Chat with this content: Summary, Analysis, News...
Share on Reddit
EXOR N.V.: The Agnelli Empire's Century-Long Evolution
I. Introduction & Episode Roadmap
Picture this: A single Italian family controls Ferrari, holds the largest stake in Stellantis (the world's fourth-largest automaker), owns a piece of The Economist, and runs Juventus—arguably Italy's most iconic football club. This isn't a Netflix drama about fictional oligarchs. This is EXOR N.V., the €15+ billion market cap holding company that represents over a century of the Agnelli family's industrial and financial evolution.EXOR today commands a market capitalization of approximately €18-20 billion, trading on Euronext Amsterdam under the symbol EXO. But here's what makes this story particularly compelling: unlike most European conglomerates that emerged from post-war industrialization, EXOR represents something far older and more complex—a century-long evolution from a single automotive company into a sophisticated investment vehicle that has successfully navigated world wars, economic crises, family succession battles, and industry disruptions.
The genius of EXOR isn't just what it owns—though the portfolio reads like a who's who of European industrial aristocracy. It's how the Agnelli family, now led by fourth-generation scion John Elkann, has repeatedly reinvented its holding structure while maintaining iron-clad control. Think of it as the European answer to Berkshire Hathaway, but with Italian flair, Dutch corporate efficiency, and a remarkable ability to execute complex financial engineering that would make most investment bankers dizzy. At the end of 2024, EXOR's Net Asset Value (NAV) reached €38.2 billion, with NAV per share increasing by 9%—a metric that the company uses as its North Star for performance measurement. The story we're about to explore spans from Turin workshops in 1899 to today's sophisticated financial engineering, from Giovanni Agnelli's original vision to John Elkann's modern transformation playbook.
This isn't just a tale of wealth preservation across generations—though that alone would be remarkable given that 90% of family fortunes don't survive to the third generation. It's a masterclass in strategic portfolio evolution, corporate restructuring, and what happens when you combine patient capital with opportunistic deal-making. Over the next several hours, we'll dissect how a traditional Italian industrial conglomerate transformed itself into one of Europe's most sophisticated investment vehicles, executing spin-offs worth tens of billions, navigating the 2008 financial crisis, and emerging stronger after each challenge.
Our roadmap takes us through five distinct eras: Giovanni Agnelli's foundational empire-building from 1899 to the 1960s; the Gianni Agnelli era of global expansion and the Ferrari partnership; the crisis years and EXOR's formation in the 2000s; the great restructuring that created today's portfolio; and finally, John Elkann's current strategy of luxury, healthcare, and technology investments. Along the way, we'll unpack the key inflection points—from the 2016 Ferrari spin-off that unlocked billions in value to the 2021 Stellantis merger that created the world's fourth-largest automaker.
The themes that emerge are fascinating: How does a family maintain control while accessing public markets? What's the art of the strategic breakup? And perhaps most intriguingly—how do you manage a portfolio where your smallest holding (Ferrari at 19.5% economic rights) might be your most valuable asset? Let's begin where all great industrial stories start: with an ambitious entrepreneur and a vision that nobody else could see.
II. The Foundation: Giovanni Agnelli & Early Empire Building (1899-1960s)
The rain was hammering down on Turin's cobblestone streets on July 11, 1899, when a group of Italian aristocrats and industrialists gathered to sign the founding documents of Fabbrica Italiana Automobili Torino—FIAT. Among them stood Giovanni Agnelli, then just 33 years old, a cavalry officer turned industrialist who would lay the foundation for what would become Europe's most enduring industrial dynasty. While his partners saw automobiles as expensive toys for the wealthy, Agnelli envisioned something radically different: mass motorization that would transform not just Italy, but all of Europe.
The early years were anything but glamorous. FIAT's first factory was a converted horse stable that produced just 24 cars in 1900. Agnelli, who became managing director in 1902 and acquired a controlling stake by 1908, drove the company with an almost manic intensity. He would arrive at the factory before dawn, personally inspecting production lines, arguing with engineers over design details, and negotiating with suppliers until late into the evening. His management style was autocratic but visionary—he insisted on vertical integration before the term was even coined, bringing component manufacturing in-house to control quality and costs.
By 1927, Agnelli had built FIAT into Italy's largest industrial company, but he recognized a fundamental problem: the ownership structure was becoming unwieldy, with shares scattered among family members, early investors, and employees. His solution was elegantly simple yet revolutionary for Italian capitalism. He established Istituto Finanziario Industriale (IFI), a holding company that consolidated not just his FIAT shares but his sprawling investments across multiple sectors. This wasn't mere financial engineering—it was the creation of a control mechanism that would endure for a century.
The IFI portfolio read like a cross-section of Italian industry. There was Cinzano, the vermouth maker whose aperitifs lubricated Turin's café society. Società Anonima Manifattura Pellami e Calzature produced leather goods and shoes for Italy's growing middle class. SAVA provided financial services, while Società Aviolinee Italiane represented Agnelli's bet on commercial aviation. The industrial holdings included RIV (ball bearings), Vetrocoke (glass and coke production), and Società Idroelettrica Piemontese (hydroelectric power). Real estate came through Sestriere, which developed ski resorts in the Alps. This wasn't random diversification—each investment either supplied FIAT, served its workers, or bet on Italy's modernization.
The acquisition of Juventus Football Club in 1923 seemed an outlier, a rich man's folly. But Agnelli understood something his peers didn't: Juventus wasn't just a football team, it was a cultural institution that connected FIAT to the hearts of millions of Italians. The team's black and white stripes became as recognizable as FIAT's logo, creating brand loyalty that no advertising campaign could match. Similarly, his purchase of La Stampa newspaper gave the family a voice in national discourse, shaping public opinion on everything from labor relations to foreign policy.
FIAT's strategy during this period was captured in the phrase "terra, mare e cielo"—earth, sea, and sky. The company didn't just make cars; it manufactured trucks, tractors, marine engines, and aircraft. During the 1930s, FIAT produced everything from the tiny Topolino ("little mouse") car that put Italy on wheels to military aircraft that would soon fill European skies. This diversification wasn't driven by financial theory but by Agnelli's belief that Italy needed a complete industrial ecosystem, and FIAT would provide it.
World War II nearly destroyed everything. Allied bombing raids reduced FIAT's factories to rubble, production ceased, and Giovanni Agnelli himself died in December 1945, just months after the war's end. His grandson, also named Giovanni but known as Gianni, was just 24 and wholly unprepared to lead. The company fell to professional managers and Agnelli's son-in-law, but the holding structure Giovanni had created—IFI at the top, controlling FIAT and the other investments—survived intact.
The post-war reconstruction transformed disaster into opportunity. With Marshall Plan aid flowing into Italy and pent-up demand for vehicles, FIAT roared back to life. The company's 600 and 500 models became symbols of Italy's economic miracle, affordable enough for working families yet stylish enough to embody la dolce vita. By 1957, the family felt confident enough to make another strategic move, acquiring IFIL (Istituto Finanziario Italiano di LiquiditĂ ), which would handle more liquid investments while IFI maintained strategic holdings.
The establishment of IFINT (IFI International) in 1964 marked the family's recognition that Italy alone was too small a stage. This vehicle would spearhead international investments, taking stakes in companies from Paris to New York. The structure was becoming Byzantine—IFI controlled IFIL, both controlled FIAT, while IFINT pursued foreign adventures—but this complexity served a purpose. It created multiple layers of control that insulated the family from hostile takeovers while allowing access to public capital markets.
What Giovanni Agnelli built wasn't just an industrial empire but a system of governance that balanced family control with professional management, Italian roots with international ambition, industrial focus with financial sophistication. The seeds he planted—the holding company structure, the cultural investments, the diversification strategy—would define the Agnelli empire for generations. As we transition to the Gianni era, we see how his grandson would take these foundations and build something even more audacious: a global luxury and industrial conglomerate anchored by the most famous prancing horse in the world.
III. The Gianni Agnelli Era: Global Expansion & Ferrari (1960s-2003)
Gianni Agnelli stepped out of his Lancia Flaminia at Maranello on a humid June morning in 1969, his perfectly tailored Caraceni suit somehow immune to the oppressive heat. Enzo Ferrari, the commendatore himself, waited in his office—a spartan room dominated by a massive desk and photos of drivers, many now dead. The two men had been circling each other for years, proud, stubborn, and keenly aware that they needed each other. Ferrari needed capital to keep racing; Agnelli needed the prestige that only Ferrari could provide. After hours of negotiation, punctuated by Enzo's theatrical storming out and Agnelli's urbane patience, they struck a deal that would reshape both companies. FIAT would acquire 50% of Ferrari's road car business while Enzo retained complete control of the racing division—his non-negotiable demand.
This wasn't Agnelli's first audacious move, but it perfectly captured his approach to empire building. Where his grandfather built through industrial logic, Gianni operated on instinct, charm, and an aesthetic sense that treated business as an extension of personal style. L'Avvocato (the Lawyer), as he was universally known despite never practicing law, had assumed control of the family holdings in 1966 after a power struggle with his younger brother Umberto. His arrival marked a seismic shift—from provincial Italian industrialist to international playboy-tycoon who counted the Kennedys, Henry Kissinger, and David Rockefeller among his intimate friends.
The Ferrari acquisition exemplified Gianni's genius for complex, relationship-based deals. The agreement wasn't just about equity percentages—it was a carefully choreographed dance of egos. Enzo Ferrari maintained his office, his authority over racing, and most importantly, his dignity. FIAT got the industrial capacity and eventual control (upped to 90% after Enzo's death in 1988), but more valuable was the association with Ferrari's mystique. Suddenly, FIAT wasn't just a maker of utilitarian city cars—it controlled the most prestigious automotive brand in the world.
Through IFINT, established in the previous era, Agnelli embarked on an international shopping spree that would have been unimaginable to his grandfather. The portfolio expanded into seemingly random directions, but each investment reflected Gianni's worldview—a mixture of industrial logic, social positioning, and personal fascination. He took stakes in Club Med, seeing the democratization of leisure before it became obvious. The acquisition of Château Margaux wasn't about wine profits but about owning a piece of French civilization. His investment in Rockefeller Center—joining the Rockefellers themselves in the partnership—announced that the Agnellis had arrived on the global stage.
The corporate structure during this period became almost incomprehensibly complex, but this complexity served multiple purposes. IFI sat at the apex, controlling IFIL, which controlled FIAT, which controlled Ferrari and dozens of other subsidiaries. Meanwhile, IFINT pursued international investments, and various other vehicles handled specific sectors or geographies. This Russian doll structure made hostile takeovers virtually impossible while maintaining family control with minimal capital. By 1984, Gianni formalized this through Giovanni Agnelli S.a.p.a., a partnership that consolidated family members' holdings in IFI. The structure evolved in 1987 when more family members joined (renaming it Giovanni Agnelli e C. S.a.p.az.), controlling over 70% of IFI's ordinary shares.
The 1990s brought new challenges and opportunities. The Toro Assicurazioni insurance company expanded FIAT's financial services footprint. Investments ranged from Perrier water to Worms & Cie banking, from Cushman & Wakefield real estate to even a stake in Juventus's merchandising rights. Each deal carried Gianni's signature touch—negotiations conducted over long lunches at Turin's Del Cambio restaurant, sealed with a handshake and followed by headlines in La Stampa, the family newspaper.
The numbers tell one story—revenues growing from billions to tens of billions of lire, employees numbering in the hundreds of thousands, market capitalization expanding exponentially. But the real story was transformation. Under Gianni, the Agnelli empire evolved from an Italian industrial group into something unprecedented: a European answer to American conglomerates, but with distinctly Latin style. While General Electric under Jack Welch pursued ruthless efficiency, Agnelli built through relationships, aesthetics, and what Italians call bella figura—the art of making a good impression.
The complexity reached its apex by 2000 when Giovanni Agnelli e C. acquired 100% of IFI's ordinary shares, leaving only non-voting preference shares in public hands. This gave the family absolute control while maintaining market listing and liquidity. It was financial engineering of the highest order, allowing the Agnellis to have their cake and eat it—total control with public market benefits.
Yet beneath the glamour, problems festered. FIAT's auto division, the empire's cash engine, was losing ground to German and Japanese competitors. The company's passenger car market share in Europe fell from 15% in 1990 to under 10% by 2000. Attempts at international expansion—particularly the failed alliance with General Motors—drained resources without delivering promised synergies. By 2002, FIAT was losing €4 billion annually, its bonds rated junk, its survival questioned.
Gianni Agnelli's death in January 2003 marked not just the end of an era but a crisis of succession. His chosen heir, his nephew Giovanni Alberto, had died of cancer in 1997 at just 33. His son Edoardo had died by suicide in 2000. His brother Umberto, who assumed control, was already terminally ill with cancer. The empire that had seemed invincible suddenly appeared fragile, its complexity a liability rather than strength. The family fortune, built over a century, faced its greatest threat not from external competitors but from internal collapse.
As Umberto Agnelli took the reins for what everyone knew would be a brief transition, he made one crucial decision that would save the empire: he identified John Elkann, Gianni's grandson through his daughter Margherita, as the future leader. Just 28 years old, American-educated, and relatively unknown, Elkann represented a break from the past. The stage was set for either spectacular failure or dramatic transformation. What followed would be one of the great turnaround stories in European business.
IV. Crisis & Rebirth: The Fiat Turnaround & EXOR Creation (2003-2011)
Sergio Marchionne walked into FIAT's headquarters in Turin on June 1, 2004, wearing his signature black sweater and carrying a reputation as the toughest turnaround artist in European industry. The company he inherited was, by his own assessment, "a dead man walking." FIAT was burning through €5 million of cash daily, its factories operated at 60% capacity, and analysts openly speculated about bankruptcy. In the executive conference room, portraits of Giovanni and Gianni Agnelli gazed down as Marchionne delivered his first address to senior management: "We have 18 months to save this company. Anyone who doesn't believe we can do it should leave now."
The crisis had been building for years, but Gianni Agnelli's death in 2003 transformed a slow decline into an existential threat. His brother Umberto, already battling cancer, took control with grim determination. Despite his illness, Umberto made three decisions that would prove pivotal. First, he accelerated the succession planning, formally positioning his nephew John Elkann as the heir apparent. Second, he negotiated FIAT's exit from a disastrous put option agreement with General Motors that could have forced the Agnellis to sell FIAT to GM for a fraction of its value. Third, and most importantly, he recruited Marchionne from Swiss inspection company SGS.
Umberto Agnelli died in May 2004, just days before Marchionne officially started. The 28-year-old John Elkann suddenly found himself as the family's standard-bearer, chairman of IFIL, and de facto guardian of a century-old legacy teetering on collapse. Educated at Politecnico di Torino and Wharton, Elkann possessed intellectual credentials but zero operational experience. Critics dismissed him as a privileged heir out of his depth. The Italian press, never gentle with the Agnellis despite the family owning La Stampa, questioned whether this soft-spoken young man could handle Marchionne's volcanic personality and FIAT's existential crisis.
The Elkann-Marchionne partnership became one of business history's most unlikely success stories. Where previous FIAT CEOs had been courtiers who deferred to the family, Marchionne treated Elkann as a student who needed education in brutal business realities. Their weekly meetings became legendary—Marchionne chain-smoking, espresso cups accumulating, spreadsheets covering every surface as they dissected each division's performance. Elkann absorbed it all, asking increasingly sophisticated questions, challenging assumptions, but ultimately backing Marchionne's radical surgery.
That surgery was swift and merciless. Marchionne eliminated layers of management—FIAT had 12 reporting levels between factory workers and the CEO; he cut it to five. He shuttered underperforming plants, fired underperforming executives (including several Agnelli loyalists), and renegotiated union contracts that hadn't been touched in decades. The cultural transformation was equally dramatic. FIAT's headquarters, once a Byzantine court where executives spent more time managing internal politics than market competition, became a war room focused on daily cash flow, weekly market share data, and monthly profitability targets.
The financial engineering paralleled operational restructuring. In 2005, FIAT executed a €2 billion capital increase—the family participated, maintaining their stake despite the dilution risk. The General Motors put option, which could have destroyed family control, was settled for $2 billion in 2005, freeing FIAT from its most dangerous liability. By 2006, FIAT reported its first profit in four years. By 2007, it was generating over €2 billion in operating profit.
Meanwhile, Elkann orchestrated equally dramatic changes in the family holding structure. The byzantine architecture of IFI, IFIL, and IFINT had become a liability—too complex for investors to understand, too expensive to maintain, creating what analysts called an "opacity discount." On March 1, 2009, in the midst of the global financial crisis, IFIL merged with IFI to create EXOR S.p.A. The name itself signaled transformation—EXOR derived from "ex-or," Latin for "from the beginning," suggesting both historical continuity and fresh start.
The timing seemed insane. Lehman Brothers had collapsed six months earlier, credit markets were frozen, and auto sales had plummeted globally. Yet Elkann saw opportunity in crisis. The merger simplified the ownership structure, eliminated duplicate costs, and created a cleaner vehicle for future transactions. At the merger date, EXOR's NAV per share was just €12.95—a fraction of its historical peak. Critics called it rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic.
The creation of EXOR coincided with Marchionne's most audacious gambit: acquiring Chrysler. The American automaker had declared bankruptcy in April 2009, its survival dependent on U.S. government bailout. Marchionne proposed a partnership where FIAT would provide small-car technology and international distribution in exchange for equity—without paying cash FIAT didn't have. The Obama administration, desperate for any solution that preserved American jobs, agreed. FIAT initially took 20% of Chrysler, eventually building to full control by 2014.
On January 3, 2011, FIAT executed another strategic move, spinning off its industrial vehicles division into FIAT Industrial. This separated passenger cars (volatile, consumer-dependent) from trucks and agricultural equipment (stable, infrastructure-linked). EXOR became the largest shareholder in both entities. A month later, on February 11, 2011, John Elkann assumed the CEO role at EXOR while remaining chairman—a clear signal that the family vehicle, not the operating companies, would be his primary focus.
The transformation numbers were staggering. FIAT's market capitalization grew from €5 billion in 2004 to over €20 billion by 2011. The company that nearly died had acquired Chrysler, creating a global automotive group. EXOR's structure had been radically simplified, positioning it for the aggressive portfolio management that would define the next decade. Most remarkably, the Agnelli family maintained control throughout, their stake never falling below the critical threshold despite multiple capital raises and restructurings.
But perhaps the most important transformation was philosophical. Under Gianni Agnelli, the empire had been about accumulation—adding companies, expanding sectors, building complexity. Under Elkann and Marchionne, it became about focus and value creation. The question was no longer "what can we buy?" but "what should we own?" This shift would drive the next phase: the great unbundling that would unlock tens of billions in value through strategic separations and spin-offs.
V. The Great Restructuring: FCA, CNH Industrial & Ferrari Spin-off (2011-2016)
The boardroom at EXOR's Amsterdam headquarters was silent as John Elkann finished presenting his most radical proposal yet: spinning off Ferrari from FIAT Chrysler Automobiles. It was September 2014, and several board members looked stunned. Ferrari generated the highest margins in the automotive industry, its brand value was incalculable, and it had been the crown jewel of the Agnelli empire since 1969. One director finally spoke: "John, your grandfather spent years acquiring Ferrari. Why would we give it up now?" Elkann's response was simple: "Because keeping it is preventing both companies from reaching their full potential."
This exchange captured the revolutionary thinking that would define EXOR's great restructuring period. Between 2011 and 2016, Elkann and Marchionne orchestrated a series of separations, mergers, and spin-offs that fundamentally reimagined the Agnelli portfolio. Each move seemed to violate conventional wisdom about conglomerate advantages, yet collectively they unlocked value that had been trapped in corporate complexity for decades.
The restructuring began with industrial logic. On September 29, 2013, FIAT Industrial merged with its subsidiary CNH Global to create CNH Industrial N.V., consolidating agricultural equipment, construction machinery, and commercial vehicles under one roof. The merger eliminated dual holding structures, simplified reporting, and created the world's third-largest capital goods company. EXOR emerged as the dominant shareholder, but the real innovation was governance—the company was incorporated in the Netherlands, listed in New York and Milan, yet maintained operational headquarters in Turin. This multi-jurisdictional structure would become the template for future deals.
The creation of FIAT Chrysler Automobiles (FCA) in October 2014 represented Marchionne's vision reaching fruition. The company that FIAT had rescued from bankruptcy just five years earlier was now merged as an equal partner. The combined entity became the world's seventh-largest automaker, with iconic brands spanning from Maserati to Jeep, from Alfa Romeo to Ram trucks. Yet even as champagne flowed at the merger announcement, Elkann and Marchionne were planning their next move—one that would shock the automotive world.
The Ferrari spin-off decision reflected a sophisticated understanding of value creation that transcended traditional industrial thinking. Within FCA, Ferrari was undervalued—investors applied automotive multiples to what was actually a luxury goods company. Ferrari's ~€400 million in annual profit was buried within FCA's €15 billion revenue. Moreover, Ferrari's capital needs, business model, and growth trajectory bore no resemblance to mass-market automotive manufacturing. As Marchionne memorably put it: "Ferrari is not a car company. It's a luxury company that happens to make cars."
The execution was masterful in its complexity. First, in October 2015, FCA sold 9% of Ferrari through an IPO on the New York Stock Exchange, raising $982 million and establishing a public market valuation. The pricing—$52 per share—valued Ferrari at nearly $10 billion, already justifying the separation. Then, on January 4, 2016, FCA distributed its remaining 81% stake to shareholders through a tax-efficient spin-off. EXOR navigated this carefully, emerging with 23.5% of Ferrari's equity and 33.4% of voting rights through a dual-class structure.
Piero Ferrari, Enzo's son, retained his 10% stake with enhanced voting rights, and signed a shareholders' agreement with EXOR that ensured stable governance. This wasn't just financial engineering—it was relationship management at the highest level, honoring the original 1969 agreement while adapting to modern capital markets. The first day of independent trading saw Ferrari's market cap surge past €9 billion. Within a year, it would double.
The Dutch redomiciliation of EXOR itself, completed on December 11, 2016, was the final piece of the restructuring puzzle. Moving from Italy to the Netherlands wasn't about tax optimization—EXOR publicly committed to maintaining Italian tax residence. Instead, it was about corporate flexibility. Dutch law offered superior protection for dual-class shares, more efficient merger mechanics, and better alignment with EXOR's increasingly international portfolio. The move required approval from both Italian and Dutch authorities, navigation of EU regulations, and careful communication to avoid political backlash in Italy.
John Elkann's elevation to CEO while remaining chairman—a governance structure that would typically raise red flags—reflected the unique nature of a family-controlled holding company. He wasn't just managing a portfolio; he was stewarding a century-old legacy while executing radical transformation. His leadership style—analytical where Gianni had been instinctive, international where his predecessors were Italian-focused, strategic where they had been opportunistic—perfectly matched the moment.
The financial results validated the strategy. EXOR's NAV per share grew from €22.13 at the end of 2011 to €48.36 by December 2016—a 119% increase while the MSCI World Index grew just 44%. The Ferrari spin-off alone created over €10 billion in market value. CNH Industrial, freed from automotive association, saw its multiples expand. FCA, without Ferrari's capital intensity but with its cash flow, could invest in Jeep and Ram—its most profitable brands.
Yet the human dimension remained crucial. Sergio Marchionne, the architect of operational transformation, was simultaneously running FCA and Ferrari as CEO of both—a superhuman feat that couldn't last forever. The partnership with Elkann had evolved from teacher-student to genuine collaboration, with Elkann focusing on portfolio strategy while Marchionne drove operational excellence. Their weekly calls, conducted in a mixture of English, Italian, and occasionally French, became legendary for their intensity and breadth—covering everything from Chinese joint ventures to Formula 1 strategy.
The period also saw strategic disposals that demonstrated disciplined capital recycling. In 2013, EXOR sold its 15% stake in SGS for €2 billion, generating a €1.53 billion capital gain. The proceeds weren't hoarded but immediately redeployed into share buybacks and new investments. This wasn't the old European conglomerate mentality of eternal accumulation—it was dynamic portfolio management worthy of the best private equity firms.
As 2016 ended, EXOR had transformed from a complex Italian holding company into a streamlined, internationally-focused investment vehicle. The portfolio was cleaner: Stellantis for mass-market automotive, Ferrari for luxury, CNH Industrial for agricultural and construction equipment. The structure was simplified: one listed holding company with clear ownership stakes. The strategy was evident: own great companies, give them excellent governance, and separate them when independence creates value. The stage was set for the next act: a bold venture into insurance that would test Elkann's deal-making prowess on the global stage.
VI. The PartnerRe Gambit: Insurance Adventure (2015-2022)
The call came at 3 AM Amsterdam time. John Elkann was in his home office, having calculated that his counterpart in Bermuda would just be finishing dinner. "We'll go to $137.50 per share, all cash, but that's our final offer," Elkann said calmly. On the other end, the PartnerRe board's representative paused. AXIS Capital, their preferred merger partner, had offered $11 billion in stock. EXOR was now proposing $6.9 billion in cash—seemingly less, but without merger risk, regulatory approvals, or stock market volatility. "We'll need to discuss this with the board," came the response. Elkann hung up and walked to his window, watching the Amsterdam canals shimmer in the pre-dawn light. He had just bet one-third of EXOR's market value on a reinsurance company most of his shareholders had never heard of.
The PartnerRe acquisition saga began on April 14, 2015, with a seemingly routine press release. EXOR announced an unsolicited tender offer to acquire PartnerRe for $6.4 billion. The reinsurance market was puzzled—what was an automotive-focused holding company doing bidding for a Bermuda-based reinsurer? Even more puzzling was the competition: AXIS Capital had already announced a merger agreement with PartnerRe in January, a deal that made perfect strategic sense as both were reinsurers seeking scale.
But Elkann saw something others missed. The reinsurance industry in 2015 was at an inflection point. Alternative capital from pension funds and sovereign wealth funds was flooding the market, compressing margins. Traditional players were consolidating desperately. Most importantly, reinsurance was the ultimate uncorrelated asset—its returns dependent on hurricanes and earthquakes, not economic cycles or consumer sentiment. For a portfolio heavy with automotive exposure, reinsurance offered true diversification.
The public battle that ensued was unprecedented in the genteel world of reinsurance. AXIS CEO Albert Benchimol accused EXOR of trying to "steal" PartnerRe. PartnerRe's board initially rejected EXOR's offer, citing the strategic benefits of the AXIS merger. Proxy advisors ISS and Glass Lewis sided with AXIS. The financial media portrayed Elkann as an inexperienced heir overreaching into an industry he didn't understand.
EXOR's response was methodical and relentless. They raised their offer to $130 per share, then $137.50. They published detailed presentations explaining how PartnerRe would benefit from patient, permanent capital rather than another merger-of-equals. Most cleverly, they exploited a technicality in Bermuda law that allowed shareholders to vote down the AXIS merger without voting for EXOR—creating a "neither" option that broke the stalemate.
The turning point came in July 2015 when PartnerRe shareholders, led by activist investors, began publicly questioning the AXIS deal. The promised synergies seemed optimistic, the integration risks substantial, and EXOR's all-cash offer increasingly attractive as market volatility grew. On August 3, 2015, PartnerRe's board capitulated, signing a definitive agreement with EXOR for $6.9 billion. The acquisition closed on March 18, 2016.
What EXOR acquired was fascinating: a 23-year-old reinsurer with $6 billion in premiums, operations in every major market, and specialized expertise in life, health, and catastrophe coverage. PartnerRe wasn't just any reinsurer—it was known for sophisticated risk modeling, conservative underwriting, and strong relationships with primary insurers globally. The company culture—analytical, international, meritocratic—meshed surprisingly well with EXOR's evolution under Elkann.
The integration strategy defied private equity convention. Rather than loading PartnerRe with debt or slashing costs, EXOR provided patient capital and strategic support. They retained CEO Emmanuel Clarke and most senior management, adding only a few board members. The message was clear: EXOR would be a strategic owner, not an operator. This hands-off approach initially puzzled analysts accustomed to aggressive post-acquisition restructuring.
The strategy proved prescient. Under EXOR's ownership, PartnerRe could make long-term underwriting decisions without quarterly earnings pressure. When competitors chased market share by loosening underwriting standards, PartnerRe maintained discipline. When alternative capital providers offered pricing below sustainable levels, PartnerRe walked away from business. The company's combined ratio—claims and expenses divided by premiums—consistently outperformed peers.
Then came the plot twist nobody expected. In March 2020, as COVID-19 paralyzed global markets, French mutual insurer Covéa approached EXOR about acquiring PartnerRe. The initial offer—$9 billion—represented a 30% premium to EXOR's acquisition price after just four years of ownership. But as negotiations progressed through the pandemic, disputes arose over COVID-related losses and warranty terms. In May 2020, the deal collapsed acrimoniously, with both sides trading accusations.
Rather than panic, Elkann saw opportunity. The failed sale had revealed PartnerRe's strategic value—even during a global pandemic, buyers would pay premium prices. EXOR doubled down, providing additional capital for PartnerRe to exploit market dislocations. As competitors retrenched, PartnerRe selectively expanded, particularly in specialty lines and emerging markets. The pandemic, rather than destroying value, created opportunities for disciplined underwriters.
The eventual exit was even more dramatic than the acquisition. In December 2021, Covéa returned with a renewed offer. This time, negotiations were swift and professional. The purchase price: $9.0 billion in cash, split between $4.815 billion in USD and €3.847 billion in euros. The transaction closed in July 2022, generating a total return exceeding 45% including dividends—roughly $2 billion in profit.
The PartnerRe adventure revealed multiple dimensions of EXOR's evolution. First, it demonstrated Elkann's ability to execute complex, contested acquisitions against sophisticated competition. Second, it showed EXOR's capacity to own and oversee businesses far from its automotive heritage. Third, it validated the patient capital model—by not forcing immediate synergies or restructuring, EXOR allowed PartnerRe to compound value naturally.
The financial engineering was equally sophisticated. EXOR funded the acquisition through a combination of existing cash, asset sales (including the SGS stake), and a €750 million bond issue. The structure preserved the holding company's financial flexibility while taking on a massive acquisition. The exit proceeds—$9 billion—would fund the next phase of portfolio transformation, including increased stakes in healthcare and technology.
Most importantly, the PartnerRe chapter established EXOR's credibility beyond European industrial circles. Successfully competing against specialized financial buyers, managing a complex regulated institution, and executing a profitable exit at scale proved EXOR had evolved from a family holding company into a sophisticated global investment vehicle. The question now wasn't whether EXOR could execute complex transactions, but what it would buy next with its war chest of PartnerRe proceeds.
VII. The Stellantis Mega-Merger & Modern Portfolio (2021-Present)
Carlos Tavares stood at the podium in Amsterdam on January 16, 2021, flanked by John Elkann and the Peugeot family representatives. Outside, snow blanketed the city in unusual silence—COVID-19 lockdowns had emptied the streets. Inside, history was being made. "Today," Tavares announced, "Stellantis is born—the world's fourth-largest automaker by volume, third-largest by revenue." The merger of Fiat Chrysler Automobiles with France's Groupe PSA had created a €150 billion colossus with 14 brands, 400,000 employees, and the scale to compete with Volkswagen, Toyota, and the emerging Chinese giants. For EXOR, now the single largest shareholder with 14.4% of equity, it was the culmination of Marchionne's vision and the beginning of an entirely new chapter. The merger itself was a masterpiece of financial and diplomatic engineering. Unlike typical automotive mergers driven by desperation—think Daimler-Chrysler or BMW-Rover—Stellantis combined two profitable, complementary companies at the peak of their powers. The merger was completed on January 16, 2021, with shares beginning to trade under the symbol "STLA" on January 18 on the Milan Stock Exchange and Euronext Paris, and January 19 on the New York Stock Exchange. EXOR emerged owning 449,410,092 common shares of Stellantis, corresponding to 14.4% of its outstanding capital, making it the single largest shareholder ahead of the Peugeot family (7%) and the French state (6%).
The genius of the deal structure lay in its balance. Though billed as a "merger of equals" with 50-50 ownership split, PSA was designated the acquirer for accounting purposes, and Carlos Tavares, the CEO of PSA Group, was appointed CEO of Stellantis with a five-year term. Yet John Elkann became chairman, ensuring Agnelli family influence at the highest level. This wasn't capitulation—it was strategic positioning. Elkann recognized that Tavares, who had transformed PSA from near-bankruptcy to industry-leading margins, was the operational leader Stellantis needed.
The industrial logic was compelling. FCA brought Jeep and Ram, profit machines in North America, plus Latin American dominance through Fiat. PSA contributed European strength through Peugeot and Citroën, plus the recently acquired Opel from General Motors. Together, they achieved the scale necessary for electric vehicle investments, autonomous driving development, and software capabilities that neither could afford alone. The projected annual synergies of €5 billion weren't just cost cuts but revenue opportunities through platform sharing and technology transfer.
But EXOR's portfolio transformation during this period extended far beyond automotive consolidation. On January 1, 2022, another strategic separation occurred when CNH Industrial executed a spin-off of its on-highway activities, creating Iveco Group N.V., with EXOR becoming the leading shareholder with a 27% stake and 42% of voting rights. This split separated agricultural/construction equipment (stable, high-margin) from commercial vehicles (cyclical, capital-intensive), allowing each to pursue focused strategies and appropriate capital structures. The healthcare pivot crystallized in August 2023 when EXOR stunned markets by acquiring a 15% stake in Philips for approximately €2.6 billion ($2.8 billion). The investment made EXOR the largest shareholder in the Dutch health technology giant, executed through a sophisticated derivatives structure involving Goldman Sachs that allowed accumulation without triggering normal disclosure requirements. The timing seemed counterintuitive—Philips was still grappling with a huge product recall dating back to 2021, its share price down over 60% from pre-recall levels.
But Elkann saw what others missed. As he commented: "The path of change taken by Philips in recent years has created a company that combines two areas – healthcare and technology"—precisely the sectors EXOR had identified for future growth. The stake has since been increased to 18.7% according to SEC filings, making EXOR the top investor in the Dutch maker of products ranging from medical imaging systems to toothbrushes. This wasn't just financial investment but strategic positioning in the €10 trillion global healthcare market. In May 2023, EXOR launched Lingotto, an independent alternative investment manager wholly owned by EXOR but open to capital from other investors. The initial capital was around €2 billion, provided by EXOR and Covéa (the French insurer who had tried to buy PartnerRe). Established in 2023, Lingotto was conceived as a platform for multiple investment strategies, each led by a Managing Partner and Chief Investment Officer.
The Lingotto launch represented another evolution in EXOR's strategy—from direct ownership to professional asset management. The team assembled was world-class: former EXOR CFO Enrico Vellano as CEO, George Osborne (former UK Chancellor) as non-executive chairman, and most notably, James Anderson, the legendary Baillie Gifford investor who had backed Tesla, Amazon, and other technology giants through Scottish Mortgage Trust. The structure allowed EXOR to leverage its capital alongside external investors while building institutional investment capabilities. Most dramatically, on July 30, 2025, EXOR announced the sale of its entire Iveco Group stake to Tata Motors for €3.8 billion. The transaction, structured as an all-cash voluntary tender offer at €14.1 per share, valued Iveco Group at approximately €3.8 billion. EXOR, holding approximately 27.06% of Iveco's common shares and 43.11% of voting rights, irrevocably committed to tender its shareholding. The deal marked the end of EXOR's involvement in commercial vehicles, a business that had been separated from CNH Industrial just three years earlier.
The Iveco sale encapsulated EXOR's modern approach: patient ownership, value creation through separation, and strategic exit when better owners emerge. Tata Motors offered industrial logic—combining Iveco's European strength with Tata's Asian dominance to create a global commercial vehicle champion. For EXOR, the proceeds would fund further investments in higher-growth, higher-margin sectors aligned with its evolving portfolio strategy.
The current portfolio composition reflects this strategic evolution. As of December 31, 2024, EXOR's key holdings include Ferrari (19.5% economic rights, 32.1% voting rights), Stellantis (15.5% economic rights, 24.0% voting rights), Philips (17.5% economic rights, 17.8% voting rights), and CNH Industrial (26.9% economic rights, 45.3% voting rights). The voting rights premium—achieved through dual-class structures and loyalty shares—ensures family control despite minority economic stakes.
Recent market performance has been mixed but revealing. Stellantis faces challenges transitioning to electric vehicles while maintaining profitability. Ferrari continues its luxury trajectory, with waiting lists stretching years and prices that seem immune to economic cycles. Philips recovery from its product recall issues validates EXOR's contrarian investment thesis. CNH Industrial benefits from agricultural mechanization trends and infrastructure spending globally.
The transformation from industrial conglomerate to sophisticated investment vehicle is complete. EXOR today manages not just a portfolio but an ecosystem—direct holdings, venture investments through Exor Ventures, professional asset management through Lingotto, and strategic partnerships globally. The question isn't whether EXOR has successfully evolved from its FIAT roots, but rather what it will become next as John Elkann continues to reshape the Agnelli legacy for the 21st century.
VIII. Key Inflection Points & Strategic Pivots
The morning of March 1, 2009, marked EXOR's birth from the merger of IFI and IFIL, but the real story wasn't the corporate reorganization—it was the timing. Lehman Brothers had collapsed six months earlier, credit markets were frozen, and European banks were failing weekly. Most family offices were hunkering down, preserving capital, avoiding bold moves. John Elkann did the opposite, using the crisis to execute the most important structural simplification in the Agnelli empire's history. The new entity's NAV per share stood at just €12.95, a fraction of its components' historical peaks. Critics called it rearranging deck chairs. History would prove it was laying the foundation for one of Europe's great investment success stories.
2009 EXOR Formation: The Great Simplification
The merger that created EXOR eliminated decades of accumulated complexity. IFI had controlled IFIL, which controlled various operating companies, while IFINT handled international investments—a structure that made Kremlinology look straightforward. Post-merger, one entity—EXOR—held all investments directly. This wasn't just administrative tidiness; it fundamentally changed how the market valued the Agnelli holdings. The old structure's opacity had created a "complexity discount" estimated at 20-30%. EXOR's transparency began closing that gap immediately.
More importantly, the simplified structure enabled rapid decision-making. When opportunities arose—like Chrysler in 2009 or PartnerRe in 2015—EXOR could move without navigating multiple boards and holding companies. The merger also reduced costs by approximately €15 million annually, funds that could be redeployed into investments. But the masterstroke was timing: executing during the financial crisis meant minimal tax consequences and regulatory scrutiny, as authorities had bigger problems than Italian holding company reorganizations.
2011 Fiat Industrial Spin-off: The Unbundling Begins
The January 2011 separation of FIAT Industrial from FIAT marked a philosophical shift from conglomerate building to focused value creation. The logic was compelling: why should passenger car volatility affect agricultural equipment valuations? Why should truck manufacturers trade at automotive multiples? The spin-off created two pure-play companies, each with appropriate capital structures and investor bases.
The execution demonstrated sophisticated financial engineering. Rather than a taxable sale, the spin-off was structured as a tax-free distribution to shareholders. EXOR maintained its ownership percentage in both entities while unlocking approximately €3 billion in market value within months. The separated companies could pursue independent strategies—FIAT focusing on the Chrysler integration, FIAT Industrial on global agricultural markets. This wasn't empire dismantling but empire optimization.
2013 SGS Sale: Disciplined Capital Recycling
EXOR's sale of its 15% stake in Swiss inspection company SGS for €2 billion, generating a €1.53 billion capital gain, exemplified the new EXOR's approach to portfolio management. SGS was a quality asset—stable, profitable, with excellent long-term prospects. The old Agnelli philosophy would have held it forever. But Elkann recognized that SGS's steady 8-10% annual returns couldn't match opportunities elsewhere.
The timing was exquisite. SGS traded at historical highs, inspection services were being commoditized by technology, and EXOR needed capital for the Ferrari separation and PartnerRe acquisition. The sale proceeds weren't hoarded but immediately redeployed—funding share buybacks when EXOR traded at discounts to NAV, providing dry powder for opportunistic investments. This active portfolio management distinguished EXOR from passive family holding companies.
2016 Ferrari Independence: The Crown Jewel Flies Free
The Ferrari spin-off seemed like corporate sacrilege. Since 1969, Ferrari had been the Agnelli empire's most prestigious asset, the ultimate expression of Italian excellence. Financial logic suggested keeping it—Ferrari generated automotive industry's highest margins, faced no real competition, and provided invaluable brand halo to FIAT. Yet Elkann and Marchionne recognized a deeper truth: Ferrari's potential was constrained within FCA.
Inside FCA, Ferrari received automotive multiples despite being essentially a luxury goods company. Its capital allocation competed with mass-market brands' needs. Its management reported through automotive hierarchies. Post-spin-off, Ferrari could pursue its own strategy—limiting production to maintain exclusivity, expanding into luxury experiences, commanding luxury valuations. The stock price vindication was immediate: Ferrari's market cap doubled within eighteen months, creating more value than many thought the entire FCA was worth.
2018 Marchionne's Death: Crisis Management Excellence
Upon learning of Sergio Marchionne's irrevocable health conditions on July 21, 2018, EXOR led efforts to replace him in all group companies in which he was involved. The legendary CEO, who had saved FIAT and built FCA, was suddenly incapacitated by complications from surgery. Within 48 hours, EXOR orchestrated seamless leadership transitions across multiple companies: Mike Manley at FCA, John Elkann himself as Ferrari's executive chairman (with Louis Camilleri as CEO), and Suzanne Heywood at CNH Industrial.
The swift, decisive response prevented market panic and organizational paralysis. EXOR's ability to immediately install capable leadership—without power struggles or uncertainty—demonstrated the value of active, engaged ownership. Share prices initially dropped but quickly recovered as markets recognized continuity. The crisis also accelerated EXOR's evolution from operating company oversight to portfolio company governance, with Elkann focusing on strategy rather than operations.
2021 Stellantis Creation: Consolidation at Scale
The Stellantis merger represented the culmination of Marchionne's vision and Elkann's execution. By virtue of the merger, EXOR owned 449,410,092 common shares of Stellantis, corresponding to 14.4% of its outstanding capital, making it the single largest shareholder. This wasn't a desperate combination of weakness—both FCA and PSA were profitable—but a strategic merger creating scale for electric vehicle investments and autonomous driving development.
The structure was masterful: a "merger of equals" that preserved both sides' dignity while achieving integration benefits. EXOR's stake decreased from roughly 29% of FCA to 14.4% of Stellantis, but the absolute value increased as merger synergies materialized. Critically, Elkann became chairman while Carlos Tavares, PSA's operations-focused CEO, ran the company. This governance structure—family strategic oversight with professional management execution—became EXOR's template across portfolio companies.
2022 PartnerRe Exit: Patient Capital Vindicated
The July 2022 sale of PartnerRe to Covéa for $9.0 billion validated EXOR's patient capital model. After the dramatic 2015 acquisition battle, EXOR had held PartnerRe through soft reinsurance markets, COVID-19 losses, and a failed 2020 sale attempt. Lesser owners might have panicked, cut costs, or forced strategic changes. EXOR did the opposite—providing capital for opportunistic underwriting, maintaining management stability, allowing long-term value creation.
The exit timing was optimal. Reinsurance markets were hardening post-COVID, climate change increased demand for catastrophe coverage, and alternative capital was retreating. The $9 billion sale price represented a 45% return including dividends—exceptional for a six-year hold in a mature industry. The proceeds provided EXOR with ammunition for its next phase: healthcare, technology, and luxury investments aligned with 21st-century megatrends.
These inflection points reveal consistent patterns in EXOR's strategic evolution. First, timing matters more than assets—executing restructurings during crises, selling at peaks, buying during pessimism. Second, simplicity creates value—eliminating complexity discounts, enabling faster decisions, reducing costs. Third, strategic separations unlock value—allowing businesses to find natural owners and appropriate valuations. Fourth, active ownership beats passive holding—recycling capital from mature assets to higher-growth opportunities. Finally, family control with professional management works—maintaining long-term perspective while accessing world-class execution.
The cumulative impact has been transformative. EXOR's NAV per share grew from €12.95 at formation to over €160 by 2024—a twelve-fold increase while the MSCI World Index merely tripled. This wasn't luck or market beta but deliberate, disciplined capital allocation. Each pivot built on previous moves, creating compounding advantages. The question now isn't whether EXOR can execute complex transactions—that's proven—but which sectors and strategies will define its next decade of value creation.
IX. The Elkann Playbook: Business & Investing Lessons
John Elkann doesn't do interviews about investment philosophy. Unlike Warren Buffett's folksy annual letters or Carl Icahn's CNBC appearances, Elkann operates with Swiss watch precision and Italian discretion. Yet by reverse-engineering EXOR's moves over his tenure, a sophisticated playbook emerges—one that combines family dynasty management with modern financial engineering, European industrial heritage with Silicon Valley disruption thinking. The lessons aren't just academic; they represent billions in value creation and destruction avoided.
Family Control with Public Market Discipline
The fundamental tension in family-controlled public companies is obvious: families want control, public markets want liquidity and governance. Most resolve this through dual-class shares that eventually attract governance criticism and valuation discounts. EXOR's solution is more elegant—multiple layers of control that maintain family dominance while respecting minority shareholders.
At the top sits Giovanni Agnelli BV, the family vehicle that holds 56.9% of EXOR's outstanding capital but 86.0% of voting rights through loyalty shares that double voting power after two years of ownership. This isn't the crude dual-class structure that Google or Facebook employ; it's a reward system for long-term shareholders that happens to benefit the family most. Below EXOR, similar structures cascade—Ferrari's loyalty shares, Stellantis's special voting rights, CNH Industrial's dual-class stock.
The brilliance lies in execution. EXOR treats public shareholders as partners, not nuisances. Disclosure is comprehensive, governance is professional (independent directors aren't family friends), and capital allocation is disciplined. When EXOR trades below NAV, they buy back shares. When assets are overvalued, they sell. This alignment creates a virtuous circle: good governance attracts institutional investors, liquidity improves, valuation discounts narrow, creating currency for acquisitions.
The Art of Strategic Breakups and Spin-offs
While American conglomerates like General Electric spent decades building complexity, EXOR spent the 2010s systematically dismantling it. But this wasn't activist-driven breakup for breakup's sake. Each separation followed a pattern: identify value trapped by structural misalignment, execute tax-efficient separation, maintain strategic stakes in separated entities, redeploy proceeds into higher-return opportunities.
The Ferrari spin-off template is instructive. First, establish independent valuation through partial IPO (9% in October 2015). Second, distribute remaining shares tax-efficiently to existing shareholders. Third, maintain influence through voting agreements and board representation. Fourth, let independent market dynamics drive value creation. Ferrari's market cap has increased six-fold since independence—value that was literally impossible to achieve within FCA.
The lesson extends beyond execution mechanics. Strategic breakups require psychological fortitude—admitting that ownership synergies don't exist, accepting reduced control, trusting markets to properly value assets. Most empire builders can't do this; their egos are invested in size and complexity. Elkann's ego seems invested in NAV per share, a far more productive metric.
Long-term Thinking vs. Opportunistic Exits
EXOR's holding periods reveal strategic patience punctuated by tactical aggression. Ferrari has been held since 1969 (over 50 years), Juventus since 1923 (over 100 years), CNH/Case since 1999 (25 years). Yet when logic dictates, exits are swift and complete— SGS sold after 30 years for €2 billion, PartnerRe after just six years for $9 billion, Iveco after three years as an independent company for €3.8 billion.
The pattern suggests a nuanced philosophy: hold assets that compound value through competitive advantages, exit assets that merely generate returns. Ferrari compounds through brand value that strengthens annually. Juventus compounds through cultural significance that deepens generationally. But SGS's inspection services and PartnerRe's reinsurance were fundamentally commoditizing—profitable today but vulnerable tomorrow. The discipline to distinguish between compounders and returners, then act accordingly, separates great capital allocators from merely good ones.
Building "Great Companies" Philosophy
Elkann's repeated invocation of building "great companies" sounds like generic corporate speak until you examine implementation. Great companies, in EXOR's definition, combine sustainable competitive advantages, aligned management, appropriate capital structures, and societal purpose. This isn't ESG window-dressing but hard-nosed business logic—great companies attract better talent, command premium valuations, and survive disruptions.
The Philips investment exemplifies this philosophy. When EXOR invested €2.6 billion in August 2023, Philips was a "broken" company—product recalls, management turmoil, collapsed share price. But underneath lay great company potential: critical healthcare technology, global distribution, innovation capabilities. EXOR provided patient capital and strategic support, betting that operational problems were fixable while competitive advantages remained intact.
This philosophy drives governance approach across portfolio companies. EXOR doesn't parachute in executives or mandate strategies. Instead, they ensure excellent boards, align management incentives, provide strategic counsel, then step back. The results speak: Ferrari's capital discipline, Stellantis's merger integration, CNH's margin expansion all reflect management excellence enabled by ownership stability.
Managing Complexity: From Conglomerate to Focused Holdings
The evolution from IFI/IFIL's byzantine structure to EXOR's streamlined holdings wasn't just organizational housekeeping—it was philosophical revolution. The old structure reflected 20th-century European capitalism: cross-holdings for control, opacity for flexibility, complexity as competitive moat. The new structure reflects 21st-century realities: transparency drives valuation, simplicity enables speed, focus creates accountability.
Today's EXOR portfolio has clear logic: luxury (Ferrari), automotive (Stellantis), healthcare (Philips), agriculture/construction (CNH). Lingotto, established in 2023, provides professional asset management capabilities. Exor Ventures offers exposure to early-stage innovation. Each piece has defined role, performance metrics, and strategic rationale. This isn't the random accumulation that characterized old European holding companies but deliberate portfolio construction.
The complexity that remains—dual-class shares, loyalty voting, cross-border structures—serves specific purposes rather than historical accident. Dutch domicile provides flexibility, loyalty shares reward long-term holders, dual-class structures preserve family control. Modern complexity is engineered, not inherited.
Capital Allocation Excellence: Recycling Proceeds into New Opportunities
EXOR's capital allocation record deserves business school study. Between major asset sales generating €1.5 billion in 2024 alone, EXOR has created a perpetual motion machine of value creation: buy undervalued or mismanaged assets, improve governance and strategy, separate or sell at premium valuations, redeploy proceeds into new opportunities, repeat.
The PartnerRe proceeds exemplify this recycling. The $9 billion wasn't returned to shareholders through special dividends or wasted on vanity acquisitions. Instead, it funded the Philips investment (healthcare exposure), Lingotto launch (asset management capabilities), share buybacks (NAV per share accretion), and balance sheet strengthening (financial flexibility). Each use of proceeds positioned EXOR for future value creation rather than current consumption.
This disciplined recycling distinguishes EXOR from both traditional conglomerates (which rarely sell anything) and private equity (which must return capital after exits). EXOR operates as permanent capital vehicle with private equity discipline—the best of both models.
The Dual-Class Share Structure Mastery
While dual-class shares attract governance criticism globally, EXOR has engineered structures that maintain control while minimizing controversy. The key innovation is loyalty shares—available to any shareholder who holds for the required period, not just the family. This transforms a governance negative (family privilege) into a positive (long-term alignment).
The cascading structure—family company controls EXOR, EXOR controls operating companies—creates multiple defensive layers. Hostile takeovers are practically impossible, yet the structure doesn't prevent strategic transactions. When logic dictated selling PartnerRe or merging with PSA, the structure enabled rather than prevented value creation. This balance—control without entrenchment—represents sophisticated governance engineering.
The Elkann playbook ultimately reveals a modern approach to dynastic wealth management. Rather than passive preservation, it emphasizes active value creation. Rather than emotional attachment to assets, it demonstrates ruthless rationality about capital allocation. Rather than family privilege, it delivers professional excellence. The results—NAV per share growing from €12.95 to over €160 in fifteen years—suggest the playbook works. The question isn't whether others will copy it, but whether they possess the discipline, patience, and capability to execute it.
X. Analysis & Bear vs. Bull Case
The investment case for EXOR splits the European financial community into two camps with almost religious fervor. Bulls see it as Europe's Berkshire Hathaway—a sophisticated capital allocator trading at an inexplicable discount to intrinsic value. Bears see an old-world conglomerate dressed in modern clothing, vulnerable to automotive disruption, family drama, and structural governance issues. The truth, as always, lies somewhere between, but the stakes—with over €38 billion in net asset value—make this more than an academic debate.
Bull Case: The Ferrari Crown Jewel and Beyond
The bull thesis starts with simple math. EXOR's NAV reached €38.2 billion at December 31, 2024, yet the market cap hovers around €18-20 billion—a discount exceeding 45%. This isn't some obscure holding company with illiquid assets; the portfolio consists primarily of listed companies with transparent market values. Ferrari alone, where EXOR holds 19.5% economic interest, trades at a market cap exceeding €75 billion, making EXOR's stake worth approximately €15 billion—nearly EXOR's entire market cap.
Ferrari represents the ultimate trophy asset—a luxury brand that happens to make cars, with waiting lists stretching years and pricing power that defies economic gravity. The company's trajectory seems almost supernatural: expanding from pure sports cars into luxury experiences, branded merchandise, and entertainment while maintaining exclusivity. With operating margins exceeding 25% and returns on capital that make software companies envious, Ferrari alone might justify EXOR's valuation.
Stellantis, despite current challenges, offers massive optionality. As the world's fourth-largest automaker with strong positions in profitable segments (Jeep, Ram trucks), even modest success in electric vehicle transition could drive significant value. The company's €15 billion net cash position provides cushion for transformation investments. At current valuations, the market essentially assigns zero value to Stellantis's future—any positive surprise creates upside.
The Philips investment showcases EXOR's contrarian value creation. Acquired for €2.6-2.8 billion when the company was in crisis, EXOR now holds approximately 18.7% after increasing its initial 15% stake. With Philips recovering from its product recall issues and healthcare technology demand growing, the investment could double within five years. The pattern—buying quality companies during distress—has worked repeatedly for EXOR.
CNH Industrial provides stability and cash flow. As the world's third-largest agricultural equipment manufacturer, it benefits from secular trends: growing food demand, farm consolidation, precision agriculture adoption. With 27% economic ownership and 45% voting control, EXOR captures significant value from a business that generates steady returns through cycles.
Beyond individual holdings, bulls emphasize EXOR's capital allocation track record. NAV per share has compounded at approximately 18% annually since 2009, dramatically outperforming European indices. The management team, led by John Elkann, has demonstrated ability to execute complex transactions, time exits optimally, and redeploy capital effectively. The recently announced €1 billion share buyback program, structured as a tender offer with up to 10% premium, signals confidence and should accelerate NAV per share growth.
The structural setup favors long-term value creation. Family control ensures patient capital and strategic consistency. The simplified structure post-2016 Dutch redomiciliation enables faster decision-making. The launch of Lingotto adds asset management capabilities that could generate fee income beyond traditional holdings. Geography provides advantage—European assets remain cheaper than American equivalents despite similar quality.
Bear Case: Automotive Disruption and Structural Challenges
The bear thesis begins with automotive exposure. Between Stellantis, Ferrari, and CNH Industrial, over 60% of NAV relates to industries facing existential disruption. Electric vehicles, autonomous driving, and mobility-as-a-service threaten traditional automotive economics. Tesla's market cap exceeding most traditional automakers combined suggests markets believe disruption is inevitable. Even Ferrari, despite its brand strength, must navigate electrification without losing its emotional appeal.
Stellantis faces particular challenges. The merger synergies are materializing slower than promised, market share is declining in key regions, and the electric vehicle transition requires massive investment with uncertain returns. Chinese manufacturers like BYD are attacking European markets with competitive products and aggressive pricing. The departure of CEO Carlos Tavares earlier than planned raises succession concerns. At minimum, Stellantis represents dead money for years; at worst, it could require capital injection.
The conglomerate discount appears permanent. Despite EXOR's simplification efforts, markets still struggle to value holding companies. The structure—a Netherlands-domiciled company controlling Italian, American, and Dutch operating companies—creates complexity that algorithms and ETFs avoid. The family control, while providing stability, limits takeover potential that might close valuation gaps. History suggests holding company discounts persist regardless of performance.
Governance concerns persist despite improvements. The concentration of power in John Elkann—Chairman and CEO of EXOR, Chairman of Stellantis and Ferrari—raises key person risk. The broader Agnelli family dynamics, while currently stable, could deteriorate as next generation members mature. Italian corporate governance, despite reforms, still favors controlling shareholders over minorities. The loyalty share structures, while legal, effectively entrench family control permanently.
Capital allocation mistakes could destroy value. The PartnerRe adventure, while ultimately profitable, tied up capital for six years in a volatile industry. The Philips investment, made when the company faced serious challenges, could deteriorate if healthcare technology spending slows. The luxury and technology focus sounds strategic but might simply chase momentum into overvalued sectors. EXOR's track record, while strong, doesn't guarantee future success.
European macro challenges compound company-specific issues. Italy's structural problems—aging population, high debt, low growth—limit domestic opportunities. European regulatory environment increasingly restricts automotive emissions, financial engineering, and cross-border transactions. The EU's strategic autonomy push might limit global expansion options. Currency exposure—euros, dollars, and emerging market currencies—creates translation volatility.
NAV Discount Analysis and Market Perception
The persistent NAV discount demands deeper analysis. Holding company discounts typically range from 15-30% globally, reflecting control limitations, operating costs, and complexity. EXOR's 45% discount exceeds normal ranges, suggesting either exceptional opportunity or unrecognized risks.
Several factors explain the extreme discount. First, automotive exposure during industry transition creates uncertainty that markets hate. Second, the Italian/European association carries sovereign risk premium despite Dutch domicile. Third, limited liquidity—daily trading volumes average just €10-15 million—restricts institutional investment. Fourth, the complex voting structures deter governance-focused investors. Fifth, lack of sell-side coverage means fewer analysts explaining the story.
Market perception reflects these concerns. EXOR trades like an automotive holding company despite portfolio diversification. The family control narrative overshadows professional management reality. The European label implies low growth despite global operations. The conglomerate structure suggests inefficiency despite active portfolio management. These perception gaps create opportunity if reality diverges from narrative.
Competitive Positioning vs. Other European Holding Companies
Compared to European peers, EXOR stands out positively and negatively. Investor AB, the Swedish Wallenberg family vehicle, trades at a 20% NAV discount with similar family control but better liquidity. Groupe Bruxelles Lambert, Belgium's Albert Frère legacy vehicle, trades at a 25% discount with more diversification but less iconic assets. Wendel, the French holding company, trades at a 35% discount with comparable complexity but weaker track record.
EXOR's advantages include trophy assets (Ferrari), proven capital allocation, and successful restructuring history. Disadvantages include automotive concentration, Italian perception, and complex structures. The peer comparison suggests EXOR's discount is excessive but not without precedent. Catalysts for re-rating include successful Stellantis transformation, Philips recovery validation, or strategic simplification.
Future Acquisition Capacity Post-PartnerRe Sale
With $9 billion in PartnerRe proceeds and minimal debt, EXOR possesses significant acquisition capacity. Assuming 50% debt financing for major acquisitions, EXOR could deploy $15-20 billion—enough for transformational deals. The Lingotto platform enables co-investment structures that multiply firepower. The family's patient capital reputation attracts sellers seeking stable ownership.
Potential targets likely span healthcare, luxury, and technology—sectors offering growth, margins, and disruption resistance. Healthcare technology beyond Philips could include medical devices, diagnostics, or digital health platforms. Luxury beyond Ferrari might encompass fashion, hospitality, or experiences. Technology could mean software, semiconductors, or enabling platforms. The discipline shown in recent acquisitions suggests EXOR won't overpay for growth.
The balanced assessment suggests EXOR represents a complex but compelling opportunity. The NAV discount appears excessive given asset quality and management track record. The automotive exposure creates near-term headwinds but isn't necessarily terminal. The family control ensures stability but limits catalysts. For patient investors who believe in European recovery, luxury resilience, and healthcare growth, EXOR offers discounted exposure to world-class assets. For those fearing automotive disruption, governance issues, or European stagnation, the discount might prove justified. The truth likely lies between extremes—EXOR neither deserves Berkshire multiples nor bankruptcy risk pricing, but rather recognition as a sophisticated investment vehicle navigating industrial transition with reasonable success probability.
XI. Recent Developments & Future Vision
The boardroom on the 23rd floor of EXOR's Amsterdam headquarters buzzes with an energy that belies its minimalist Dutch design. It's March 2025, and John Elkann is conducting what insiders call the "portfolio review"—a quarterly deep dive that would make most private equity partners nervous. On the walls, real-time dashboards display everything from Ferrari's order backlog to Philips' product pipeline, from Stellantis' EV sales to CNH's precision agriculture adoption rates. This isn't passive ownership; it's active portfolio management at institutional scale.
Current Portfolio Composition and Voting Rights
EXOR's portfolio at December 31, 2024, presents a carefully orchestrated balance: Ferrari (19.5% economic rights, 32.1% voting rights), Stellantis (15.5% economic rights, 24.0% voting rights), Philips (17.5% economic rights, 17.8% voting rights), and CNH Industrial (26.9% economic rights, 45.3% voting rights). The voting rights premium—achieved through loyalty shares and dual-class structures—ensures strategic influence despite minority economic stakes.
This isn't random accumulation but deliberate portfolio construction. Ferrari represents luxury and brand power. Stellantis provides automotive scale and transformation optionality. Philips offers healthcare technology exposure. CNH captures agricultural mechanization trends. Each position was built methodically—Ferrari through decades of ownership, Stellantis through merger participation, Philips through contrarian investment, CNH through strategic patience.
The portfolio's geographic diversification spans continents: Ferrari's largest markets are Americas and Asia-Pacific, Stellantis dominates Europe and North America, Philips operates globally with healthcare focus, CNH serves agricultural markets worldwide. Currency exposure naturally hedges—euro weakness helps Ferrari's exports, dollar strength aids Stellantis' North American profits, emerging market growth drives CNH demand.
Recent portfolio activity shows strategic discipline. The Iveco sale to Tata Motors for €3.8 billion eliminated commercial vehicle exposure—a segment facing electrification challenges without Ferrari's pricing power or CNH's agricultural moat. The proceeds strengthen the balance sheet for opportunistic investments. Similarly, smaller stake adjustments—increasing Philips, trimming listed securities—reflect active management rather than passive holding.
The Luxury, Healthcare, and Technology Focus
Elkann's strategic vision crystallizes around three megatrends: luxury's resilience, healthcare's demographics, and technology's enablement. This isn't trendy sector rotation but structural positioning for decades-long shifts. Luxury goods have outperformed every other sector over 30 years, driven by wealth concentration and emerging market aspirations. Healthcare spending must increase as populations age and expectations rise. Technology underpins everything—from Ferrari's electric supercars to Philips' AI-powered diagnostics.
The luxury positioning extends beyond Ferrari. Through ventures and partnerships, EXOR has invested in Christian Louboutin (shoes), Shang Xia (Chinese luxury), and The Economist (intellectual luxury). The common thread isn't product category but pricing power—the ability to raise prices faster than costs, creating expanding margins. Ferrari exemplifies this: average selling prices exceed €350,000, yet demand requires multi-year waiting lists.
Healthcare represents EXOR's highest-conviction theme. Beyond Philips, investments include Institut MĂ©rieux (diagnostics), Lifenet Healthcare (hospital management), and multiple ventures in digital health. The thesis is simple: healthcare spending as percentage of GDP must rise globally, creating a multi-trillion-dollar opportunity. EXOR targets companies with technology differentiation, not commodity healthcare services.
Technology investing happens through multiple channels. Lingotto, established in 2023 with initial capital around €2 billion from EXOR and Covéa, has attracted investment talent like former Baillie Gifford partner James Anderson. Exor Ventures has deployed €600+ million into startups. The approach differs from Silicon Valley venture capital—EXOR provides patient capital and strategic support rather than quick flips.
Lingotto Investment Management Launch
Lingotto represents EXOR's evolution from holding company to investment platform. Established in 2023, Lingotto has multiple investment strategies, each led by a Managing Partner and Chief Investment Officer, unified by a commitment to being curious, courageous, humble and patient. The structure allows EXOR to leverage its capital alongside external investors while building institutional investment capabilities.
The talent assembled is world-class. James Anderson, who backed Tesla and Amazon at Baillie Gifford, leads Innovation strategy. Matteo Scolari, formerly of Eton Park, runs Equity Long/Short. Nikhil Srinivasan manages Event-Driven and Fund investments. CEO Enrico Vellano, EXOR's former CFO, understands both public markets and family office dynamics. This isn't a captive fund managing only EXOR money but an independent manager attracting external capital.
Lingotto's investment philosophy aligns with EXOR's patient capital approach. They are comfortable with concentration, illiquidity and volatility, which they view as opportunities rather than risks. This contrasts with typical asset managers obsessed with volatility reduction and benchmark hugging. Early investments span public and private markets, developed and emerging economies, technology and traditional industries.
The strategic value exceeds financial returns. Lingotto provides EXOR access to deals beyond its traditional networks, intelligence on emerging trends, and co-investment opportunities that multiply firepower. It also offers talent development—the next generation of EXOR leaders might emerge from Lingotto's ranks. Most importantly, it transforms EXOR from passive owner to active ecosystem participant.
Recent Iveco Sale to Tata Motors
The July 30, 2025 announcement of Iveco's sale to Tata Motors for approximately €3.8 billion marks EXOR's exit from commercial vehicles. The transaction structure—voluntary tender offer at €14.1 per share—provided immediate liquidity. EXOR, holding approximately 27.06% of Iveco's shares and 43.11% of voting rights, irrevocably committed to tender its entire stake.
The strategic logic was compelling. Iveco faced electric transition challenges without Ferrari's pricing power or Stellantis's scale. Chinese competition intensified in European markets. Capital requirements for electrification and autonomy stretched balance sheets. Tata offered industrial synergies—combining Iveco's European presence with Tata's Asian dominance—that EXOR couldn't provide.
The timing proved optimal. Commercial vehicle valuations recovered post-COVID as supply chains normalized. The separation of Iveco's defense business (sold separately to Leonardo for €1.7 billion) removed complexity. The structure—cash payment without regulatory conditions—ensured swift execution. EXOR captured value created through the 2022 spin-off from CNH Industrial while avoiding future transition risks.
The proceeds deployment reflects strategic discipline. Rather than rushing into new investments, EXOR is strengthening its balance sheet, funding share buybacks, and maintaining dry powder for opportunities. The €1 billion share buyback program announced in March 2025, structured as a tender offer with up to 10% premium, demonstrates confidence in existing portfolio value.
What John Elkann Might Do Next
Reading Elkann's next moves requires understanding his pattern recognition. Every major decision—from the EXOR formation to Ferrari spin-off to PartnerRe sale—followed similar logic: simplify structure, crystallize value, redeploy capital, repeat. The current portfolio positioning suggests several potential moves.
A Stellantis restructuring seems increasingly likely. The automotive giant's complexity—14 brands across multiple continents—mirrors pre-breakup FIAT. Separating luxury brands (Maserati, Alfa Romeo) from mass market, or splitting geographic regions, could unlock value. EXOR's experience executing spin-offs positions it to lead such restructuring. The family's emotional attachment to Italian brands won't prevent rational capital allocation.
Healthcare consolidation offers opportunities. With Philips as an anchor position and multiple smaller investments, EXOR could orchestrate roll-ups in medical technology, diagnostics, or digital health. The PartnerRe proceeds provide acquisition currency. The aging demographic theme supports long-term growth. European healthcare assets remain cheaper than American equivalents.
A major luxury acquisition would fit the strategic framework. Brands with heritage, pricing power, and global appeal align with EXOR's competencies. Italian fashion houses facing succession issues might welcome EXOR's patient capital and governance expertise. The Ferrari halo effect—proof EXOR can steward luxury brands—attracts sellers.
Technology platform investments through Lingotto could accelerate. The partnership with world-class investors provides deal flow and expertise. The venture portfolio seeds future giants. The patient capital approach suits technology's long development cycles. Unlike typical venture capital, EXOR can hold winners for decades.
Geographic expansion into Asia seems inevitable. China represents Ferrari's fastest-growing market, agricultural mechanization's biggest opportunity, and healthcare's largest incremental demand. Direct investments in Asian companies, joint ventures with local partners, or regional holding structures could provide exposure. The Shang Xia luxury investment demonstrates willingness to engage China despite geopolitical risks.
The meta-theme across potential moves is transformation—from European to global, from industrial to post-industrial, from family office to investment platform. Elkann has proven ability to execute such transformation while maintaining family control and cultural continuity. The next decade likely sees EXOR become less Italian, less automotive, more global, more diversified, yet somehow still distinctly Agnelli. The empire that began with Giovanni Agnelli's automobile factory in 1899 continues evolving, now guided by algorithms and ambition rather than just ancestry.
XII. Conclusion: The Agnelli Empire's Next Century
Standing in the Lingotto building in Turin—FIAT's legendary former factory with a rooftop test track, now a shopping and cultural center—you can literally feel the weight of industrial history. This is where Giovanni Agnelli built automobiles that mobilized Italy, where Gianni Agnelli entertained heads of state, where Sergio Marchionne plotted the Chrysler acquisition. Today, it's mostly tourists and shoppers, but the name lives on in EXOR's new investment management arm. The symbolism is perfect: a manufacturing cathedral transformed into a services hub, industrial heritage repurposed for post-industrial reality.
The EXOR story we've traced—from 1899 to 2025—isn't just corporate history but a masterclass in evolutionary adaptation. Four generations of Agnellis have navigated two world wars, multiple economic crises, industry disruptions, and family tragedies while not just preserving but multiplying wealth. The €38.2 billion NAV represents more than financial success; it's proof that family enterprises can professionalize without losing identity, that European companies can globalize without abandoning roots, that industrial conglomerates can transform into sophisticated investment vehicles.
John Elkann's achievement deserves particular recognition. Thrust into leadership at 28 amid existential crisis, he's orchestrated one of business history's great transformations. The simplification from IFI/IFIL to EXOR, the navigation of FIAT's near-bankruptcy, the value-creating spin-offs of Ferrari and CNH Industrial, the successful exits from PartnerRe and Iveco—each decision required courage to break from tradition while honoring legacy. That EXOR's NAV per share has grown twelve-fold during his tenure while maintaining family control and cultural continuity borders on miraculous.
Yet the challenges ahead match any previously faced. Stellantis must navigate the electric vehicle transition without the subsidies Chinese competitors enjoy or Tesla's software advantages. Ferrari must maintain exclusivity while meeting environmental regulations and changing consumer preferences. Philips must execute its healthcare technology strategy amid cost pressures and competition. CNH Industrial must adapt to precision agriculture without losing traditional farmers. Each investment faces disruption that no amount of patient capital can prevent, only navigate.
The portfolio evolution toward luxury, healthcare, and technology acknowledges these realities. These sectors offer what automotive manufacturing increasingly doesn't: pricing power, demographic tailwinds, and network effects. The Lingotto launch adds institutional capabilities beyond family office investing. The simplified structure enables rapid response to opportunities. The war chest from recent sales provides ammunition for transformation. EXOR is positioned for its next century better than most companies are positioned for their next quarter.
The persistent NAV discount remains both frustration and opportunity. Markets value EXOR like a dying industrial conglomerate rather than a sophisticated investment vehicle. The family control that ensures stability also caps valuations. The European domicile carries sovereign risk despite global operations. Yet this discount creates opportunity for patient investors who see through narrative to reality. If EXOR traded at peer multiples, the upside would exceed 50%. If it achieved Berkshire-like premiums, the stock would double. Neither seems imminent, but neither seems impossible.
The broader lessons transcend EXOR's specific situation. First, family control can enhance rather than destroy value if exercised with discipline and professionalism. Second, industrial heritage provides foundation not prison—the capabilities developed manufacturing cars can be redeployed managing portfolios. Third, complexity can be systematically reduced through patient restructuring rather than dramatic breakups. Fourth, value creation comes from active ownership not passive holding—knowing when to separate, when to sell, when to double down.
Perhaps most importantly, EXOR demonstrates that European business can compete globally without abandoning its character. In an era of algorithmic trading and quarterly capitalism, EXOR operates with century-long perspective. While Silicon Valley celebrates disruption, EXOR practices evolution. As American capitalism increasingly concentrates wealth, EXOR maintains stakeholder balance. The model isn't perfect—the governance concerns are real, the automotive exposure is risky, the NAV discount persists—but it offers an alternative to both state capitalism and unfettered markets.
Looking forward, EXOR's next chapter will likely see continued portfolio evolution. Stellantis might be restructured or partially sold. New healthcare and luxury investments will probably emerge. Asian expansion seems inevitable. The family structure will eventually transition to the fifth generation. Through it all, the core philosophy—building great companies with great people—will likely endure. The specific assets matter less than the approach: patient capital, active ownership, strategic flexibility, operational excellence.
The investment implications depend on time horizon and risk tolerance. For traders, EXOR offers little—low liquidity, no momentum, unclear catalysts. For value investors, the NAV discount provides margin of safety, though patience is required. For quality investors, the asset collection—Ferrari, Philips, CNH—offers exposure to excellent businesses. For dynasty builders, EXOR provides a template for multi-generational wealth preservation and growth.
The story that began with Giovanni Agnelli's automobile factory in 1899 continues evolving, now encompassing supercars and medical devices, venture capital and agricultural equipment, Dutch holding companies and Chinese luxury brands. It's a testament to capitalism's creative destruction and family enterprise's surprising resilience. Whether EXOR thrives for another century depends on variables nobody can predict—technological disruption, geopolitical shifts, family dynamics, market cycles.
Yet betting against the Agnellis has historically been unprofitable. They've survived Mussolini and market crashes, world wars and oil crises, German competition and Chinese disruption. Each challenge forced adaptation that ultimately strengthened the enterprise. The current transformation—from automotive conglomerate to diversified investment vehicle—might be the most dramatic yet, but it follows a familiar pattern: recognize reality, restructure accordingly, redeploy capital, repeat.
In the end, EXOR represents something increasingly rare: patient capital with permanent perspective, family ownership with professional management, European heritage with global ambition, industrial history with post-industrial future. The empire that Giovanni Agnelli founded hasn't just survived—it's evolved into something he couldn't have imagined but would likely admire. The next century promises equal transformation. Whether public market investors will finally recognize the value being created remains the billion-euro question. For those willing to wait, the answer might prove profitable.
StockTwits
Spotify
Apple Podcasts
Amazon Music
Audible
YouTube
Castbox
Pocket Casts