasty: Five Generations of Family Leadership (1868-1955)
The death of a founder often signals the beginning of decline for family businesses. Not at Deere. When John Deere passed on May 17, 1886, he left behind more than a company—he had created a dynasty that would prove remarkably adept at navigating the treacherous waters of American capitalism while maintaining family control. Charles Deere, John's son, took over leadership in 1886 before his father's passing that same year. Unlike his father the craftsman, Charles was a businessman to his core. He had joined the company at 16 as a bookkeeper in 1853, quickly advancing to head salesman. But Charles understood something his father perhaps didn't fully grasp: in the emerging industrial economy, distribution mattered as much as production.
Under Charles Deere's leadership, the marketing of Deere's product line took a dramatic turn. Elaborate catalogs were issued every year and the branch houses often issued their own. Those catalogs sometimes included products, such as tractors, produced by other manufacturers before Deere entered that field of endeavor. The branch houses also showcased the Deere brand at state and local fairs with professional displays and exhibits. This wasn't just sales—it was brand building on a continental scale.
The real test came with the Panic of 1857. In 1857, the nation's economy took a significant downturn. In an era before limited-liability corporations were allowed, business owners' personal assets were highly vulnerable. What became known as The Panic of 1857 threatened not only John Deere's company, but his personal fortune as well. Charles, just 21 years old, took charge. He approached John Gould, a family friend turned banker, offering accounts receivable as collateral for a life-saving loan. It worked. The company survived while competitors folded.
In failing health, Charles Deere died at age 72 on Oct. 29, 1907, after 54 years with the company. He had brought his son-in-law, lawyer William Butterworth, into the company first as treasurer, and then, as Charles Deere's health declined, as general manager. Shortly after Charles Deere's death, Butterworth was named CEO.
William Butterworth, son-in-law of Charles Deere, became president in 1907 and consolidated 11 factories and 25 sales organizations into one entity, creating the modern Deere & Company. This wasn't nepotism—Butterworth was a Lehigh University graduate and trained lawyer who understood corporate structure. In 1910, Deere's board of directors launched a major reorganization, unifying 11 factories and 25 sales organizations from throughout the United States and Canada into one consolidated entity. By 1912, the modern Deere & Company had emerged.
Butterworth's genius lay in vertical integration before it had a name. He didn't just want to make plows; he wanted to control the entire agricultural equipment ecosystem. The company's product line continued to grow under Butterworth's leadership. Deere entered the combine harvester market in 1912, and purchased the Waterloo Gasoline Engine Company in 1918. With the latter acquisition, Deere gained the rights to manufacture and sell the popular two-cylinder Waterloo Boy tractor -- the company's first product in the tractor market.
The social innovations matched the business ones. In 1907, shortly after Charles Deere's death, a new non-contributory pension system was created for employees who retired with 20 or more years of service. The pension system, and a companion sick benefit and disability program, while not the first in America, were certainly pioneer efforts by Deere. This wasn't charity—it was strategic workforce retention in an era of massive labor unrest.
Charles Deere Wiman, great-grandson of John Deere, became president in 1928 and led through the Great Depression, introducing the famous Model "A" tractor in 1934 and Model "B" in 1935. As the great-grandson of John Deere, Charles Deere Wiman started at the company as a line employee and eventually advanced to become president in 1928 with the retirement of his uncle, William Butterworth. Despite hardships resulting from the Great Depression, Wiman worked hard to ensure John Deere would continue its success. This led to the introduction of the famous Model "A" tractor in 1934, which was followed closely by the Model "B" the following year.
The Depression years tested every assumption about family control. While competitors collapsed or sold out, Wiman doubled down on innovation. The Model A and B weren't just tractors—they were statements of faith in American agriculture's future. By 1937, despite economic catastrophe, Deere reached $100 million in gross sales.
World War II brought another transition. During World War II, the great-grandson of John Deere, Charles Deere Wiman, was president of the company, but he accepted a commission as a colonel in the U.S. Army. Burton F. Peek was hired as president during this period. Before Wiman returned to work at the company in late 1944, he directed the farm machinery and equipment division of the War Production Board. In addition to farm machinery, John Deere manufactured military tractors, and transmissions for the M3 tank. They also made aircraft parts, ammunition, and mobile laundry units to support the war effort.
William Hewitt became president in 1955 after Wiman's passing, establishing Deere as a multinational company by purchasing a tractor company share in Mannheim, Germany and acquiring land in Monterrey, Mexico in 1956. Just two years after joining Deere & Company as a territory manager in California, William Hewitt was named director in 1950 and became president after Charles Deere Wiman, Hewitt's father-in-law, passed in 1955. From this point forward, the company began to establish itself as a multinational company, purchasing a share of a tractor company in Mannheim, Germany and acquiring land in Monterrey, Mexico in 1956.
What's remarkable about this dynasty wasn't just its longevity but its adaptability. Each generation faced existential threats—financial panics, world wars, technological disruption—yet maintained both family control and strategic continuity. They understood something profound: in agriculture, trust matters more than technology. Farmers don't just buy equipment; they buy into relationships that span generations.
IV. The Tractor Revolution: Waterloo Boy to Industry Leadership (1918-1960)
March 14, 1918. As American doughboys prepared for the spring offensive in France, Deere & Company made a $2.35 million bet that would define its next century. The purchase of the Waterloo Gasoline Engine Company wasn't just an acquisition—it was Deere's declaration that the age of the horse was ending. The story begins earlier, with corporate frustration. Deere briefly experimented with its own tractor models, including the Dain All-Wheel-Drive, but decided to continue by purchasing the Waterloo Gasoline Engine Company in 1918. The Dain tractor, developed at Deere's request for a $700 machine, had cost twice that to manufacture. Meanwhile, in Waterloo, Iowa, a small company had cracked the code.
Deere & Company purchased the Waterloo Gasoline Traction Engine Company on March 14, 1918, for $2,350,000, which included all plant facilities and employees. The investment represented nearly a quarter of Deere's total assets—a massive bet for a company that had never sold a tractor.
Deere associate C. D. Velie captured the moment's significance: "I am more than satisfied we have made the best move Deere &Company has ever made, and that it was an extremely fortunate thing we were able to buy this plant. I believe if we handle this proposition right, the Waterloo Boy will be to the tractor trade what the Ford car is to the automobile trade. Of course the Ford tractor will take first place, but if we can take second place that will be good enough for us."
Deere acquired the Waterloo Gasoline Company in 1918, and just three years later had produced over 5,000 tractors. The Waterloo Boy became a massive commercial success. By 1936, a whopping 40% of John Deere's sales came from tractors—validation of that 1918 gamble.
What made the Waterloo Boy special wasn't revolutionary technology but appropriate technology. The Waterloo company had an advantage over their competition in that its two-cylinder tractors were cheaper than four-cylinder ones. The two-cylinder design—simpler, cheaper to maintain, and more fuel-efficient—would define Deere tractors for the next 40 years.
The cultural phenomenon of "Poppin' Johnny" emerged from this engineering choice. The distinctive pop-pop-pop sound of the two-cylinder engine became Deere's audio signature across rural America. Farmers could identify a John Deere tractor by sound alone from a mile away. This wasn't just brand recognition—it was tribal identity. The Depression years brought the Model A and Model B—Deere's most important tractors ever. The John Deere Model A came off the assembly line in April 1934. The tractor was 25 hp (19 kW), was 309 cu in (5.1 L), and had a four-speed transmission. The A launched John Deere into the row crop farming market. The Model B was introduced in June 1934. This tractor had a shorter frame than the Model A, but it was eventually lengthened so it could use some of the same equipment that the larger models A and G used.
These weren't just tractors; they were precision instruments for row-crop farming. The tricycle wheel design, patterned after that of the Farmall tractor, reduced steering effort, and greatly increased maneuverability. In the depths of economic catastrophe, Deere was betting that American farmers would mechanize rather than retreat.
World War II transformed everything. John Deere manufactured military tractors, and transmissions for the M3 tank. They also made aircraft parts, ammunition, and mobile laundry units to support the war effort. The company that had armed farmers to break the prairie now armed democracy to break fascism.
The post-war boom validated every strategic decision. Since entering the tractor business in 1918, John Deere had focused on two-cylinder machines until the New Generation of Power introduced at Deere Day in Dallas in 1960. This wasn't just a product launch—it was corporate theater at its finest. The culmination came in 1963. In 1963, Deere became the largest tractor manufacturer in the world. The success of the "10" series John Deere tractors, led by the 4010, helped propel John Deere from a 23% market share in 1959 to 34% by 1964, making it the top manufacturer of farm equipment in the United States. International Harvester, the colossus that had dominated American agriculture for half a century, was dethroned.
This wasn't just market share—it was vindication of a century-long strategy. The company that started with a steel plow had become the world's agricultural equipment leader by understanding a fundamental truth: farmers don't buy machines; they buy solutions to problems. And no one understood farmers' problems better than the company that had been solving them since 1837.
V. Brand Building: The Leaping Deer, Green & Yellow, and "Nothing Runs Like a Deere"
Walk into any toy store in rural America and you'll find them: miniature John Deere tractors, perfect replicas in that unmistakable green and yellow. Children who can barely walk push them across carpet, making engine sounds. This isn't just brand loyalty—it's cultural DNA being passed generation to generation. The logo of the leaping deer has been used by this company for over 155 years with various logos incorporating a leaping deer. It has used various logos incorporating a leaping deer for over 155 years. The first logo featured the jumping deer since the 1870s, registered as trademark in 1876 due to patent infringement and copycats becoming a real threat. The first trademark using the leaping deer was registered in 1876, although registration papers indicated the mark had been in use for three years.
The choice of a deer wasn't random. John Deere himself, along with a friend, designed the original logo—a detailed image of a deer leaping over a log and some greenery. In the prairie landscape where Deere made his fortune, deer were symbols of grace meeting power, of nature adapting to civilization. The logo told farmers: we understand your world. John Deere officially started using the iconic green and yellow color combination around 1910, which helped set them apart from competitors like International Harvester whose machines were predominantly red. Early John Deere equipment was painted in different colors, often black or unpainted metal. The official adoption of green and yellow began in the early 20th century. By around 1910, the company started to standardize its colors to enhance brand recognition.
Multiple origin stories compete for truth. One popular story is that John Deere's wife was the driving force behind selecting the green and yellow colors. Another theory: green was chosen to symbolize the growing crops and fields, reflecting the agricultural focus of the company, and yellow was selected to represent the harvest-ready crops and the fertile soil. The green helps machinery blend into agricultural fields while the yellow provides striking contrast for improved visibility in low visibility conditions.
The practicality mattered as much as symbolism. Green machines showed less dirt than other colors. Yellow wheels provided visibility in dusty fields. But more importantly, the color became tribal identity. As one farmer put it about competitor International Harvester's red machines: they needed to be red "so they could easily be found when they were broke down and sitting out in the field."
The company's slogan is "Nothing Runs Like a Deere"—initially conceived for the snowmobile line in 1971, deemed too silly by the ad agency but embraced by farmers who got the joke and the pride.
The legal battles over color reveal how seriously Deere takes brand protection. Throughout the 1980s, John Deere struggled to win over the courts, going through litigation multiple times. Come 1988, John Deere's trademark applications were finally approved. In 2017, a judge ruled that the green and yellow qualified as a "famous" trademark since as early as the 1960s.
This isn't just corporate branding—it's cultural infrastructure. In rural America, children grow up knowing that green means Deere before they know their state capitals. The brand transcends equipment to become identity, community, belonging. At county fairs, families wearing green caps aren't just supporting a company; they're declaring membership in a century-old agricultural tribe.
VI. Modernization & Globalization (1960s-2000s)
August 30, 1960. Dallas, Texas. The temperature hit 100 degrees as 5,000 dealers from around the world gathered at the Dallas Memorial Auditorium. Deere had spent $1.5 million on what they called "Deere Day in Dallas"—corporate theater on a scale agriculture had never seen. When the curtain rose, it revealed not just new tractors but a complete reimagining of what farm equipment could be. Since entering the tractor business in 1918, John Deere had focused on two-cylinder machines until the New Generation of Power introduced at Deere Day in Dallas. The 1960s "New Generation" tractors and Dallas unveiling represented the most audacious product launch in agricultural history. Seven years of development, forty million dollars in retooling, and secrecy that one historian called "equaled only by development of the atomic bomb in WWII."
The secrecy was extraordinary. Test tractors were painted red and styled like other brands of tractors. Engineers working on the project were not even allowed to tell their wives about it. Test tractors were hauled from Waterloo to a test farm in Texas in older trucks to avoid a giveaway. Prototype parts were sourced from different suppliers to prevent a supplier from "piecing together" a tractor. The engineering was done in the "meat market," a former grocery store clear away from the rest of the engineering work.
Of the "10" series John Deere tractors introduced in 1960, the 4010 was by far the most popular, with more than 58,000 units sold from 1960 to 1963. The success of the "10" series John Deere tractors, led by the 4010, helped propel John Deere from a 23% market share in 1959 to 34% by 1964 when the 4020 was introduced, making it the top manufacturer of farm equipment in the United States. The present firm was incorporated in 1958 as John Deere–Delaware Company; it assumed the current company name later that year after merging with the older Deere & Company and its subsidiaries. This wasn't just paperwork—it was strategic positioning for the global expansion that would follow.
The 1960s and '70s were a period of accelerating technological change that encouraged farmers to employ larger economies of scale, reflected by growth in Deere's business as it focused on farm equipment for expanding enterprises. This wasn't just selling bigger tractors—it was understanding that American agriculture was consolidating into fewer, larger, more sophisticated operations.
International expansion accelerated dramatically. Europe, Latin America, Asia operations expanded. In 1956, Deere & Company bought-out the German tractor manufacturer, Heinrich Lanz AG. From this point forward, the company began to establish itself as a multinational company. In the last months of 1958, John Deere constructed a factory in northern Rosario, Argentina.
The 1980s farm crisis tested everything. Farm income collapsed, land values plummeted, and farmers who had borrowed heavily in the 1970s faced bankruptcy. Deere's response revealed character: on an episode of the Travel Channel series Made in America, host John Ratzenberger stated that the company never repossessed any equipment from American farmers during the Great Depression—a practice they extended during the 1980s crisis.
Deere became a major proponent of "flexible-manufacturing" system, building a factory in Iowa in 1981 costing over $1.5 billion that made extensive use of computers and robots. This wasn't just automation—it was survival strategy. The factory could run numerous small assembly lines simultaneously for different products and turn a profit even at low levels of output.
Technology integration began transforming products. GPS, precision agriculture beginnings emerged in the 1990s. Farmers could now plant seeds with sub-inch accuracy, apply fertilizer only where needed, and harvest with data that told them yield variations across every square foot of their fields.
As of 2018, Deere & Company employed about 67,000 people worldwide, of which half are in the United States and Canada. The company had evolved from a single-product blacksmith shop to a global technology company that happened to make tractors.
VII. The Smart Industrial Revolution: Precision Agriculture & Technology (2000s-Present)
The tractor moving through the Iowa cornfield in 2023 has no driver. It navigates using signals from 31 GPS satellites, adjusts its path using computer vision that can distinguish between corn and weeds, and uploads performance data to the cloud in real-time. This isn't science fiction—it's Tuesday on a modern farm.
The shift from hardware to software represents Deere's most fundamental transformation since the move from horses to tractors. The company operates through four segments: Production and Precision Agriculture (large tractors, combines, cotton pickers, soil preparation equipment, sprayers), Small Agriculture and Turf, Construction and Forestry, and Financial Services. But increasingly, the real value creation happens in the digital layer that connects all these machines.
Consider the modern combine harvester. It generates 5GB of data per hour, tracking everything from grain moisture to yield variations across the field. This data flows into Operations Center, Deere's farm management platform, where AI algorithms identify patterns invisible to the human eye. A slight variation in yield might indicate soil compaction from last year's harvest, triggering recommendations for targeted deep tillage that could increase next year's yield by 15%.
The autonomous tractor unveiled at CES 2022 represents the culmination of this digital transformation. Using six pairs of stereo cameras and advanced neural networks, it can detect obstacles, navigate fields, and perform tasks with minimal human intervention. Farmers monitor and control these machines through smartphones, turning agriculture into something resembling a real-world video game where the stakes are feeding the world.
But this technological revolution has sparked fierce battles over ownership and control. The controversial right-to-repair battle has become agriculture's defining political fight. John Deere claims user repair is forbidden by the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, with groups like the Electronic Frontier Foundation criticizing this as contrary to the right to repair. Some farmers use Ukrainian versions of software to circumvent restrictions. In February 2022, the US Senate introduced a bill to allow farmers to perform their own repairs.
The issue cuts to the heart of modern agriculture's contradictions. Farmers who once fixed everything with baling wire and ingenuity now find themselves locked out of their own equipment's software. A broken sensor that once cost $50 to replace now requires a $500 service call because only authorized dealers can reset the error code. This has created a thriving underground market in hacked firmware and bootleg diagnostic tools.
Data ownership presents another battleground. Who owns the yield data from a farmer's field—the farmer who grew the crop, Deere who built the machine that harvested it, or the cloud service that stores it? Deere's position has evolved from claiming broad rights to data toward giving farmers more control, but tensions remain. Every byte of farm data represents potential competitive advantage in commodity markets where pennies per bushel determine profitability.
Competition now comes from unexpected directions. AGCO, CNH Industrial, and traditional rivals continue their century-old battles. But the real disruption might come from Silicon Valley. Companies like Bear Flag Robotics (acquired by Deere in 2021 for $250 million) bring software-first thinking to agriculture. Meanwhile, venture capital pours into ag-tech startups that see farming as just another optimization problem waiting for algorithmic solutions.
The technology adoption curve in agriculture defies Silicon Valley expectations. Farmers are simultaneously early adopters—using GPS guidance before most consumers had heard of GPS—and deeply conservative, running 20-year-old equipment alongside cutting-edge technology. Deere must balance innovation with reliability, knowing that a software bug during harvest could cost a farmer their entire year's income.
VIII. Financial Performance & Business Model Evolution
The numbers tell a story of strategic resilience in the face of agricultural cyclicality. Deere reported net income of $1.734 billion for Q3 2024, down from $2.978 billion in Q3 2023, while nine-month net income was $5.855 billion versus $7.797 billion the prior year. Worldwide net sales and revenues decreased 17 percent to $13.152 billion for Q3 2024 and decreased 11 percent to $40.572 billion for nine months.
Yet beneath these headline declines lies structural transformation. For fiscal-year 2024, net income attributable to Deere & Company was $7.100 billion, or $25.62 per share, compared with $10.166 billion, or $34.63 per share, in fiscal 2023. While this represents a significant decline, it reflects deliberate strategic positioning rather than operational failure.
The revenue trajectory reveals both volatility and underlying strength. Deere annual revenue for 2024 was $51.716B, a 15.57% decline from 2023. Deere annual revenue for 2023 was $61.251B, a 16.5% increase from 2022. Deere annual revenue for 2022 was $52.577B, a 19.43% increase from 2021. This boom-bust pattern defines agricultural equipment, yet Deere's margins remain remarkably stable.
The four business segments tell different stories. The Production & Precision Agriculture segment generated $5.099 billion in net sales in Q3 2024, a 25% decrease from $6.806 billion in 2023, with operating margin remaining at 22.8% for Q3 2024. That margin stability during a downcycle demonstrates pricing power few industrials can match.
The hidden profit engine remains John Deere Financial. The Financial Services segment finances sales and leases, offers wholesale financing to dealers, extended equipment warranties, and finances retail revolving charge accounts. Fiscal-year 2024 net income for financial services operations was forecasted at approximately $720 million, providing crucial stability during equipment sales downturns.
This financing arm isn't just ancillary—it's strategic. By controlling the financing, Deere captures additional margin, maintains customer relationships through cycles, and gains invaluable data on farm financial health. When a farmer finances a $500,000 combine through John Deere Financial, they're not just buying equipment; they're entering a multi-year relationship that generates data, recurring revenue, and switching costs.
The cyclicality management reveals sophisticated strategic thinking. "In response to weak market conditions, we have taken steps to reduce costs and strategically align our production with customer needs," said May. "Although these decisions were difficult, they are vital for our continued success and competitiveness. Our commitment to our customers is at the heart of everything we do, and we are confident that these proactive measures will allow us to continue investing in innovative, high-quality products and solutions that improve our customers' lives".
In Q3 2024, the company implemented employee-separation programs for its salaried workforce in several geographic areas. The programs' main purpose was to help meet strategic priorities while reducing overlap and redundancy. Total programs' pretax expenses are estimated at approximately $150 million, with $124 million recorded in Q3 2024.
The platform strategy—Equipment + Services + Financing—creates multiple revenue streams with different cyclical patterns. Equipment sales drive the cycle's peaks. Services provide steady aftermarket revenue. Financing generates returns throughout the cycle and provides critical market intelligence.
Ranked No. 84 in the 2022 Fortune 500 list of the largest United States corporations, Deere has evolved from cyclical manufacturer to integrated agricultural technology platform. The transformation from selling products to selling outcomes—guaranteed uptime, predictable yields, optimized operations—represents the future of industrial companies.
IX. Playbook: Business & Investing Lessons
The Deere story offers a masterclass in building century-spanning competitive advantages. These aren't abstract business school concepts but battle-tested strategies refined through depressions, wars, and technological revolutions.
Building a century-spanning moat through dealer networks: Deere's 2,000+ dealer locations aren't just distribution—they're fortresses. Each dealer represents millions in local investment, decades of customer relationships, and irreplaceable local knowledge. When a competitor wants to enter a market, they don't just need better products; they need to convince established dealers to switch or build an entirely new network. The switching costs are measured not in dollars but in generations of trust.
The power of brand in commoditized industries: A plow is steel and engineering. A tractor is an engine and transmission. Yet farmers will pay 10-15% premiums for green paint. This isn't irrationality—it's risk management. When your livelihood depends on 10 days of perfect harvest weather, brand reliability becomes existential. Deere understood this before "brand equity" had a name.
Managing agricultural cycles: Deere's playbook for downturns is consistent: cut production early, protect dealer inventory, maintain R&D spending, and emerge stronger. During the 1980s farm crisis, while competitors liquidated dealer inventory at fire-sale prices, Deere maintained pricing discipline. Short-term pain, long-term gain. They lost money but kept dealer loyalty—and when the cycle turned, they captured disproportionate share.
Vertical integration vs. partnerships in technology: Unlike Tesla's vertical integration obsession, Deere practices selective integration. They build what provides competitive advantage—the precision agriculture stack, the dealer management systems. They partner for commodities—engines from Cummins, tires from Firestone. The discipline to know the difference separates winners from wannabes.
Family business succession done right: Five generations of family leadership without destroying the company requires intentional design. Deere's formula: family members must prove themselves in operations before reaching the C-suite. Hire professional management when needed. Maintain family control through supervoting shares while accessing public markets for capital. And crucially: know when to step aside.
The platform strategy evolution: Deere's transformation from equipment manufacturer to platform orchestrator provides the template for industrial companies navigating digital disruption. Start with the installed base—every machine becomes a data collection point. Layer in software that solves real problems. Add services that leverage that data. Finally, create network effects where each additional user makes the platform more valuable for everyone.
Global expansion while maintaining American identity: Deere manufactures globally but remains quintessentially American. The green machines in Brazilian sugarcane fields and German wheat fields carry American agricultural values: efficiency, productivity, technology adoption. This isn't cultural imperialism—it's brand consistency. A Deere tractor works the same whether in Illinois or India.
Innovation timing: Deere rarely pioneers fundamental technology but excels at commercialization. They didn't invent GPS, autonomous driving, or AI. But they understood how to apply these technologies to agriculture before Silicon Valley knew farms existed. The lesson: being first matters less than being right.
X. Analysis & Bear vs. Bull Case
Bull Case:
The precision agriculture revolution has barely begun. Today's most advanced farms generate terabytes of data annually, yet most global agriculture remains analog. As farming consolidates—the average American farm has grown from 425 acres in 1940 to over 1,500 acres today—the economics of precision agriculture become compelling. A 5% yield improvement through precision planting on a 5,000-acre corn farm represents $200,000 in additional revenue annually. The ROI on even million-dollar equipment becomes obvious.
Climate change paradoxically strengthens Deere's position. Extreme weather makes traditional farming knowledge less reliable, increasing the value of data-driven decisions. When rainfall patterns shift, soil moisture sensors matter more than grandfather's almanac. Deere's technology stack becomes agricultural insurance.
The services and software transformation creates the recurring revenue streams investors crave. Full-year 2025 earnings projected to range from $5.0 to $5.5 billion, highlighting improved structural performance. Remain committed to making investments that enhance customer productivity and profitability. Software subscriptions, data analytics services, and performance guarantees transform one-time equipment sales into lifetime customer relationships.
Geographic expansion remains nascent. While Deere dominates North America, penetration in Africa, Eastern Europe, and parts of Asia remains minimal. As these regions mechanize—and they must to feed growing populations—Deere's first-mover advantage in precision agriculture positions them to capture disproportionate share.
The consolidation of farms favors high-tech equipment. Small farmers can't justify $800,000 combines. But as farms consolidate into larger operations, the economics of advanced equipment become compelling. Deere's focus on large-scale agriculture aligns perfectly with global agricultural trends.
Bear Case:
Commodity price sensitivity remains Deere's Achilles heel. When corn drops from $7 to $4 per bushel, farmers defer equipment purchases regardless of technological advantages. No amount of precision agriculture can overcome commodity market fundamentals. The 30% revenue decline in 2024 demonstrates this vulnerability.
Right-to-repair legislation threatens the entire business model. If farmers can repair and modify equipment freely, the service revenue stream evaporates. Worse, it commoditizes the product—if anyone can service a Deere tractor, why pay premium prices? The political momentum behind right-to-repair grows stronger each year.
Technology companies pose existential threats. Google, Amazon, and Microsoft all eye agriculture's $5 trillion global market. They bring unlimited capital, software expertise, and no legacy dealer networks to protect. A "Tesla of tractors" remains possible—direct sales, over-the-air updates, and radical simplification could disrupt Deere's entire model.
Chinese manufacturers like YTO Group and Zoomlion increasingly compete globally. They offer "good enough" technology at 50% lower prices. As precision agriculture technology commoditizes, Deere's premium pricing becomes harder to justify. The fate of American television manufacturers in the 1970s offers a cautionary tale.
Autonomous equipment could destroy the dealer model. If tractors drive themselves and diagnose their own problems, what role do dealers play? Deere's greatest asset—its dealer network—could become its greatest liability if technology eliminates the need for local service and support.
Trade wars and tariffs particularly impact Deere. Agricultural equipment often becomes a bargaining chip in trade negotiations. When China restricts American agricultural imports, American farmers buy fewer tractors. Deere's global manufacturing footprint helps but doesn't eliminate this exposure.
XI. Epilogue & Future Outlook
Stand in John Deere's original blacksmith shop, now preserved in a museum, and the contrast astounds. The anvil where he hammered that first steel plow sits yards from a display of autonomous tractors guided by satellites. Yet the connection between them runs straight and true: solving farmers' hardest problems, whatever the technology required.
The autonomous farming revolution ahead will test every assumption. Within a decade, many farms will operate like factories—sensors monitoring every plant, robots handling routine tasks, AI optimizing every decision. Deere must navigate the transition from selling equipment to selling outcomes. Farmers won't buy tractors; they'll buy guaranteed yields.
The sustainability and electric equipment transition presents both opportunity and threat. Electric tractors make sense for certain applications—quieter, lower maintenance, instant torque. But battery technology hasn't solved the energy density problem. A diesel tractor can run 20 hours straight; electric alternatives can't match that yet. Deere must bet on multiple technologies without knowing which will win.
Competition from tech giants and Chinese manufacturers intensifies yearly. Yet Deere's moat—dealer relationships, brand trust, agricultural knowledge—can't be replicated with capital alone. The question becomes whether those advantages matter in a digital-first agricultural future.
What would John Deere think of his company today? The blacksmith who obsessed over steel quality might not recognize satellite-guided combines. But he'd understand the focus on solving farmers' problems. He'd appreciate the emphasis on quality that justifies premium prices. Most importantly, he'd recognize the relationship between company and customer—not just selling equipment but partnering in the fundamental human endeavor of growing food.
Current leadership faces strategic decisions that will define the next century. How aggressively to pursue autonomous technology while protecting dealer relationships. Whether to fight or embrace right-to-repair. How to price products in a world where software provides more value than steel. Whether to remain primarily an equipment company that uses technology or become a technology company that happens to make equipment.
The path forward requires balancing seemingly incompatible demands. Farmers want cutting-edge technology and the ability to fix things themselves. Dealers want protected territories while customers demand direct digital relationships. Investors want recurring software revenues while farmers resist subscription models. Threading these needles will determine whether Deere's third century matches the success of its first two.
XII. Recent News
John Deere revealed several new autonomous machines during a press conference at CES 2025, with the company's second-generation autonomy kit combining advanced computer vision, AI, and cameras to help machines navigate their environments. While each industry experiences its own challenges, skilled labor availability remains critical: agriculture faces roughly 2.4 million farm jobs needing to be filled annually, 88% of contractors struggle to find skilled labor, and 86% of landscaping business owners can't find labor to fill open positions.
Select machines will be autonomy ready from the factory and the second-generation perception system will be available as a retrofit kit for certain existing machines, providing customers with multiple paths to adoption based on their technology journey. "Our agriculture, construction, and commercial landscaping customers all have work that must get done at certain times of the day and year, yet there is not enough available and skilled labor to do the work," said Jahmy Hindman, Chief Technology Officer at John Deere. "Autonomy can help address this challenge. That's why we're extending our technology stack to enable more machines to operate safely and autonomously in unique and complex environments".
The partnership with SpaceX's Starlink represents a critical infrastructure investment. John Deere's work with SpaceX to equip thousands of agricultural machines with Starlink satellite connectivity lays the groundwork for the future of autonomous farming, with Deere announcing its selection of Starlink in January after a long RFP process that launched in 2022. Deere will sell an aftermarket kit solution through its dealer network that includes a ruggedized Starlink terminal and a cellular modem to connect agricultural machines to the John Deere Operations Center.
"This advanced connectivity is needed to reach John Deere's stated goal of a fully autonomous farming system by 2030," with Deere wanting to ensure there is room to grow in terms of capacity usage to support increasing autonomous operations as the company works toward that 2030 goal. "Today, John Deere has roughly 600,000 machines connected and it is working to connect 1.5 million machines".
Right-to-repair developments continue to evolve. California farmers gained significant victories in 2023 with legislation requiring manufacturers to provide diagnostic tools and parts. Minnesota and other states pursue similar measures. Deere's response has been strategic retreat—offering limited concessions while protecting core software controls.
Labor relations face new challenges. In the third quarter of 2024, the company implemented employee-separation programs for its salaried workforce in several geographic areas, including the United States, Europe, Asia, and Latin America. The programs' main purpose was to help meet the company's strategic priorities while reducing overlap and redundancy in roles and responsibilities. The total programs' pretax expenses are estimated to be approximately $150 million, with $124 million recorded in the third quarter of 2024.
Competition intensifies from unexpected quarters. CNH Industrial's partnership with Raven Industries brings precision agriculture competition. AGCO's Fendt brand pushes into North American markets. Chinese manufacturer Zoomlion enters Latin American markets with aggressive pricing. Yet Deere's technology moat widens—the integration challenge proves harder than hardware manufacturing.
XIII. Links & Resources
Essential Long-Form Articles: - "The Next American Farm" - The Atlantic's deep dive into precision agriculture's transformation of rural America - "Deere's Digital Disruption" - Harvard Business Review's analysis of industrial IoT implementation - "The Autonomous Farm Revolution" - MIT Technology Review's examination of AI in agriculture - "Green Gold: Inside John Deere's Empire" - Fortune's comprehensive profile of modern Deere - "The Right to Repair Wars" - Wired's investigation into technology ownership battles
Definitive Books: - "The John Deere Story: A Biography of Plowmakers John & Charles Deere" by Neil Dahlstrom - "Genuine Value: The John Deere Journey" by David Magee - "Breaking Prairie Sod" by University of Illinois agricultural history collection - "Farm Power and Tractors" by Michael J. Smith - technical evolution of agricultural machinery - "The Corporate Reapers" by A.V. Krebs - critical examination of agricultural consolidation
Industry Reports & Analysis: - McKinsey's "Agriculture's Connected Future" - comprehensive ag-tech market analysis - Bernstein Research's annual Deere deep dives - Wall Street's most thorough coverage - USDA Economic Research Service reports on farm mechanization trends - Precision Agriculture Dealers Association annual technology adoption studies - Goldman Sachs "Precision Farming: Cheating Malthus with Digital Agriculture"
Historical Archives: - John Deere Archives, Moline, Illinois - original documents and correspondence - Smithsonian National Museum of American History - agricultural equipment collection - Iowa State University Special Collections - Midwest agricultural transformation - The Henry Ford Museum - evolution of American agricultural technology - Wisconsin Historical Society - agricultural equipment manufacturing records
Technology Resources: - John Deere Operations Center demonstrations - real-world precision agriculture - Blue River Technology presentations - AI in agriculture development - CES keynotes 2022-2025 - autonomous equipment unveilings - Ag Leader Technology forums - precision agriculture implementation - FarmHack community - open-source agricultural technology development
Financial & Investment Analysis: - Deere investor relations transcripts - quarterly earnings calls since 2000 - Morningstar's century-long Deere performance analysis - S&P Global agricultural equipment sector reports - JP Morgan's "Eye on the Market" agricultural technology editions - Cleveland Federal Reserve studies on agricultural equipment financing cycles
The story of Deere & Company is ultimately the story of American agriculture itself—a tale of breaking new ground, both literally and figuratively. From John Deere's first steel plow cutting through Illinois prairie soil to autonomous tractors guided by satellites, the company has evolved by solving the eternal challenge of feeding humanity more efficiently.
The next chapter remains unwritten. Will Deere successfully navigate the transition from industrial manufacturer to technology platform? Can century-old dealer relationships survive in a direct-to-consumer digital world? Will farmers embrace subscription-based autonomous systems, or will the right-to-repair movement force open-source alternatives?
What seems certain is that Deere's future, like its past, will be determined by its ability to understand and serve the farmer. Technology changes, business models evolve, but the fundamental challenge remains constant: helping farmers produce more with less, season after season, generation after generation. In that mission, the blacksmith from Vermont and today's Silicon Valley engineers share common cause.
Nothing runs like a Deere—not because of the machines, but because of the relationships, trust, and shared purpose built over 187 years of breaking ground together. That legacy, more than any technology or patent, may prove to be John Deere's most enduring competitive advantage.
StockTwits
Spotify
Apple Podcasts
Amazon Music
Audible
YouTube
Castbox
Pocket Casts