Chat with this content: Summary, Analysis, News...
Share on Reddit
Pernod Ricard: The Spirit of Conviviality
How Two French Anise Rivals Merged, Mastered the Art of Acquisition, and Built the World's Second-Largest Spirits Empire
I. Introduction: The Empire Built on Pastis and Patience
Picture this: a sun-drenched terrace in Provence, the Mediterranean breeze carrying the scent of lavender, and in every café, the ritual unfolds—a golden liquid poured into a glass, water added slowly, the transformation from amber clarity to milky opalescence. This is pastis, France's aperitif of choice, and the foundation upon which one of the world's greatest spirits dynasties was constructed.
Pernod Ricard's consolidated sales amounted to €10,959 million in fiscal year FY25. The company is listed on Euronext (Ticker: RI; ISIN Code: FR0000120693) and is part of the CAC 40 and Eurostoxx 50 indices. The portfolio reads like a who's who of the global drinks cabinet: Absolut vodka, Ricard pastis, Ballantine's, Chivas Regal, Royal Salute, and The Glenlivet Scotch whiskies, Jameson Irish whiskey, Martell cognac, Havana Club rum, Beefeater gin, Malibu liqueur and Mumm and Perrier-Jouët champagnes.
The central question of this story is deceptively simple yet strategically profound: how did two French anise-based aperitif makers—fierce domestic competitors with 80% of their business concentrated in France at the time of merger—become the world's second-largest spirits giant? The answer lies in a fifty-year saga of acquisition-driven strategy, premiumization, family control navigating activist pressure, and an almost preternatural ability to integrate brands while maintaining their distinct identities.
The company employs 18,224 people and distributes products across more than 160 countries, managing a portfolio exceeding 200 brands. From its birth in Marseille to a worldwide story of transformation, Pernod Ricard offers a masterclass in how patient capital, strategic ambition, and a touch of French Ă©lan can compound over decades.
This is not merely a story of corporate expansion. It's a tale of three generations of Ricard family leadership, of transformative deals executed at precisely the right moments, of an activist investor confrontation that exposed the tension between family values and shareholder returns, and of a company now sharpening its focus on premium spirits as consumer preferences evolve. Along the way, we'll explore what makes Pernod Ricard's decentralized model work, why the Absolut acquisition remains controversial, and what the recent wine divestiture signals about the company's future direction.
II. Origins: Absinthe, Pastis, and the Birth of French Aperitif Culture
The Pernod Legacy (1797–1975)
The story begins not in France but in Switzerland, in 1797, when Henri-Louis Pernod, a Swiss distiller, opened his first absinthe distillery in Switzerland. In 1805, Maison Pernod Fils was founded in Pontarlier, Franche-Comté, eastern France, by Henri-Louis Pernod and began production of the anise-flavored spirit known as absinthe.
Absinthe—la fée verte, the green fairy—became the drink of Belle Époque Paris, the choice of Toulouse-Lautrec, Van Gogh, Baudelaire. Its high alcohol content and supposed psychoactive effects from trace amounts of thujone triggered moral panic. The French government in 1915 enacted legislation to ban all alcoholic drinks that were more than 16% alcohol, acting as a complete prohibition on aniseed-based drinks, due to their being suspected of undermining the French war effort.
This regulatory upheaval forced Pernod into strategic adaptation—a pivot from absinthe to anise-based substitutes that retained the essential flavor profile without the prohibited wormwood. It was a harbinger of things to come. Throughout its two-century history, the company that would become Pernod Ricard would demonstrate remarkable capacity to adapt to regulatory constraints, turning apparent limitations into competitive advantages.
The Ricard Story (1932–1975)
If Pernod represents the aristocratic lineage of French anise spirits, Ricard embodies the scrappy entrepreneurial energy of Marseille. Paul Ricard was born in Sainte-Marthe, part of the 14th arrondissement of the city of Marseille, to a family of wine merchants. As a young man Ricard was introduced to the alcoholic beverage pastis by an old shepherd.
The young Paul—artistic by temperament but pushed by his father into the family wine business—recognized opportunity in chaos. As a result of the 1915 absinthe ban, Marseille locals started mixing their own aniseed-based drink, made from a combination of star anis, water, liquorice and herbs. While this "tiger's milk" circulated clandestinely through Provençal bistros, Paul Ricard set about refining the recipe.
In a still in his bedroom Ricard experimented with creating a more refined version, using, among other things, star anise, fennel seeds, liquorice and Provençal herbs. Ricard was prepared for the lifting of the prohibition on milder forms of aniseed spirits in 1932, and quickly overtook established companies like Pernod.
In 1932, Paul Ricard started the Ricard company to produce and distribute the product, purportedly declaring, 'It shall be called Ricard, the real pastis from Marseille!'
The commercial success was immediate and spectacular. The previous year Ricard had sold more than 2.4 million liters of his pastis. Paul Ricard proved as innovative in marketing as in distillation. Ricard was the first commercial sponsor of the Tour de France in 1948. He designed the brand's distinctive blue and yellow livery, inspired by the sky and sun of his native Marseille, and created an iconic jug for mixing pastis with water. In 1970 Ricard built the Circuit Paul Ricard, a race track near the village of Le Castellet—a facility that would host 14 editions of the Formula One French Grand Prix.
But war intervened again. Production of pastis was prohibited by the Vichy regime in 1940. Production became legal again in 1944. Paul Ricard navigated these disruptions, and by the time he stepped back from operations in 1968, he had built France's dominant pastis brand.
Paul Ricard retired in 1968; his son Patrick became CEO in 1978. But before that transition, Paul Ricard would orchestrate one final strategic masterstroke—the merger with his greatest rival.
Two Fierce Competitors Become One
By the early 1970s, both Pernod and Ricard had reached the limits of growth in their domestic market. At the time of their significant 1975 merger, approximately 80% of the combined business was concentrated within France. The arithmetic was compelling: together, they could combine production facilities, distribution networks, and brand portfolios to enable immediate dominance in the European anise aperitif sector while building the scale necessary for international expansion.
The merger was formalized in 1975 through a contract signed by Paul Ricard and Jean Hémard, establishing Pernod Ricard SA as a joint entity. The union has been likened to a consolidation between automotive giants General Motors and Ford—two fierce competitors recognizing that consolidation was the path to global competitiveness.
What emerged was more than the sum of its parts: a company with the heritage of both France's oldest absinthe producer and its most innovative pastis entrepreneur, equipped with complementary brands, combined expertise, and a shared vision of global expansion.
III. The 1975 Merger: Creating a French Spirits Champion
The marriage of Pernod and Ricard was not a hostile takeover or a financial engineering exercise. It was a strategic alliance between two families who recognized that the future lay beyond France's borders. Created in 1975 by the merger of Ricard and Pernod, the Group has undergone sustained development, based on both organic growth and acquisitions.
The logic was elegant: both companies possessed deep expertise in anise-based spirits and strong positions in their home market, but neither had the scale to compete against the emerging multinational drinks giants. The merger created a €200 million revenue entity with resources for international expansion.
Patrick Ricard, Paul's son, was appointed Group Managing Director at the merger and then Chairman and CEO in 1978. He was the architect of the Group's ambitious strategy of growth through acquisition, aimed at broadening the product range and accelerating the development of the international business.
The organizational model established at formation would prove remarkably durable. Rather than imposing centralized control, Pernod Ricard developed a decentralized structure that distinguished between "Brand Companies" (responsible for developing and marketing specific brand portfolios) and "Market Companies" (responsible for distribution and sales in specific geographies). This structure—radical for its time—recognized that spirits brands carry distinct cultural identities that centralized management might erode.
The strategic vision was clear from the outset: use the cash flows from the dominant French pastis business to fund international expansion and category diversification. The question was not whether to expand, but where and how quickly.
IV. Early International Expansion: From French Champion to Global Player (1975–2000)
Diversification and First International Moves
Patrick Ricard moved quickly to reduce dependence on France. At the time of their significant 1975 merger, approximately 80% of the combined business was concentrated within France. By 1979, the Pernod Ricard company had reduced its French reliance to just 60%—an extraordinary transformation in only four years that signaled the aggressive internationalization to come.
The first major overseas purchase came in 1980 with the acquisition of Wild Turkey, the American whiskey brand. This was more than a brand acquisition—it represented Pernod Ricard's entry into the U.S. market, the world's most profitable spirits market, and the whiskey category, which would become central to the company's future strategy.
In 1986, Pernod Ricard Japan was created, signaling the company's first venture into Asia—a region that would eventually grow to comprise 40% of Pernod Ricard's business.
The Jameson Turning Point
In 1988, Pernod Ricard acquired Irish Distillers makers of Jameson Irish whiskeys. At the time, Irish whiskey was a declining category, dismissed by the industry as an also-ran to Scotch. Jameson itself sold only a fraction of its current volume. But Patrick Ricard saw opportunity in the brand's heritage and potential for premiumization.
The acquisition proved transformational. Jameson has seen 27 consecutive years of growth and achieved sales of more than 5.8 million cases in 2016, a rise of 12 per cent on the previous year. Jameson is the world's fastest-growing Irish whiskey, experiencing 30 years of consecutive growth and hitting sales of 7.7m cases annually. In 1988, it was acquired by Pernod Ricard, which has since invested heavily in its brands to drive sales globally.
The Jameson success established the playbook that Pernod Ricard would deploy repeatedly: acquire a heritage brand with unrealized potential, invest in marketing and distribution, premiumize the portfolio through aged expressions and line extensions, and leverage the company's global distribution network to expand into new markets.
Building the Foundation
In 1989, Pernod Ricard acquired Orlando Wyndham makers of Jacob's Creek. This Australian wine acquisition gave the company a foothold in the New World wine segment and demonstrated willingness to diversify beyond spirits.
In 1993, Pernod Ricard and Cuban company Cuba Ron created Havana Club International, a 50/50 joint venture for the marketing of Havana Club rum. This joint venture with the Cuban state exemplified the company's willingness to pursue unconventional partnerships to access iconic brands.
Late-1990s efforts targeted emerging categories and geographies: Larios gin in Spain (Europe's leading gin brand), Yerevan Brandy Company in Armenia, and Wyborowa vodka distribution in Poland. Each acquisition expanded either the category portfolio or geographic footprint—or both.
By century's end, Pernod Ricard had transformed from a French pastis company into a genuinely multinational spirits group with operations spanning four continents. Sales outside France now accounted for a substantial majority of revenues. But the company remained a mid-tier player, lacking the scale to compete with giants like Diageo and the soon-to-be-dismantled Seagram empire.
That was about to change.
V. The Transformative Decade: Seagram, Allied Domecq, and Absolut (2001–2008)
The first decade of the new millennium would see Pernod Ricard execute three mega-acquisitions that fundamentally transformed it from a mid-tier regional player to a true global spirits powerhouse. Each deal was larger than the one before, each more complex to integrate, and together they established Pernod Ricard as the undisputed #2 in global spirits.
2001: The Seagram Acquisition — Doubling in Size
The opportunity emerged from Seagram's strategic confusion. The Canadian conglomerate, controlled by the Bronfman family, had diversified into entertainment through acquisitions of MCA and PolyGram. By 2000, Seagram merged with Vivendi Universal, and the French company was not interested in running a spirits business.
In 2001, Pernod Ricard acquired 38% of Seagram's Wines and Spirits business including Chivas Brothers Ltd makers of Chivas Regal and owner of 13 Scotch malt distilleries, 1 grain distillery and 2 gin distilleries.
The deal structure was complex. Diageo and Pernod Ricard jointly acquired Seagram's spirits portfolio, with each company taking different brands based on their existing portfolios and strategic priorities. Pernod Ricard's share included the crown jewels of blended Scotch (Chivas Regal, Royal Salute), premium single malt (The Glenlivet), and cognac (Martell).
Through the proposed transaction, Diageo and Pernod agreed to acquire the following significant brands: Captain Morgan Original Spiced Rum and Captain Morgan's Parrot Bay Rum (to be held by Diageo); and Seagram's Gin, Chivas Regal Scotch whisky, The Glenlivet Scotch whisky, and Martell Cognac (to be held by Pernod).
The scale was transformative. In a single stroke, Pernod Ricard doubled its size in the spirits sector, acquired the #2 Scotch whisky company (Chivas Brothers), and established major positions in the premium Scotch and cognac categories.
Over the past four years, Pernod Ricard has succeeded in re-launching these brands, whose sales had previously been constantly eroding. New positioning and new advertising campaigns, together with the strength of Pernod Ricard's distribution network, have allowed them to return to very strong growth, contributing significantly to the improved profitability of the Group.
The integration was remarkably successful. Chivas Brothers became the Scotch whisky arm of Pernod Ricard, and the company quickly demonstrated its ability to turn around key Seagram brands. The acquisition established a template: acquire premier brands, integrate them into the decentralized structure, invest in marketing and distribution, and drive growth.
2005: Allied Domecq — Becoming World #2
If Seagram doubled Pernod Ricard's size, the Allied Domecq acquisition doubled it again. The deal, valued at €10.7 billion, was at the time the largest in the industry and marked a significant step in Pernod Ricard's global expansion strategy.
Pernod Ricard struck a deal to acquire Allied Domecq for some £7.4 billion (€10.8 billion) in stock and cash, combining the world's second- and third-largest spirits makers to create a company to rival Diageo, the market leader.
In 2005, Pernod Ricard becomes world #2 wine and spirits organisation with the acquisition of Allied Domecq and brands such as Mumm, Perrier-Jouët, Ballantine's, Malibu and Beefeater.
The deal structure involved partnership with Fortune Brands to address regulatory concerns. In early 2005, a takeover bid for the company was launched by French-based rival Pernod Ricard. Pernod Ricard successfully completed acquisition on 26 July 2005 and sold off the overlapping spirits brands to U.S.-based competitor Fortune Brands.
Fortune Brands paid an agreed price of approximately 2.8 billion British pounds (5.3 billion U.S. dollars at current exchange rates) in cash for the brands, related production facilities and key distribution assets. Fortune took brands including Courvoisier, Maker's Mark, Canadian Club, and Sauza tequila—assets that might have created antitrust issues if retained by Pernod Ricard.
Patrick Ricard celebrated the achievement: "I would like to say how excited we are by this transaction, which is a new major strategic step in Pernod Ricard's development. I believe that Allied Domecq's magnificent portfolio of brands has a great future within our Group."
The company completed the integration of Allied Domecq into the Group in March 2006, less than one year after finalizing the acquisition. "We believe that the rapid integration of Allied Domecq into our Group illustrates our ability to successfully complete significant business combinations."
The speed of integration was remarkable given the deal's scale—a testament to the decentralized organizational model that allowed acquired brands to maintain operational autonomy while leveraging Pernod Ricard's global distribution network.
2008: Absolut Vodka — The Crown Jewel?
The final piece of the transformative decade came from an unexpected seller: the Kingdom of Sweden. V&S Vin & Sprit, owner of Absolut Vodka, was a state-owned enterprise that Sweden decided to privatize as part of a broader divestiture of government assets.
France's Pernod Ricard won a hotly contested auction on Monday to buy the maker of Sweden's Absolut vodka for 5.63 billion euro ($8.87 billion), beating favourite Jim Beam bourbon-maker Fortune Brands.
Patrick Ricard, Chairman and CEO of Pernod Ricard, said: "After Seagram and Allied Domecq in 2001 and 2005, this is the third transformational acquisition for the Group."
The transaction is valued at €5.69 billion, including debt. The acquisition of V&S enables Pernod Ricard to assume co-leadership of the global wine and spirits industry.
Absolut Vodka complemented Pernod Ricard's existing portfolio and provided a strong platform for the company to expand its global reach. With the acquisition of V&S, Pernod Ricard becomes the co-leader in the global wine & spirits industry with a global spirits volumes of 91 million cases and the number 1 position in premium spirits with a 27% market share.
However, the Absolut acquisition would become the most controversial of Pernod Ricard's mega-deals. Elliott later argued Pernod's €6bn acquisition of Absolut vodka in 2008 "fell short of expectations". The brand, which sells 11.3 million cases globally, has struggled to claw back growth in its key US market in recent years.
The criticism has merit. Absolut faced intensifying competition in the U.S. premium vodka segment from brands like Tito's, Ketel One, and emerging craft players. The brand's growth slowed significantly after acquisition, raising questions about whether Pernod overpaid.
Yet context matters. The acquisition made Pernod Ricard the #2 player in the critical U.S. market, filled a significant gap in its vodka portfolio, and provided critical mass in global distribution. Whether the €5.7 billion price was justified depends on counterfactual assumptions about what Pernod Ricard's competitive position would have been without Absolut.
Integration and Organizational Model
Pernod Ricard employs a workforce of approximately 18,900 people and operates through a decentralised organisation, with 6 "Brand Companies" and 86 "Market Companies" established in each key market.
The decentralized model—unusual for consumer goods companies of this scale—proved essential for integrating three massive acquisitions in seven years. Rather than imposing standardized processes on acquired brands, Pernod Ricard preserved their distinct cultures while providing access to shared services and global distribution.
By 2008, Pernod Ricard had transformed from a €5 billion company into a €7+ billion global spirits leader. The strategy proved a resounding success, particularly through the acquisitions of Seagram and Allied Domecq, sales outside France now accounting for 90% of turnover as against 17% when the Group was formed.
But this breakneck expansion came at a cost: elevated debt levels, integration challenges, and questions about whether the company could deliver organic growth commensurate with its scale. These questions would intensify in the years ahead.
VI. Leadership Transition: From Patrick to Alexandre Ricard (2012–2015)
On August 17, 2012, Patrick Ricard died suddenly at age 67. Patrick Ricard (12 May 1945 – 17 August 2012) was a French entrepreneur and chairman and CEO of the liquor and wine group Pernod Ricard. He died suddenly on 17 August 2012 following a cardiac incident in Toulon.
French media reports suggest that he suffered a fatal heart attack while holidaying on the family-owned island of Bendor, off the French Riviera. The timing was unexpected; Patrick had stepped back from executive duties in 2008, becoming chairman of the board, but remained the patriarch of both company and family.
The succession had been planned. After going on to manage the Pernod Ricard distribution network, Alexandre Ricard was appointed Chief Operating Officer and Deputy Chief Executive Officer of Pernod Ricard on August 29, 2012, shortly after his uncle and then-CEO Patrick Ricard suddenly died.
Alexandre Ricard, Paul Ricard's grandson and Patrick's nephew, represented the third generation of family leadership. He became Chairman & Chief Executive Officer of Pernod Ricard, the world's second-biggest distiller by sales, on February 11, 2015. At 43, he was the youngest Chief Executive Officer of the 40 top companies on the CAC 40, the Paris Stock Market.
Alexandre's credentials were impeccable. He graduated from ESCP Europe (Ecole Supérieure de Commerce de Paris) in 1995. He holds an MBA with a specialization in Finance and Entrepreneurship from the Wharton School of Business and an MA in International Studies from the University of Pennsylvania School of Arts and Sciences, which he obtained in 2001.
Crucially, Alexandre had not relied on family connections to advance. After working for seven years outside the Group, for Accenture (Strategy and Consulting) and Morgan Stanley (Mergers and Acquisitions Consulting), he joined Pernod Ricard in 2003 in the Audit and Development Department at the Headquarters.
At the end of 2004, he became the Chief Financial and Administration Officer of Irish Distillers Group, and then Chief Executive Officer of Pernod Ricard Asia Duty Free in September 2006. In July 2008, he was appointed Chairman and CEO of Irish Distillers Group and became a member of Pernod Ricard's Executive Committee. In September 2011, he joined the Group Senior Management as Managing Director, Distribution Network and became a member of the Executive Board.
The Irish Distillers posting was particularly significant. Alexandre took the helm of Jameson during a critical growth phase, experiencing firsthand how a well-managed heritage brand could deliver sustained growth. Two years later, he was asked to head up the Jameson Whiskey brand as CEO of Irish Distillers, an experience he always mentions enthusiastically.
The transition preserved family control while bringing modern professional management credentials. But it also preserved the tension inherent in Pernod Ricard's structure: Half of the 14-strong board was said to have links to the Ricard family and the family was the biggest shareholder with 14% of shares and 20% of voting rights.
This concentration of family influence would soon attract unwelcome attention from Wall Street's most aggressive activist investor.
VII. The Elliott Activist Campaign: A Wake-Up Call (2018–2019)
Elliott's Arrival
In December 2018, the world's largest activist hedge fund arrived at Pernod Ricard's doorstep. The world's largest activist hedge fund, Elliott Management Corporation, has taken a stake of more than 2.5% in Pernod Ricard in a bid to improve the French group's market share.
The world's second-largest wine and spirits group came under fire from US billionaire Paul Singer's Elliott, which built up a stake worth about €1 billion ($1.13 billion) equivalent to about a 2.5% stake in the company controlled by the third generation Ricard family.
The spat exposed the differences in strategy between families and investors—patient capital versus agitator capital—and followed similar disruptions involving Elliott and the families behind Samsung Electronics and Hyundai Motor Group.
Elliott's Critique
Elliott's attack was comprehensive and pointed. Elliott said that despite the "favourable economic backdrop for the spirits industry over the last decade", Pernod Ricard has lost market share in key areas and "underperformed its peers on several metrics". Operating margins at Pernod have a five-percentage point disadvantage to rival Diageo after "successive operational improvement plans failed to generate operating leverage".
The fund said that "inadequate corporate governance and a lack of outside perspectives" at the family-controlled firm had contributed to its financial underperformance compared to competitors such as Britain-based Diageo.
In a letter to Pernod's management, Elliott suggested it consider a merger: "the board should remain open to opportunities made possible by an industry well positioned for further consolidation, including a merger with another large spirits player in order to deliver additional value to shareholders." Elliott added that it had identified measures that could unlock 500 million euros in annual savings.
Analysts noted that Pernod Ricard had a profit margin of 26.23 percent in 2017/18 against rival Diageo's 31.4 percent. The margin gap was real and significant—roughly €500 million annually in foregone operating profit at Pernod's revenue base.
Pernod's Response
Alexandre Ricard's response blended acknowledgment with defiance. "We are a Group with strong family values committed to long-term value creation. Over the past three years, we have created more than €11bn of value and our share price has increased by +37.7%, significantly outperforming the CAC40 index (+5.6%) and the Eurostoxx Food & Beverage index (-13.4%). That being said, long-term value creation is not measured by share price performance alone but by taking into account the interests of all stakeholders."
The company had anticipated the confrontation. The company had been working since the summer of 2018 on a new three-year strategy plan dubbed "Transform and Accelerate". It said it expected to deliver a promised 200 million euros in savings by June 2019, a year ahead of their initial target.
The governance response was swift. In January, the spirits maker named Patricia Barbizet as lead independent director and charged the former CEO of auction house Christie's with overseeing relations with investors, especially on governance matters.
Last month, it encouraged employees to become "activists of conviviality"—a characteristically French response that acknowledged the critique while reframing the narrative.
Outcome and Legacy
The Elliott campaign accelerated cost-cutting initiatives already underway. The "Transform and Accelerate" plan delivered operational improvements, and the margin gap with Diageo began to narrow. More importantly, the episode forced Pernod Ricard to articulate more clearly its vision of long-term value creation and the role of family control in achieving it.
The Ricards are a family that grew up in the industry and have accompanied the transformational journey Pernod Ricard is on. Upon news of Elliott's investment, they said, if you do a single thing that jeopardises long-term value creation, well—they didn't finish the sentence.
The family's response was telling. The Ricards reportedly purchased an additional block of shares worth approximately €500 million, demonstrating commitment while consolidating control. The message was clear: this remained a family company, and the family would not be pushed out.
For investors, the Elliott episode offered several lessons. First, Pernod Ricard was not immune to activist pressure despite family control. Second, the company could respond effectively when challenged—the Transform and Accelerate plan delivered tangible results. Third, the tension between family values and shareholder returns was real but manageable.
VIII. Modern Era: Premiumization, Portfolio Reshaping, and New Challenges (2019–2025)
Premium Spirits Strategy
In terms of market performance, Pernod Ricard has shown remarkable resilience during economic downturns, largely due to its premium brand positioning and strong presence in emerging markets. Their strategic focus on premiumization has led to consistent profit margin improvements, with premium brands now accounting for over 60% of their sales.
The premiumization strategy reflects a fundamental insight about spirits consumption: consumers increasingly prefer to drink less but better. This trend, accelerated by health consciousness and evolving social norms, favors companies with strong positions in premium and super-premium categories—exactly where Pernod Ricard has concentrated its portfolio.
Recent acquisitions have reinforced this positioning. The company acquired super-premium gin Monkey 47 and majority stakes in high-end bourbon producer Smooth Ambler and Del Maguey Single Village, the #1 mezcal in the United States.
Acquisitions included super-premium brands Malfy and Rabbit Hole Whiskey, plus Castle Brands (Jefferson's) and Firestone & Robertson Distilling Co, owner of the super-premium TX Whiskey.
In 2023, Pernod Ricard acquired a majority stake in Codigo 1530 prestige tequila, in Skrewball super-premium flavored whiskey and in Ace Beverage, Canada's leading ready-to-drink alcoholic beverage Group.
Each acquisition targets high-growth segments of the spirits market: craft gin, premium American whiskey, artisanal mezcal, and prestige tequila. The strategy positions Pernod Ricard to capture value as consumers trade up from mass-market spirits.
Strategic Divestitures: Sharpening the Focus
The flip side of premium acquisitions has been divestiture of non-core assets. The most significant: Pernod Ricard announces today the successful completion of the sale of its portfolio of strategic international wines to Australian Wine Holdco Limited ("AWL"), a consortium of international institutional investors and owner of Accolade Wines, effective as of April 30, 2025.
Effective April 30, 2025, this transaction marked the birth of a new global wine powerhouse: Vinarchy. The deal had been first announced in a press release dated July 17, 2024.
Among the brands heading to Accolade were: Jacob's Creek, Orlando and St Hugo from Australia; Stoneleigh, Brancott Estate and Church Road from New Zealand; and Campo Viejo, Ysios, Tarsus and Azpilicueta from Spain.
"This disposal will allow Pernod Ricard to further strengthen its premiumisation strategy and to direct its resources to its portfolio of premium international spirits and champagne brands that drive the growth of its business."
The Managing Director of Pernod Ricard Pacific said the sale "removed any drag on our portfolio from wine, and it was a bit of a drag on the portfolio."
In July 2025, Pernod Ricard sold the Irish whiskey brands Clontarf and Knappogue Castle to Cobblestone Brands, and the Indian whisky Imperial Blue to Tilaknagar Industries.
These divestitures represent strategic clarity: Pernod Ricard is betting its future on premium spirits and champagne, not wine. The logic is financial—spirits generally offer higher margins than wine—and strategic—the company believes it can create more value by focusing its resources.
Innovation: Chinese Whisky and No/Low Alcohol
Perhaps the most intriguing recent development: In December 2023, Pernod Ricard China began distributing The Chuan Pure Malt Whisky across the country. "The inauguration of The Chuan Distillery is the culmination of a pioneering adventure. We have blended the natural beauty of the Emeishan landscape in China with the skill and craftsmanship of our distillers to produce a whisky to be proud of."
The announcement celebrated Pernod Ricard's achievement as the first international spirits and wines group to establish a fully operational malt whisky distillery in China. With an investment of 1 billion RMB (150 million USD) over a decade, The Chuan Malt Whisky Distillery reflects Pernod Ricard's commitment to China.
The Chuan represents a strategic bet on China's emerging whisky market—and an attempt to capture value from domestic production rather than importing from Scotland. The whisky utilizes both European and Chinese barley and is aged in three types of oak from three continents: bourbon casks from America, sherry casks from Spain and proprietary Chinese Single Oak casks.
On the no/low alcohol front, Pernod Ricard launched Beefeater 0.0%, an alcohol-free version of the iconic London dry Gin. This addresses the moderation trend without cannibalizing the core spirits business.
Alexandre Ricard has noted the company believes consumers are buying into the idea of drinking "less but better", which is playing into the firm's long-term premiumisation strategy.
Current Challenges
FY25 organic net sales declined -3.0%, with declines in China, USA and GTR Asia negatively impacting mix, while many markets posted resilient to strong growth. Profit from Recurring Operations was €2,951m, an organic decline of -0.8%, with gross margin impacted by negative market mix while benefitting from COGS efficiency programs.
Weakness in China further deteriorated by technical suspension of duty-free regime on Cognac due to anti-dumping measures. Martell, in strong decline contributing to approximately 90% of total Group net sales decline, was heavily impacted by China and Global Travel Retail.
The company delivered strong FY25 organic operating margin expansion at +64bps, supported by the completion in FY25 of a €900m efficiency program FY23-25 and strong cost discipline. Free cash flow reached €1.1bn (+18%), notably with strong operating working capital management.
The company has outlined its medium-term trajectory: Ongoing efficiencies with €900m delivered FY23 to FY25 and €1bn program targeted from FY26 to FY29.
IX. Competitive Positioning: Porter's Forces and Strategic Moats
Industry Structure
In 2023, the global spirits market achieved a remarkable milestone, reaching $797.7 billion in sales value. The industry is dominated by a handful of global players: Diageo, Pernod Ricard, LVMH's Moët Hennessy, Suntory, Brown-Forman, and a long tail of regional and craft producers.
Threat of New Entrants (Low-Medium): Spirits production requires significant capital investment in distillation equipment, aging inventory (particularly for whiskey and cognac), and marketing. Aged spirits categories have natural barriers—a new entrant cannot produce 18-year-old Scotch in less than 18 years. However, "white spirits" (vodka, gin, unaged tequila) have lower barriers, and craft producers have demonstrated ability to capture premium segments.
Supplier Power (Low): Raw materials (grains, grapes, agave) are commodities. Pernod Ricard's scale provides significant purchasing leverage, though specialty ingredients (e.g., specific barley varieties) may offer some supplier power.
Buyer Power (Medium): Large retailers and distributors (e.g., LVMH-owned Sephora in duty-free, national grocery chains) wield significant power. However, strong brands command shelf space and consumer loyalty, limiting buyer leverage for must-stock products.
Threat of Substitutes (Medium-High): This is perhaps the most significant medium-term concern. Cannabis legalization in key markets, health-consciousness driving moderation, and the rise of non-alcoholic alternatives all represent substitution risks. Wellness (non-alcoholic drink sales grew 12% in 2024) represents a meaningful trend, though one Pernod is addressing through its own no/low offerings.
Industry Rivalry (High): Competition between Diageo and Pernod Ricard is intense across categories and geographies. Marketing spend is significant (Pernod maintains approximately 16% of sales in advertising and promotion), and both companies compete aggressively for acquisition targets and distribution relationships.
Hamilton Helmer's 7 Powers
Evaluating Pernod Ricard through the lens of strategic moats:
1. Scale Economies: Present but not dominant. Pernod achieves economies in production, procurement, and marketing. However, Diageo is around 43% larger than Pernod Ricard in sales terms, and scale advantages have not prevented margin gaps versus the larger competitor.
2. Network Economies: Limited. Unlike digital platforms, spirits do not exhibit strong network effects where more users make the product more valuable.
3. Counter-Positioning: Evident in the decentralized model. Pernod Ricard's organizational structure—preserving brand autonomy while providing shared services—is genuinely difficult for competitors to replicate without dismantling existing centralized structures.
4. Switching Costs: Moderate for trade customers (bars, restaurants must stock leading brands), low for consumers (easy to switch between spirits brands).
5. Branding: This is Pernod Ricard's primary power. Pernod Ricard possesses the most comprehensive spirits portfolio globally, distributing over 240 brands across 160 countries. Flagship spirits brands include Absolut vodka, Beefeater gin, Chivas Regal and The Glenlivet scotch whisky, Jameson Irish whiskey, Malibu rum, and Martell cognac. Brands with centuries of heritage and global recognition command consumer premium and retailer priority.
6. Cornered Resource: Pernod's aging inventory represents a cornered resource—you cannot manufacture 21-year-old whisky without having laid down that inventory 21 years ago. This creates genuine barriers for new entrants and production constraints that prevent commodity competition in aged categories.
7. Process Power: Demonstrated in integration capability. The company's track record of successfully integrating major acquisitions (Seagram, Allied Domecq, V&S) while preserving brand equity represents organizational process power that competitors have struggled to replicate.
X. Bull Case and Bear Case
The Bull Case
Premiumization Tailwinds: The global shift toward "less but better" consumption structurally favors Pernod's premium-focused portfolio. As emerging market middle classes expand, demand for premium spirits should grow faster than GDP.
Jameson's Continued Growth: Sales of Jameson outstripped growth across the wider portfolio in the year to June 30th 2025, at 3 per cent globally, including double-digit net sales growth in markets across Asia, Africa and Latin America. Irish whiskey remains the fastest-growing major spirits category, and Pernod dominates with 75%+ market share.
Portfolio Optionality: The comprehensive brand portfolio provides exposure to multiple growth vectors—tequila, Japanese whisky, RTDs—without concentration risk in any single category.
Operational Improvement: €900m efficiency program delivered FY23-25, with €1bn targeted FY26-29. Margin gap with Diageo has narrowed meaningfully since the Elliott intervention.
China Long-Term: Despite near-term weakness, China remains one of the world's largest and fastest-growing spirits markets. In China, Pernod Ricard owns one distillery (The Chuan) and one winery, representing long-term positioning in this critical market.
The Bear Case
China Risk: In China, Pernod's annual 2025 sales fell 21 per cent as weak consumer demand and the looming conclusion of an anti-dumping investigation led to an overhang in distributor inventories. The anti-dumping investigation on European cognac creates significant uncertainty, and Martell is heavily exposed.
U.S. Market Challenges: The U.S. remains the world's most profitable spirits market, but Pernod has underperformed. Absolut continues to struggle against competitors, and the company lacks the domestic bourbon scale of Brown-Forman or Suntory (via Beam).
Moderation Trend: Secular decline in alcohol consumption, particularly among younger consumers, could compress the industry's growth ceiling. Moderation among younger drinkers is often framed as an existential threat to spirits companies.
Valuation vs. Diageo: Despite the margin gap narrowing, Diageo typically trades at a premium multiple reflecting its larger scale, stronger U.S. position, and leading market share in key categories.
Currency and Tariff Exposure: FY25 Net Sales included a negative FX impact of -€277m mainly due to the Turkish Lira, Argentinean Peso and Indian Rupee. Global spirits companies face significant currency translation risk, and tariff escalation (particularly U.S.-EU tensions) could disrupt trade flows.
XI. Key Metrics to Watch
For investors monitoring Pernod Ricard, three metrics warrant particular attention:
1. Organic Sales Growth (excluding FX and M&A)
This is the purest measure of underlying business momentum. Management has guided to 3-6% annual organic sales growth for 2027-2029. Performance relative to this guidance—and relative to Diageo's organic growth—indicates competitive positioning and brand health.
2. Operating Margin (Profit from Recurring Operations / Net Sales)
The margin gap with Diageo has historically been the primary financial critique of Pernod Ricard. Strong FY25 organic operating margin expansion at +64bps indicates progress. Continued margin expansion validates operational improvement, while stagnation would suggest structural cost disadvantages.
3. Organic Growth by Strategic Brand
Pernod Ricard's value is concentrated in its 13 Strategic International Brands. Monitoring organic growth rates for Jameson, Absolut, Ballantine's, Chivas Regal, and Martell provides granular insight into portfolio health. Particular attention should be paid to Absolut's U.S. performance and Martell's China recovery.
XII. Regulatory and Accounting Considerations
Regulatory Overhangs: The anti-dumping investigation into European cognac imports to China creates material uncertainty for Martell. Weakness in China further deteriorated by technical suspension of duty-free regime on Cognac due to anti-dumping measures. Resolution of this investigation—and any resulting tariffs—could significantly impact Pernod's largest cognac market.
Goodwill and Intangibles: Spirits companies carry substantial goodwill and intangible assets from brand acquisitions. For Pernod Ricard, brands like Absolut, Chivas, and Jameson were acquired at significant premiums to tangible book value. While impairment has not been material, investors should monitor for any deterioration in brand values that could trigger write-downs.
Inventory Accounting: Aged spirits inventories (whiskey, cognac) represent significant working capital. The company must balance production against uncertain future demand 5-25 years hence. Inventory valuation policies and aging inventory levels are important financial statement items.
Debt Levels: Net debt reached €10,951m as of June 2023. The Net Debt/EBITDA ratio increased to 3.1x. While manageable, leverage constrains flexibility for major acquisitions and creates interest rate sensitivity.
XIII. Conclusion: The Long Game
Fifty years after two Marseille pastis rivals agreed to merge, Pernod Ricard stands as the world's second-largest spirits company—a remarkable transformation achieved through strategic discipline, acquisition acumen, and patient family stewardship.
The journey has not been linear. The Absolut acquisition remains debated. Elliott's intervention forced uncomfortable introspection. China's current challenges test the company's emerging market thesis. But through each challenge, Pernod Ricard has demonstrated adaptive capacity that belies its Mediterranean origins.
The company's mission is to ensure the long-term growth of its brands with full respect for people and the environment, while empowering employees around the world to be ambassadors of a purposeful, inclusive and responsible culture of authentic conviviality.
"Conviviality"—the word appears everywhere in Pernod Ricard's communications. It is not mere marketing language. It reflects the French cultural heritage that shapes how the company thinks about its brands: not as commodities to be optimized, but as enablers of human connection to be nurtured.
Whether this philosophy translates into superior shareholder returns relative to more ruthlessly efficient competitors remains the central investment question. The answer likely depends on time horizon. For patient capital aligned with multi-generational brand building, Pernod Ricard offers a differentiated approach to value creation. For those seeking aggressive margin expansion and M&A engineering, Diageo may offer a more suitable vehicle.
What is clear: the company that Paul Ricard built from a bedroom still in Marseille has become a global enterprise whose brands are enjoyed by consumers on every continent. The spirit of conviviality, it seems, travels well.
Myth vs. Reality Box: Common Narratives Examined
| Narrative | Reality |
|---|---|
| "Pernod overpaid for Absolut" | Contested. Absolut has underperformed in the U.S., but the acquisition secured the #2 U.S. market position and filled a critical portfolio gap. True cost depends on counterfactual assumptions. |
| "Family control prevents shareholder value creation" | Partially true, partially false. Family influence has enabled long-term thinking but historically tolerated margin underperformance. Elliott's intervention demonstrated that family control is not impervious to activist pressure. |
| "Emerging market growth will offset mature market decline" | Uncertain. Emerging markets (particularly India) are growing, but China weakness has demonstrated that these markets carry their own risks. Geographic diversification reduces concentration but doesn't eliminate cyclicality. |
| "Spirits are recession-proof" | Mostly true for premium categories. Consumers tend to trade down within spirits rather than abandoning the category entirely. However, extended economic stress can compress volumes. |
Spotify
Apple Podcasts
Amazon Music
Audible
YouTube
Castbox
Pocket Casts